Implementation of Pre-Trial Legal Efforts Taken by Suspects of Crimes of Sexual Abuse Against Minors
(1) Universitas Bandar Lampung
(2) Universitas Bandar Lampung
(3) Universitas Bandar Lampung
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Law is a means of punishment, where a criminal act is an act that is prohibited by a rule of law, where the prohibition is accompanied by a threat (sanction) in the form of a certain form of punishment. Problems in law enforcement that often occurred from the Dutch colonial era until after independence were related to coercive efforts carried out by law enforcement officials, especially investigators and public prosecutors. Pre-trial is an institution organized to examine coercive actions carried out by authorized officials as law enforcers. The idea of a Pre-Judicial institution was born from inspiration originating from the existence of the right of Habeas Corpus in the Anglo Saxon justice system, which provides fundamental guarantees for human rights, especially the right to liberty. The Habeas Corpus Act gives a person the right, through a court order, to sue (challenge) officials who implement formal criminal law (police or prosecutors) so that they do not violate the law (illegally) or, strictly speaking, are truly legal in accordance with applicable legal provisions. The issues that will be discussed in this writing are, the process of investigating alleged criminal acts of sexual abuse against minors at the Tulang Bawang Police Criminal Investigation Unit and the Judge's Considerations in deciding the Pre-Trial application from the applicant's application in Decision Number: 3/Pid.Pra/2022/PN. Mgl. The research method used is a normative juridical and empirical approach, using secondary and primary data, obtained from literature studies and field studies, and data analysis using normative juridical analysis. The results of research regarding the process of investigating alleged criminal acts of sexual abuse against minors are investigations that require a process such as making a report, carrying out an investigation, checking the post mortem, carrying out the case title, then sending a letter notifying the start of the investigation which aims to notify about the conduct of an investigation into a case, carry out investigations into statements from witnesses, determine suspects, conduct examinations of suspects, collect evidence, and carry out filings. The end of the investigation process which is the investigator's task is marked by a complete investigation report (P-21) or commonly called with Stage 1 and handing over evidence and also the suspect to the public prosecutor (P-22) or called Stage 2. Then the judge's consideration in giving a decision on a fraud case is the presence of evidence to prove which party is wrong and right, then the presence of witnesses who was presented at the trial to explain the chronology of the incident. Because of this, the judge decided to reject the Petitioner's pretrial application in its entirety, charging the Petitioner court costs of nil. The suggestion is that it is hoped that in the future the Tulang Bawang Police will play an active role in preventing or eradicating cases of sexual abuse against minors and other cases of sexual crimes in Tulang Bawang Regency. The public is also expected to immediately report any crime so that the investigation process can proceed well.
Keywords
References
Adami chazawi. 2005. Tindak Pidana Mengenai Kesopanan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
Ahmad Rifai. 2010. Penemuan Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Ahmad Rivai. 2016. Praktek Perkara Perdata Dalam Pengadilan Agama, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Amir Ilyas. 2012. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rangkang Education Yogyakarta & PuKAPIndonesia, Yogyakarta.
Andi Hamzah. 1996. KUHP dan KUHAP, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Andi Hamzah. 2005. Kamus Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia.
Andi Hamzah. 2012. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Edisi Kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Andi Hamzah. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Bambang Hartono. 2018. Kapita Selekta Tindak Pidana Ekonomi, Aura, Bandar Lampung.
Charlie Rudyat. 2013. Kamus Hukum, Pustaka Mahardika, Jakarta.
Danil, Elwi. 2011. Korupsi Tindak pidana, dan pemberantasannya. PT. Rajagrafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Departemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. 1994. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka. edisi ke 2, Jakarta, hlm: 893.
Djoko Prakoso. 1988. Alat Bukti dan Kekuatan Pembuktian di Dalam Proses Pidana, LIBERTY, Jakarta.
E.Y. Kanter. 1992. Azas-azas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Alumni AHMPTHM, Jakarta.
Eddy O.S. Hiarij. 2014. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta.
Erlina B dkk. 2021. Analisis Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Faktur Penjualan Atas Nama Perusahaan Distributor Lampu Bohlam Berbagai Merek. Widya Yuridika Jurnal Hukum. Volume 4, Nomor 1, Universitas Bandar Lampung.
Evi Hartanti. 2014. Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Hanafi Amrani dan Mahrus Ali. 2015. Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana perkembangan dan penerapan, Raja Grafindo Persada, depok.
http: //lp3madilindonesia. blogspot. com/2015/09/22 beban-pembuktian penuntut.html. Diakses Pada Tanggal 19 Januari 2023 pukul 14.01 WIB
I.P.M Ranuhandoko. 2003. Terminologi Hukum Inggris-Indonesia. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
I.S.Susanto, 2011, Kriminolog, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta
Lamintang, 1984. Dasar - dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Baru, Bandung.
M Jodi Santoso. 2008. Praperadilan Versus Hakim Komisaris. diakses di http://jodisantoso.blogspot.com/2008/02/praperadilan-versus-hakim-komisaris.html diakses pada tanggal 26 Agustus 2022
M. Yahya Harahap. 2000. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Moeljatno. 2003. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana KUHP, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Moeljatno. 2008. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Mukti Arto. 2004. Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, cet V, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Oemar Seno Adji. 1980. Hukum Hakim Pidana, Erlangga, Jakarta, hlm. 88.
P.A.F. Lamintang, 1997, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, PT. Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 1983 Jo. Peraturan pemerintah Nomor 58 Tahun 2010 Jo. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 92 Tahun 2015 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
R, Supomo. 2002 Kajian Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi, UII Press, Yogyakarta.
R. Soesilo. 1981. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Politea, Bogor.
R. Soesilo. 2013. Kitab Undang Hukum Pidana Serta Komentar- Komentar lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Politea, Bogor.
Ridwan A. Halim. 2002. Hukum Pidana dan Tanya Jawab. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta
Romli Atmasasmita. 2000. Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Rosalia Dika Agustanti. 2018. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perkosaan Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Moralitas, journal trunojoyo, volume 13 No. 1,.
Sampur Dongan Simamora & Mega Fitri Hertini. 2015. Hukum Pidana Dalam Bagan. FH Untan Press, Pontianak.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. 2002. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
Sudikno, Mertokusumo, Jenis Pembuktian Dalam Pengadilan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Team Izinesia. 2016. Pengertian teori dari pembuktian dalam hukum pidana. izinesia.id, Jakarta.
Teguh Prasetyo. 2010. Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo Persada. Depok.
Undang – Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 hasil Amandemen.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 Jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 73 Tahun 1958 tentang Pemberlakuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Republik Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro. 2003. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Refika Aditama. Bandung.
Zainab Ompu Jainah. 2010. Pertimbangan Hakim Untuk Dilakukan Rehabilitasi Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Golongan I (Studi Putusan No. 290/Pid.Sus/2016/Pn.Gns, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Universitas Bandar Lampung, Volume 8 No.1.
Zainab Ompu Jainah. 2018. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Tira Smart,Tangerang.
Zainudin Hasan. 2021. Analisis Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tersangka Dalam Status Daftar Pencarian Orang (Dpo) Pasca Melakukan Pra Peradilan. Keadilan Progresif, Bandar Lampung, Vol. 11, No. 2, hlm. 85
Article Metrics
Abstract View : 74 timesPDF Download : 60 times
DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v3i1.2408
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Fajar Nur Hafiz Jati, Bambang Hartono, Ansori Ansori
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.