Juridical Analysis of IPR Decision No. 438K/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2018 Concerning the "Lexus" Brand Dispute Between Marzuki Tan and Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki
),
(1) Universitas Tarumanagara
Corresponding Author
Abstract
The "LEXUS" brand dispute between Marzuki Tan and Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki is one of the important cases in intellectual property law in Indonesia. The Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court and the Supreme Court assessed that the registration of the trademark "LEXUS" by the Defendant was carried out in bad faith. In deciding this case, both courts considered various legal elements, including the substantial similarities between the mark registered by the Defendant and the well-known mark owned by the Plaintiff. This similarity, including visual, phonetic and conceptual aspects, is considered to have the potential to mislead consumers and harm legitimate brand owners. The plaintiff successfully demonstrated that its "LEXUS" mark is a well-known brand with a global reputation, which is widely promoted through various media. The Court concluded that the Defendant acted with the intention to take advantage of the Plaintiff's brand reputation, which constitutes a violation of the good faith principle in trademark registration. Supreme Court decision in cassation no. 438 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018 strengthens the Commercial Court's decision, emphasizing the protection of well-known marks from dishonest registration. This case not only provides legal protection for brand owners, but also establishes an important legal precedent regarding good faith in brand registration in Indonesia. Thus, this decision strengthens the well-known brand protection system, prevents attempts at imitation, and increases legal certainty in the protection of intellectual property in Indonesia.
Keywords
References
Adawiyah, R., & Rumawi, R. (2021). Pengaturan hak kekayaan intelektual dalam masyarakat komunal di indonesia. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 10(1), 1-16.
Asri, D. P. B. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Bagi Produk Kreatif Usaha Kecil Menengah Di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27(1), 130-150.
Clarisa, H. (2022). Fake Review and Liabilities Defect Goods in E-Commerce. The Lawpreneurship Journal, 2(1), 19-42.
Darwance, D., Yokotani, Y., & Anggita, W. (2020). Dasar-Dasar Pemikiran Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum, 14(2), 193-208.
Disemadi, H. S., & Kang, C. (2021). Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 7(1), 54-71.
Gunawan, Y. (2023). The Perspective of Indonesian State Law in Seeing the Superiority of Well-Known Brands at the International Level. Tec Empresarial, 18(1), 72-87.
Hidayah, Khoirul. "Hukum hak kekayaan intelektual." (2017).
Indriani, I. (2018). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Karya Musik. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(2), 246-263.
Irvan, N., Akyuwen, R. J., & Balik, A. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemilik Merek Tidak Terdaftar. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(12), 1230-1242.
Jaman, U. B. (2022). Prospek Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) sebagai Jaminan Utang. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 1(01), 15-20.
Jan, G. (2023). Applicability of Trademark Laws to Cyberspace: An Analysis. Issue 3 Int'l JL Mgmt. & Human., 6, 463.
Khedir, S. Q. (2019). The Legal Protection and Regulation of Sponsorship Rights in English Football (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).
Labetubun, M. A. H. (2019). Aspek Hukum Hak Cipta Terhadap Buku Elektronik (E- Book) Sebagai Karya Kekayaan Intelektual. Sasi, 24(2), 138-149.
Lim, D. (2021). Trademark Confusion Revealed: An Empirical Anaysis. Am. UL Rev., 71, 1285.
Mike, E. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Terhadap Tindakan Pelanggaran Pembajakan Buku Elektronik Melalui Media Online. Al Imarah: Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam, 2(2).
Missirian, D. E. (2019). The death of moral freedom: How the Trademark Dilution Act has allowed federal courts to punish subjectively-defined immoral secondary use of trademarks. Chi.-Kent J. Intell. Prop., 18, 396.
Mulyani, S. (2012). Pengembangan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Collateral (Agunan) Untuk Mendapatkan Kredit Perbankan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(3), 568-578.
Ramadhan, M. C., Siregar, F. Y. D., & Wibowo, B. F. (2023). Buku Ajar Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.
Rumadan, I. (2020, May). Bad Faith’s Criteria in the Famous Trademark Dispute Settlement That has an Element of Equality in Principle in the Court. In International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH 2020) (pp. 600-608). Atlantis Press.
Saidin, O. K. (2010). Aspek hukum hak kekayaan intelektual:(intellectual property rights).
Sari, M. Y. A. R. (2014). Passing off Dalam Pendaftaran Merek. Jurnal Yudisial, 7(3), 255-272.
Semaun, S. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Perdagangan Barang Dan Jasa. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 14(1), 108-124.
Silvia, H. (2021). Learning Law Through Pleadings of the Rich and Infamous. J. Legal Stud. Educ., 38, 5.
Simunic, K. (2020). Constitutional Law: Courts Should Not Forfeit the Barker Factors in Civil Forfeiture—Olson v. One 1999 Lexus MN License Plate No. 851LDV VIN: JT6HF10U6X0079461, 924 NW 2d 594 (Minn. 2019). Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 46(3), 7.
Vasiu, I., & Vasiu, L. (2022). A Framework for Improved Protection of Trademarks. JL Bus. & Ethics, 28, 18.
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 32 times
Download : 23 times
DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v3i2.4240
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Michaela Michaela
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
