Juridical Analysis of Debt Settlement Through Bankruptcy (Study of Decision 24/Pdt.Sus-Bankrupt/2019/PN Niaga Sby)
), Gusnardi Lie(2), Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra(3),
(1) Universitas Tarumanagara
(2) Universitas Tarumanagara
(3) Universitas Tarumanagara
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Every bankruptcy has legal consequences for both the debtor and the creditor, one of which is the ability to represent the bankrupt debtor in property law matters. As a result, the authority of the debtor is very limited. Therefore, the debtor remains liable for outstanding debts in the event of bankruptcy, and the creditor must use all reasonable efforts to collect outstanding debts. Regarding debt settlement through bankruptcy (Decision of the Surabaya District Court Case PT. Sinar Pembangunan Abadi) to find out the basis for the considerations of the Panel of Judges in case number: 24/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019. This case was originally with the bankruptcy respondent having debts to the bankruptcy applicants that were due and could be collected for severance/compensation payments. This study uses the method of literature review. This type of research data is secondary data. The normative approach to analyzing juridical legal analysis is to resolve issues related to debt settlement difficulties in the consideration that the Commercial Court at the Surabaya District Court has stated that it is proven that it has not fulfilled the legal or debt obligations mentioned above, then the legal consequences (legal consequences) of the bankruptcy respondent can be declared negligent law (ingebreke stelling) can be declared negligent or default on their obligations (counter-performance) in accordance with the provisions of Article 1238 of the Civil Code.
Keywords
References
Asyhaddie Z. & Sutrisno, B. Hukum Perusahaan dan Kepailitan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012,
DR. Niru Anita Sinaga, SH, MH dan Nunuk Sulisrudatin, SH, S.Ip, MSi” Hukum Kepailitan Dan Permasalahannya Di Indonesia” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara,Volume 7 No. 1, September 2016
Imran Nating, Peranan dan Tanggug Jawab Kurator dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2014, h.5.
Irna Nurhayati, Tinjauan Terhadap Undang-Undang Kepailitan (UU No. 4 Tahun 1998), Mimbar Hukum Majalah Berkala Fakultas Hukum UGM No: 32/VI/1999, hal 41
Jackson, TH. Logika dan Batasan Hukum Kepailitan. Buku Jenggot, 2001, 69.
Makmur, Syafrudin. "Kepastian Hukum Kepailitan Bagi Kreditur dan Debitur Pada Pengadilan Niaga Indonesia." Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law 4.2 (2018).
Mulyawan, H. "Fungsi Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Pengawasan Perusahaan Asuransi Kendaraan Bermotor." Jurnal Hukum dan Yurisprudensi Asia 1, no. 1 (2018): 19.
Nugroho, Susanti Adi, and MH SH. Hukum kepailitan di Indonesia: dalam teori dan praktik serta penerapan hukumnya. Kencana, 2018.
Nurdin, A. (2012). Kepailitan BUMN Persero Berdasarkan Asas Kepastian Hukum. Bandung: Alumni.
Robin Panjaitan,” Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgment Rule Terhadap Direksi Yang Melakukan Kebijakan Yang Merugikan Perusahaan. Jurnal Hukum 2021
Rudhy A. Lontoh, Deny Kailimang, Benny Ponto (eds), Penyelesaian Utang Piutang Melalui Kepailitan atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Hutang, Alumni, Bandung, 2011, h.101.
Shubhan, MH. "Penyalahgunaan Permohonan Pailit oleh Kreditur: Kasus Indonesia." Jurnal Internasional Inovasi, Kreativitas, dan Perubahan 10, no. 6 (2019): 195-207.
Sinaga, Niru Anita, and Nunuk Sulisrudatin. "Hukum Kepailitan dan Permasalahannya di Indonesia." Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 7.1 (2018).
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 81 times
Download : 82 times
DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i1.517
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Tiyas Asri Putri, Gusnardi Lie, Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
