Peperangan Asimetris dan Globalisasi: Dampak Terhadap Paradigma Pertahanan Nasional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v4i1.5300Keywords:
Peperangan asimetris, globalisasi, pertahanan nasional, keamanan non-tradisional, paradigma keamananAbstract
Artikel ini mengkaji hubungan antara peperangan asimetris, globalisasi, dan perubahan paradigma pertahanan nasional dalam konteks keamanan global kontemporer. Dengan meningkatnya ancaman non-tradisional dan aktor non-negara, negara-negara menghadapi tantangan baru dalam mempertahankan keamanan nasional mereka. Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana globalisasi telah memfasilitasi munculnya peperangan asimetris dan dampaknya terhadap strategi pertahanan konvensional. Melalui analisis literatur komprehensif dan studi kasus, artikel ini mengidentifikasi pergeseran paradigma dalam pertahanan nasional, menekankan pentingnya pendekatan holistik yang menggabungkan elemen-elemen keamanan tradisional dan non-tradisional. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa adaptasi terhadap lingkungan keamanan yang berubah memerlukan reformulasi doktrin militer, peningkatan kerjasama ke internasional, dan pengembangan kapabilitas yang lebih fleksibel dan responsif. Implikasi dari penelitian ini memberikan wawasan berharga bagi pembuat kebijakan dan profesional keamanan dalam menghadapi tantangan keamanan abad -21.
Downloads
References
Abuza, Z. (2003). Militant Islam in Southeast Asia: Crucible of Terror. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Akhgar, B., Bayerl, P. S., & Sampson, F. (Eds.). (2015). Open Source Intelligence Investigation: From Strategy to Implementation. Springer.
Alberts, D. S., & Hayes, R. E. (2003). Power to the Edge: Command... Control... in the Information Age. CCRP Publication Series.
Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (2001). Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy. RAND Corporation.
Boot, M. (2006). War Made New: Technology, Warfare, and the Course of History, 1500 to Today. Gotham Books.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Chalk, P., Rabasa, A., Rosenau, W., & Piggott, L. (2009). The Evolving Terrorist Threat to Southeast Asia: A Net Assessment. RAND Corporation.
, S. A. (2010). Israel's Asymmetric Wars. Palgrave Macmillan.
Farrell, T., Osinga, F., & Russell, J. A. (Eds.). (2013). Military Adaptation in Afghanistan. Stanford University Press.
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Giustozzi, A. (2009). Empires of Mud: The Neo-Taliban Insurgency in Afghanistan 2002-2007. Columbia University Press.
Hammes, T. X. (2004). The Sling and the Stone: On War in the 21st Century. Zenith Press.
Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside Terrorism (Revised and Expanded Edition). Columbia University Press.
Horowitz, M. C. (2010). The Diffusion of Military Power: Causes and Consequences for International Politics. Princeton University Press.
Jones, S. G. (2010). In the Graveyard of Empires: America's War in Afghanistan. W. W. Norton & Company.
Kaldor, M. (2013). New and Old Wars: Organised Violence in a Global Era (3rd ed.). Polity Press.
Kilcullen, D. (2009). The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One. Oxford University Press.
Napoleoni, L. (2004). Terror Incorporated: Tracing the Dollars Behind the Terror Networks. Seven Stories Press.
Nye, J. S. (2011). The Future of Power. PublicAffairs.
Slaughter, A. M. (2004). A New World Order. Princeton University Press.
Smith, R. (2005). The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World. Allen Lane.
Stern, J., & Berger, J. M. (2015). ISIS: The State of Terror. Ecco.
Strawser, B. J. (Ed.). (2013). Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of an Unmanned Military. Oxford University Press.
Canetti, D., Waismel-Manor, I., Cohen, N., & Rapaport, C. (2014). What Does National Resilience Mean in a Democracy? Evidence from the United States and Israel. Armed Forces & Society, 40(3), 504-520.
Coaffee, J., & Wood, D. M. (2006). Security is Coming Home: Rethinking Scale and Constructing Resilience in the Global Urban Response to Terrorist Risk. International Relations, 20(4), 503-517.
Hegghammer, T. (2016). The Future of Jihadism in Europe: A Pessimistic View. Perspectives on Terrorism, 10(6), 156-170.
Krepinevich, A. F. (1994). Cavalry to Computer: The Pattern of Military Revolutions. The National Interest, (37), 30-42.
Krulak, C. C. (1999). The Strategic Corporal: Leadership in the Three Block War. Marines Magazine, 28(1), 28-34.
Lambakis, S. J. (2005). Reconsidering Asymmetric Warfare. Joint Force Quarterly, 36, 102-108.
Lindsay, J. R. (2013). Stuxnet and the Limits of Cyber Warfare. Security Studies, 22(3), 365-404.
Lind, W. S., Nightengale, K., Schmitt, J. F., Sutton, J. W., & Wilson, G. I. (1989). The Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation. Marine Corps Gazette, 73(10), 22-26.
Mack, A. (1975). Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict. World Politics, 27(2), 175-200.
Biddle, S., & Friedman, J. A. (2008). The 2006 Lebanon Campaign and the Future of Warfare: Implications for Army and Defense Policy. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
US Army Training and Doctrine Command. (2018). The U.S. Army in Multi-Domain Operations 2028. TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-1.
Chew, E. (2015). Globalisation, Citizen-Warriors and the Transformation of the National Security State: Singapore's Total Defence. In A. Kaminska (Ed.), The Modern Defence Industry: Political, Economic, and Technological Issues (pp. 137-156). Praeger. (This appears to be a book chapter)
Vittori, J. (2011). Terrorist Financing and Resourcing. P (This entry is incomplete, but appears to be a book)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
- Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
- Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
- Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia a Publisher of the manuscript.
- Authors reserve the following:
- all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights;
- the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
- use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
- voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.
