Differences between STAD and TSTS Cooperative Learning Models on Mathematics Learning Outcomes for Class X Students at Sultan Iskandar Muda Private High School
), W L Sihombing(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Medan
(2) Universitas Negeri Medan
Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students taught using two different cooperative learning models: Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS). This research employs a quasi-experimental method with a quantitative approach. Conducted at SMA Swasta Sultan Iskandar Muda Medan, the study involved two sample classes selected using purposive sampling technique. Class X IPA 7 was designated as Experiment I with the implementation of the TSTS model, while class X IPA 5 served as Experiment II with the STAD model. Data were collected through observation sheets and learning outcome tests consisting of 5 essay questions. Data analysis was performed using t-test with the Independent Sample T-Test technique via IBM SPSS 27 software. The results indicated that the average score of the class taught using the TSTS model was 81.00, while the class taught using the STAD model scored 74.27. Hypothesis testing showed a of 3.128 and a value of 1.672 with a significance level of 0.003 < 0.05, leading to the rejection of H0 and the acceptance of Ha. In conclusion, the mathematics learning outcomes of students taught with the TSTS cooperative learning model are higher compared to those taught with the STAD cooperative learning model.
Keywords
References
Arifin, Z. 2015. Cooperative Learning: Model STAD (Student Teams Achievement Divisions). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Arifin, Zainal. 2011. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya
Arikunto, S. 2014. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Aris, Shoimin. 2014. 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta : AR-RUZ Media.
Ashari, H., & Vitalocca, D. 2023. Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) dalam Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Profesi Keguruan, 3(1), 75–81
Dimyati, & Mudjiono. 2015. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Djamaluddin, A., & Wardana, W. 2019. Belajar dan Pembelajaran: 4 Pilar Peningkatan Kompetensi Pedagogis. Sulawesi Selatan : CV. Kaaffah Learning Center
Hamalik, Oemar. 2011. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Huda, N. 2017. Cooperative Learning: Metode, Teknik, Struktur, dan Model. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Huda, N., Rohaeti, E. E., & Utami, E. S. 2019. The Effect of the TSTS Cooperative Learning Model on Student Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Class X SMA Negeri 1 Gedeg. Journal of Mathematics Education Science and Technology, 2(2), 127–137.
Indrawati dan Wanwan setiawan. 2009. Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif dan Menyenangkan Untuk Guru SD. Bandung: PPPPTK IPA.
Isjoni. 2009. Cooperative Learning. Bandung : Alfabet
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. 2019. An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.
Lie, Anita. 2019. Cooperative Learning. Jakarta : Grasindo
Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi (Kemendikbudristek). (2023). Laporan Kinerja (LAKIN) 2022. Jakarta.
Muhibbin Syah. 2019. Psikologi Pendidikan Dengan Pendekatan Baru. Jakarta
Muslich, M. 2019. Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi dan Kontekstual. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Nana Sudjana dan Ibrahim. 2009. Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo
Purwanto. 2010. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Rahim, R., Syaifudin, & Nery, R. S. 2019. Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 39–54.
Ricardo., & Meilani, R. I. 2017. Impak Minat dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran. Vol.1, No.1, Hal 90. Bandung : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Sagala, Syaiful. 2018. Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung : Alfabeta
Siregar, E., & Nara, H. 2011. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia
Slavin, R. E. 2015. Cooperative Learning in Elementary Schools. Education 3-13, 43(1), 5–14.
Sri Wahyuni. 2019. Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Sudirman, I. 2019. Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran STAD (Student Teams Achievement Division) dengan Model Konvensional pada Mata Diklat Melakukan Pekerjaan Dasar Perbaikan Motor Listrik (Studi Kasus pada Siswa Kelas 2 di Balai Pengembangan Teknologi Pendidikan Bandung). S1 Thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Sudjana, Nana. 2007. Definisi hasil belajar. Bandung: Rosada.
Sudjana, Nana. 2014. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sudjana. 2022. Metoda Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito
Sugiyono, 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Sulistio, A., & Haryanti, N. 2022. Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif (Cooperative Learning Model). Purbalingga : Eurekamedia Aksara
Suprijono, Agus. 2011. Model-Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Jaya
Sutopo, M.T. 2022. Pendidikan Matematika Berbasis Karakter. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Sutrisno, dkk. (2017). Matematika untuk Semua. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Suwarsono, M.Pd. 2020. Pentingnya Pendidikan Matematika di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Tan, O. S. 2014. Cooperative Learning in the Classroom: Putting It Into Practice. Springer.
Warsono dan Hariyanto. 2012. Pembelajaran Aktif: Teori dan Asesmen. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Widdiharto, Rachmadi. 2004. Model-model Pembelajaran Matematika SMP. Yogyakarta: PPPG.
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 40 times
Download : 36 times
DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v4i1.3383
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Novy Any Waruwu, W L Sihombing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
