Efforts to Improve Science Learning Achievement of Grade IX A Students of SMP Negeri 3 Sewon Using the Multy Representacy (DMR) Discourse Model for the 2021/2022 Academic Year

Sarjito Sarjito(1),


(1) Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 3 Sewon
Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to improve natural science (IPA) learning achievement using the Multy Reprecentacy (DMR) Discourse learning model.  This study is a class action research conducted with two (2) cycles. Each cycle consists of three (3) meetings, namely two (2) meetings for the learning process and one (1) meeting for achievement tests that are done independently. Each cycle follows the stages of the Kemmis and Taggart model which includes four components: planning, action, observation and reflection. The data collected in this study is the result of research related to the implementation of learning using the Multy Reprecentacy (DMR) Discourse model on natural science (IPA) material. Data collection techniques use test and non-test techniques with descriptive and qualitative approaches. The results showed that the use of the Multy Reprecentacy (DMR) Discourse model in natural science learning activities can improve student achievement. This increase in prestige is the effect of better and conductive teaching and learning activities of teachers and students. The success of this increase in learning achievement can be seen from the increase in learning achievement scores after conducting achievement tests with the "Multy Reprecentacy (DMR) Discourse" model, compared to learning using the lecture method. So learning using the "Multy Reprecentacy (DMR) Discourse" model, is proven to increase the achievement of science (science) for junior high school students.

Keywords


Multy Reprecentacy (DMR) Discourse, Improving Achievement, Junior High School Students.

References


Agus Suprijono. 2009. Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar

Andi Offset

Arends, Richald. 1997. Classroom Instructional Management. New York: The McGraw-Hill Company

Arief Sadiman. 1993. Media Pendidikan. Jakarta : Rajawali

Arikunto Suharsimi, 2007. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Aris Munandar, 2002. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Hand Out Diklat Guru SLTP.

E. Mulyasa, 2009. Praktek Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung : PT Rosdakarya

Hamalik, O., (2011), Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Poerwadarminta W.J.S. 1995. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : PKG Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Rusman, dkk (2011) Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi : Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta:Rajawali Pers. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Saefudin Azwar,1987. Tes Prestasi Belajar. Jakarta : Liberty

Sri Surini. dkk. 1995. Psikologi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Sudirman. (2011). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta : PT. Grafindo Indonesia

Supriyadi. 2007. Kurikulim Sains Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Sains. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Tempelsari

Suryabrata Sumadi, 2002. Proses Belajar Mengajar Di Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta :

Suyanto, (1996). Pedoman Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: Yogyakarta: UP35D IKIP Bandung: Angkasa

Trianto, 2010. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasinya dalam KTSP.. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Usman Samatowa. (2010). Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Yogyakarta : BPG


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 105 times
PDF Download : 105 times

DOI: 10.57235/jetish.v2i1.423

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Sarjito Sarjito

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.