Judicial Analysis of Violent Crimes (Barelang Police Case Study)

Fajrul Rasul(1), Soerya Respationo(2), Erniyanti Erniyanti(3), Ramlan Ramlan(4),


(1) Universitas Batam
(2) Universitas Batam
(3) Universitas Batam
(4) Universitas Batam
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Article 28D paragraph (1) of the Third Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia affirms that every individual has the right to be recognized, assured protection, and obtain fair legal certainty, as well as equal treatment before the law. The normative juridical research method is descriptive-analytical, conducted by examining literature, legislation, and utilizing legal enforcement theory, Criminal Theory, and Islamic Justice Theory as the issues examined. The research aims to analyze the legal aspects of the implementation of the crime of Robbery with Violence in the verdict number: 344/Pid.B/2019/PN Btm. With the formulation of the problems: How is the legal analysis of the application of the crime of robbery with violence in the criminal case verdict Number: 344/Pid.B/2019/PN Btm, What are the judge's considerations in delivering a verdict on the Crime of Robbery with Violence in the Criminal Case Number: 344/Pid.B/2019/PN Btm. The research findings and discussion indicate that The legal analysis of the application of the crime of Robbery with Violence in the criminal case verdict Number: 344/Pid.B/2019/PN Btm under Article 365 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code (KUHP) on robbery with violence resulted in a sentence of one year and two months imprisonment with a fine of five thousand rupiahs, which the imposed penalty by the panel of judges was considered too lenient. The maximum criminal penalty under Article 365 of the Criminal Code is nine years. The judge's considerations in delivering a verdict on the Crime of Robbery with Violence involve juridical considerations, where the defendant's actions are proven convincingly and meet all elements in Article 365 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. Non-juridical considerations include the absence of factors that could eliminate criminal liability, either as justifying or mitigating factors, thereby holding the defendant accountable for their actions.


Keywords


Legal Analysis, Application, Crime of Robbery with Violence

References


Abuddin Nata. 2000. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Adami Chazawi. 2002. Percobaan & Penyertaan, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Adami Chazawi. 2004. Kejahatan Terhadap Harta Benda. Malang: Bayumedia.

Adami Chazawi. 2007. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Grafindo.

Amirudin dan Zainal Asikin. 2004. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada..

Amran Suadi dan Mardi Chandra. 2016. Politik Hukum Perspektif Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Islam dan Ekonomi Syariah. Jakarta: PrenadaMediaGroup.

Undang-undang Dasar Negara Rebublik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 103 times
PDF Download : 102 times

DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v3i1.1465

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Fajrul Rasul, Soerya Respationo, Erniyanti Erniyanti, Ramlan Ramlan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.