Measuring the Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry-Based Modules for Training Analytical Thinking Skills in Teaching Materials on the Structure and Function of Plant Tissues for Class VIII SMP Negeri 22 Surakarta
), Itok Dwi Kurniawan(2),
(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Research and development objectives: measure the effectiveness of analytical thinking skills through guided inquiry-based modules. Data analysis used during research and development is descriptive analysis, percentage techniques and anacova tests. Research and development of teaching modules uses the Borg & Gall procedural model which has been modified into nine stages: 1) research and information gathering stage, 2) planning stage, 3) initial product design development stage, 4) initial field trial stage, 5) initial first stage product revision, 6) limited field test stage, 7) second stage product revision stage, 8) operational field test stage, 9) final product revision stage. The results of research and development show: the guided inquiry-based module is effective in training analytical thinking skills, because based on the results of the Anakova test, it shows that there are differences in post-test results between the experimental, control and model classes. teaching material on the structure and function of plant tissues with F Table (0.05) = 2.37 < F Calculate (0.05: 2) = 6.35.
Keywords
References
Amer, A. 2005. Analytical Thinking. Cairo: Cairo University.
Baron, L. 2010. Using Scaffolding and Guided-Inquiry to Improve Learning in a Post-Graduate Forensic Science Laboratory Class. London: King's College London.
Borg, W. R, & Gall, M. D. 1983. Educational Research an Introduction (Revision Edition). USA: Von Hoffman Press.
Carmesi, S, & Digiorgio, K. 2009. Teaching the Inquiry to 21st Century Learners. Library Media Conection. Virginia.
Demirci, C. 2009. Constructivist Learning Approach in Science Teaching. Journal of Education. 37: 24-35. Eskisehir Osmangazi University.
Dkeidek, et al, 2010. Effect of Culture on High-School Students’ Question-Asking Ability Resulting from an Inquiry-Oriented Chemistry Laboratory. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 9: 1305-1331. Taiwan: National Science Council.
Elder, L, & Paul, R. 2007. The Thinker’s Guide to Analytic Thinking. Dillon Beach: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Fascione, P. A. 2013. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consencus for Purposes of Educational Assesment and Instruction. California: California Academic Press.
Joyce, B, & Weil, M. 2011. Model of Teaching (edisi kedelapan).Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Gazi, Z. A. 2009. Implementing Constructivist Approach Into Online Course Designs in Distance Education Institute at Eastern Mediterranean University. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology: Eastern Mediterranean University.
Gengarelly, L. M, & Abrams, E. D. 2008. Closing the Gap: Inquiry in Research and the Secondary Science Classroom. Journal of Sci Educ Technol. 18:74-84. USA: University of New Hampshire.
Hall, L. M. 2013. An Inquiry-Based Biochemistry Laboratory Structure Emphasizing Competency in the Scientific Process: A Guided Approach with an Electronic Notebook Format. The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Abstr. Massachusetts: EBSCO.
Hanson, D. M. 2006. Instructor’s Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning. Stony Brook University: Pacific Crest.
Kai-Wu, H, & Chou-En, H. 2008. Developing Sixth Graders’ Inquiry Skills to Construct Explanations in Inquiry-based Learning Environments. Developing Inquiry Skills to Construct Explanations. Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.
Kay, K. 2010. Enriching Minds for the 21st Century. USA: Solution Tree Press.
Kim, J. S. 2005. The Effect of a Constructivist Teaching Approach on Student Academic Achievement, Self Concept and Learning Strategies. Asian Pasific Education Review. 6 (12). Korea: Chungnam National University.
Khan, M, & Iqbal, M. Z. 2011. Effect of Inquiry Lab Teaching Method on the Development of Scientific Skills Through the Teaching of Biology in Pakistan. 11 (1): Pakistan.
Martin, R., et al. 2005. Teaching Science for All Children:an Inquiry Approach (with “Video Explorations” Video Workshop CD-ROM). USA: Alyyn and Bacon 75 Arlington St.,Sulte 300 Boston.
Mulyasa, E. 2006. Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Noiwong, W, & Phinyocheep, P. 2012. Promoting Secondary Students’ Understanding of Scientific Concepts through a Guided-Inquiry Laboratory: Polymers and their Properties. The International Journal of Learning. 18 (10): 1447-9494. Thailand: Mahidol University.
Oyola, J. E. 2013. Instructional Materials: A Platform to Enhance Cognitive Skills and Writing Development. Colomb Appl Linguistik Journal. 12: 0123-4641. Bogota: Universidad EAN.
Prastowo, A. 2012. Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
Robbins, J. K. 2011. Problem Solving, Reasoning, and Analytical Thinking in a Classroom Environment. Morningside Academy and Partnerships for Educational Excellence and Research International. 12 (1): 1555-7855. Dakota: The Behavior Analyst Today.
Rooney, C. 2009. How Am I Using Inquiry-Based Learning to Improve My Practice and to Encourage Higher Order Thinking Among My Students of Mathematics?. Educational Journal of Living Theories. 5 (2): 99-127. Ireland: Dublin City University.
Rusche, S. N, & Jason, K. 2011. “You Have to Absorb Yourself in It”: Using Inquiry and Reflection to Promote Student Learning and Self-knowledge. American Sociological Association. 39 (4). DOI: 10.1177/0092055X11418685: SAGE.
Sadeh, I, & Zion, M. 2011. Which Type of Inquiry Project Do High School iology Students Prefer: Open or Guided?. Res Sci Educ. 42: 831-848. Israel. Bar-llan University: Springer.
Schlueter, M. A, & D'costa, A. L. 2013. Guided-Inquiry Labs Using Bean Beetles for Teaching the Scientific Method & Experimental Design. American Biology Teacher. Abstr. 75 (3): 214-218: EBSCO.
Sexton, T. 2013. Develop Analytical & Critical Thinking. E-book of a Guide to Developing Analytical & Critical Thinking While You Work: Wise Leader Group Ltd.
Suk-cho, C, et al. 2012. Developing and Implementing Guided Inquiry Modules in a Construction Materials Course. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 139 (1): 27–32. USA: American Society for Engineering Education.
Trevathan, J, & Myers, T. 2013. Towards Online Delivery of Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Techniques in In Information Technology Courses. Journal of Learning Design. 6 (12). Griffith University & James Cook University.
Trianto. 2007. Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Widhiarso, W. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Kovarian dalam Penelitian Eksperimen. Yogyakarta: UGM.
Zion, et al. 2007. The Spectrum of Dynamic Inquiry Teaching Practices. Res Sci Educ. 37: 423-447. (Online), (http://www.springer.com) diakses tanggal 11 Oktober 2013
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 106 times
Download : 67 times
DOI: 10.57235/ijedr.v2i1.1261
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Sulis Indrianto, Itok Dwi Kurniawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.png)
.png)
