Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard as an Obstacle in an Execution Lawsuit: Indonesian Bankruptcy Law Perspective

(1) Universitas Tarumanagara
(2) Universitas Tarumanagara

Abstract
Bankruptcy is a legal solution that aims to resolve the debtor's inability to fulfill his obligations to creditors, as well as creating fairness in the distribution of assets. However, in practice, the implementation of guarantee execution often faces obstacles in the form of a Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard (Formal Defect) decision, namely a lawsuit that is declared inadmissible due to non-fulfillment of formal requirements such as a lack of relevant parties (Plurium Litis Consortium), unclear object of the lawsuit (obscuur libel). ), or other administrative errors. This obstacle not only slows down the dispute resolution process, but also disrupts legal certainty, especially for separatist creditors who have special rights over the debtor's collateral. This research aims to analyze the causes of claims being declared Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard (Formally Disabled) in the bankruptcy process, their impact on the effectiveness of collateral execution, and offer recommendations to improve the efficiency of the legal system. Using normative juridical research methods, this article examines relevant legislation, legal documents and jurisprudence. This analysis shows that these legal obstacles are often caused by a lack of understanding of civil procedural legal procedures, completeness of documents, and inaccuracies in preparing lawsuits. This article recommends improving regulations to clarify formal lawsuit requirements, education and training for legal practitioners, as well as digitizing court administration processes to minimize procedural errors. The implementation of these steps is expected to reduce legal obstacles resulting from Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard (Formal Defects) and ensure legal certainty in the execution of guarantees in bankruptcy, so that the dispute resolution process can run more fairly and efficiently.
Keywords
References
Andi Hamzah, Kamus Hukum, (Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta : 2005)
Bachtiar, B., & Sumarna, T. (2018). Pembebanan Tanggung Jawab Perdata Kepada Kepala Daerah Akibat Wanprestasi Oleh Kepala Dinas (Kajian Putusan Nomor 72/Pdt.G/2014/Pn.Tng). Jurnal Yudisial, 11(2).
Evie Christy, Wilsen, Dewi Rumaisa, Kepastian Hukum Hak Preferensi Pemegang Hak Tanggungan dalam Kasus Kepailitan, Kanun Jurnal Hukum Vol. 22, No. 2, (Agustus, 2020).
Hans Kelsen, Teori Umum Tentang Hukum dan Negara, (PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Bandung, 2006).
Harahap M. Yahya, Beberapa Permasalahan Hukum Acara Pada Peradilan Agama, (Yayasan Al-Hikmah, Jakarta, 1993).
Harahap, M. Yahya, Hukum Acara Perdata: Gugatan, Persidangan Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan (Edisi Kedua),( Sinar Grafika , Jakarta : 2017).
Harun Badriyah, Prosedur Gugatan Perdata, Pustaka Yustisia, Yogyakarta, 2010.
M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata, tentang, gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan, (Jakarta, Sinar Grafika : 2017).
Manan Abdul, Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata, Kencana, Jakarta, 2005.
Mertokusumo Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1988.
Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, ( Liberty, Yogyakarta : 1999).
Mertokusumo, Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2001).
Mulyadi Lilik,Putusan hakim dalam hukum acara perdata Indonesia, (PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung :2009).
Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata
R. Subekti, Hukum Perjanjian, Jakarta, PT Intermasa, 1984.
Subekti, Aneka Perjanjian, (PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung : 1995).
Subhan, M. H., Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan, (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group : 2012).
Sutarno, Aspek - Aspek Hukum Perkreditan Pada Bank, (Alfabeta : 2003).
Article Metrics
Abstract View

DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v4i1.4834
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Zildjian Aditya Muda, Ariawan Gunardi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.