Filsafat Kekuasaan dalam Peperangan Asimetris: Kajian tentang Legitimasi dan Otoritas

Authors

  • Pasha Atta Usman Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Oktaheroe Ramsi Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Suhirwan Suhirwan Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v4i1.5413

Keywords:

Peperangan Asimetris, Filsafat Kekuasaan, Legitimasi, Otoritas, Just War Theor, Etika Militer

Abstract

Kajian tentang filsafat kekuasaan dalam konteks perang asimetris adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana dinamika legitimasi dan otoritas menjadi dasar tindakan serta strategi yang dilakukan oleh aktor-aktor yang tidak seimbang secara militer atau ekonomi. Terutama dalam perang asimetris, di mana pihak yang lebih lemah secara konvensional berhadapan dengan kekuatan yang lebih besar, isu legitimasi memainkan peran penting di semua hal saat berusaha untuk mendapat dukungan dan moralitas dalam pandangan umum publik serta masyarakat internasional. Dalam penelitian ini, kami menganalisis bagaimana aktor-aktor yang terlibat mengembangkan otoritas moral, politik dan sosial guna mengimbangi ketimpangan kekuatan dengan cara-cara non-konvensional seperti melalui narasi ideologis kampanye informasi bentuk lain dari perang hibrida. Dengan pendekatan filsafat politik dan etika, kajian ini mempertimbangkan konsep-konsep seperti ”just war theory”, legitimasi aksi kekerasan, serta batasan moral dalam operasi yang berpotensi mengorbankan hak-hak sipil dan lembaga internasional hukum. Studi ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman yang lebih jelas bagaimana kekuasaan dan otoritas dikonseptualisasikan serta dipertahankan dalam perang asimetris, dan apa dampaknya terhadap stabilitas global keamanan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Davis, K., & Nguyen, P. T. (2022). Hybrid Warfare: A Strategy for Weak Actors to Leverage Asymmetric Power. Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 27(4), 312-338.

González, M. E., & Kim, Y. (2019). "Ethics of Asymmetric Warfare: Moral Justifications and the Impact on Civilian Populations." Ethics and International Affairs, 33(2), 175-196.

Harris, R., & Patel, N. (2023). Global Security Implications of Asymmetric Conflicts: Challenging International Stability and Law. International Security Journal, 48(1), 45-67.

Hoffman, B. (2022). Hybrid Warfare and Its Implications for International Security. RAND Corporation.

Johnson, M. R., & Chen, H. Y. (2021). Ideological Narratives and Information Campaigns in Asymmetric Warfare. Global Media and Communication Journal, 17(3), 233-256.

Katz, M. (2023). "The Global Impact of Asymmetric Conflicts on International Law

Lynch, M. (2020). The New Arab Wars: Uprisings and Anarchy in the Middle East. PublicAffairs.

Martinez, A., & Lee, S. (2019). Ethics and Morality in Asymmetric Warfare: A Just War Theory Perspective. Ethics and International Affairs, 33(1), 89-107.

Smith, J., & Turner, L. (2020). Legitimacy as a Tool in Asymmetric Warfare: Shaping Public Perception and Gaining Support in Modern Conflicts. Journal of Strategic Studies, 43(2), 123-145.

Walsh, J. I. (2021). "Legitimacy and Resistance: The Role of Non-State Actors in Asymmetric Conflicts." Conflict, Security & Development, 21(5), 421-444.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January 2025

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.