Application of the Student Facilitator and Explaining Learning Model to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Basic Competencies Applying Concepts and Rules Types of Lines in Technical Drawings at SMK Negeri 1 Lotu for the 2022/2023 Academic Year

Carlos Yogi Moanoita Telaumbanua(1), Yelisman Zebua(2), Aprianus Telaumbanua(3),


(1) Universitas Nias
(2) Universitas Nias
(3) Universitas Nias
Corresponding Author

Abstract


The problem in this study is that the Student Facilitator and Explaining learning model has not been optimally applied to the Basic Competence of Applying Concepts and Rules of Types of Lines in Technical Drawings and student learning outcomes are only limited to achieving KKM, namely 70. Research objectives: (1) To describe the learning process by using apply the Student Facilitator and Explaining learning model to the Basic Competency of Applying Concepts and Rules of Types of Lines in Technical Drawings at SMK Negeri 1 Lotu for the 2022/2023 Academic Year, and (2) To find out student learning outcomes in the Basic Competency of Applying Type Concepts and Rules -Types of Lines in Technical Drawings at SMK Negeri 1 Lotu for the 2022/2023 Academic Year. This type of research is Classroom Action Research (CAR). This research was conducted at SMK Negeri 1 Lotu with research subjects of class X DPIB, totaling 22 people. The instruments in this study were observation sheets of the learning process (teacher respondents), student activity observation sheets, photo documentation, and student practical activity tests. Research results: (1) In cycle I (First) the average percentage of observations in the learning process (teacher respondents) is 62.50%, the average percentage of observations of student activity is 53.13%, the average learning outcomes is 65.07 with a percentage of student completeness of 45% and this result has not reached the target that has been set, namely 70. (2) While in cycle II (two) the average percentage of observations in the learning process (teacher respondents) is 85.71%, the average – the average percentage of observations of student activity is 82.10%, the average calculated student learning outcomes is 82.99 which is categorized as good with a complete percentage of student learning outcomes of 100% and has reached the set target of 70. From the research findings above it can be concluded that by applying the Student Facilitator and Explaining learning model to the subject of Technical Drawing Basic Competency Applying Concepts and Rules of Types of Lines in Technical Drawings and can improve student learning outcomes at SMK Negeri 1 Lotu.


Keywords


Student Facilitator and Explaining Learning, Learning Outcomes

References


Amri Sofan. 2013. Pengembangan & Model Pembelajaran Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta : PT. Prestasi Pustakaraya.

Arikunto Suharsimi. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta :Rineka Cipta

BSE Tim 2013. Gambar Teknik. Penerbit : Buku Sekolah Elektronik (BSE)

Dimyati, dkk. 2021. Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Djajadi Muhammad. 2019. Penelitian TIndakan Kelas. Yogyakarta. Penerbit: ARTI BUMI INTARAN (ANGGOTA IKAPI).

Dwi Aprilia. 2018. Gambar Teknik, Bidang Keahlian Teknologi dan Rekayasa C2 (Dasar Program Keahlian Teknik Konstruksi dan Properti SMK/MAK). Surakarta: CV. Mediatama.

Harefa Darmawan, 2021, Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika. p-ISSN: 1410-4695,Vol.14,

Hartoyo Sri.2018 Pedoman Perencanaan Teknik Terinci Sistem Pengolahan Air Limbah Domestik Terpusat (SPALD-T), BUKU F Panduan Penyusunan Gambar Teknik. Jakarta

Haryanto 2020.. Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Konsep dan manajemen). Yogyakarta. Penerbit. UNY Press

Heni Veroneka, 2017. Penerapan Metode Student Facilitator and Explaining Berbantuan Media Peta Timbul Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Sel. ISSN 2540-802X Vol. 2 No.2 Hal 20-26

Huda Miftahul 2015. Penelitian TIndakan Kelas : Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: PUSTAKA PELAJAR

Huda Miftahul. 2013. Model-Model Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran. Malang : Pustaka Pelajar

Istarani. 2011. 58 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Medan : Media Persada

Karwono,dkk. 2017. Belajar Dan Pembelajaran Serta Pemanfaatan Sumber Belajar. Depok : PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kunandar. 2013. Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta : PT. RajaGrafindo Persada

Kurniasih Imas, dkk. 2016. Ragam Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Untuk Peningkatan Profesionalitas Guru. Yogyakarta : Kata Pena

Mulyanto. 2013. Buku Teks Bahan Ajar Siswa. Gambar Teknik, Kelas X Semester I. Jakarta : Direktoret Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia

Shoimin Aris. 2014. 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovativ dalam kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Slameto. 2013. Belajar Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Subair Ahmad, dkk 2021, Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFAE) Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas V UPTD SDN 145 Barru. ISBN: 978-623-387-014-6

Sunarti, dkk. 2014. Penilaian Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta : C.V Andi Offset (Penerbit Andi)

Suyono, dkk. 2011. Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Universitas Nias. (2022). Pedoman Penulisan Karya Tulis Ilmiah. Gunungsitoli : Universitas Nias.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 137 times
PDF Download : 81 times

DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v2i2.751

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Carlos Yogi Moanoita Telaumbanua, Yelisman Zebua, Aprianus Telaumbanua

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.