Madiun City Central Corridor Walkability Assessment Seen from Urban Structure
), Rizon Pamardhi Utomo(2), Chrisna Trie Hadi Permana(3),
(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(3) Universitas Sebelas Maret
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Walkability is the condition and quality of the pedestrian environment that is assessed through measuring the friendliness of the built environment and meeting the needs of pedestrians. In supporting the walkability of the area, it is not only done by beautifying the pedestrian path through the addition of physical accessories, but must be able to fulfill the aspects of usability, safety, accessibility, comfort, and a good environment. In this case, urban structure shows an important and significant factor because it can affect the ease of a person in moving places in urban areas, especially on foot. Urban structure components that affect walkability include land use diversity and road network configuration, which consists of connectivity and integration of the road network. The assessment of land use diversity is done through a derivative of the entropy index, namely weighted land use mixed (WLUM), while the road network configuration is assessed through space syntax. As a result, the Madiun City center corridor has a walkability value in the medium category. This shows that the urban structure in the central corridor of Madiun City is still not able to support the walking activities of its residents well, but also does not make it difficult for residents to carry out mobility on foot.
Keywords
References
Barros, A. P., Martínez, L. M., & Viegas, J. M. (2017). How urban form promotes walkability? Transportation Research Procedia, 27, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.039
Chen, T., Hui, E. C. M., Wu, J., Lang, W., & Li, X. (2019). Identifying urban spatial structure and urban vibrancy in highly dense cities using georeferenced social media data. Habitat International, 89, 102005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102005
Demetriou, A., & Spanoudis, G. (2017). Mind and Intelligence: Integrating Developmental, Psychometric, and Cognitive Theories of Human Mind (pp. 39–60). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43473-5_3
du Toit, L., Cerin, E., Leslie, E., & Owen, N. (2007). Does walking in the neighbourhood enhance local sociability? Urban Studies, 44(9), 1677–1695. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701426665
Frank, L., Devlin, A., Johnstone, S., & Loon, J. Van. (2010). Neighbourhood design, travel, and health in Metro Vancouver: Using a walkability index. Health and Community Design Lab, …, October. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Neighbourhood+Design,+Travel,+and+Health+in+Metro+Vancouver+:+Using+a+Walkability+Index#0
Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural Movement: Or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement. Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design, 20, 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029
Koohsari, M. J., Nakaya, T., McCormack, G. R., Shibata, A., Ishii, K., Yasunaga, A., Hanibuchi, T., & Oka, K. (2021). Traditional and novel walkable built environment metrics and social capital. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214, 104184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104184
Litman, T. (2003). Economic Value of Walkability. Transportation Research Record 1828, 03, 3–11. http://trrjournalonline.trb.org/doi/pdf/10.3141/1828-01
Park, S., Deakin, E., & Lee, J. S. (2014). Perception-based walkability index to test impact of microlevel walkability on sustainable mode choice decisions. Transportation Research Record, 2464, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.3141/2464-16
Peiravian, F., Derrible, S., & Ijaz, F. (2014). Development and application of the Pedestrian Environment Index (PEI). Journal of Transport Geography, 39, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.020
Pemerintah Kota Madiun. (2019). Buku 3 Executive Summary Smart City Kota Madiun 2019-2024.
Permana, A. Y., & Wijaya, K. (2019). Analisis Konfigurasi Ruang Pondokan Mahasiswa di Kawasan Taman Hewan Balubur - Tamansari, Bandung. Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE, 3(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v3i1.209
Rafiemanzelat, R., Emadi, M. I., & Kamali, A. J. (2017). City sustainability: the influence of walkability on built environments. Transportation Research Procedia, 24, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.074
Shatu, F., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2018). Development and validity of a virtual street walkability audit tool for pedestrian route choice analysis—SWATCH. Journal of Transport Geography, 70(May), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.004
The Institution of Highways & Transportation. (2000). Guidelines For Providing For Journeys on Foot. The Institution of Highways & Transportation. http://tranterconsultores.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/PROVEYENDO-A-PEATONES.pdf
Tiarasari, R., & Kartidjo, W. (2021). Assesment of Pedestrian Walkability in the Urban Village with Urban Nework Analysis. The 20th Sustainable, Environment and Architecture, 738(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/738/1/012065
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 56 timesUntitled
Download : 30 times
DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2124
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Nuzula Firda Saadhati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
