Brand Dispute Case at GoTo Company

Authors

  • Alessandro Christian Max Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Gunardi Lie Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i1.520

Keywords:

Brand dispute, GoTo, Infringement

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the GoTo company's brand dispute resolution arrangements, which managed to escape a lawsuit of Rp. 2 trillion related to a brand dispute filed by PT Terbit Financial Technology on November 2, 2021. Trademark rights are special (exclusive) matters. The special rights consist of the right to use and the right to give permission to other people to use the trademark rights. If a person or other party uses the special rights without the permission of the brand owner, then there has been a violation of the trademark rights. If there is a violation of trademark rights, of course there will be laws that can provide sanctions or penalties for violators. In this GoTo case, GoTo was sued by PT Terbit Financial Technology because it was accused of violating brand rights or committing plagiarism. Of course, this has caused many parties to suffer losses, both from the company's and users' side, because GoTo is a company that is quite large and has an impact in Indonesia. Law No. 15 of 2001 concerning Mark is one of the legal remedies that can resolve and become a way out of trademark dispute cases like this. The content of the lawsuit is principally in the form of a claim for compensation and/or termination of all actions related to the use of the mark.

References

file:///C:/Users/Aio/Downloads/21434-73855-1-PB.pdf

http://eprints.ums.ac.id/106365/2/02.%20Naskah%20Publikasi.pdf

https://eprints.uny.ac.id/22029/4/4.BAB%20II.pdf

https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-6119641/kronologi-sengketa-nama-goto-hingga-lolos-dari-gugatan-rp-2-t/2

https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/37595/uu-no-20-tahun-2016

https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/51253/uu-no-21-tahun-1961#:~:text=UU%20No.%2021%20Tahun%201961,Merek%20Perniagaan%20%5BJDIH%20BPK%20RI%5D

https://www.dilmil-jakarta.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Kitab-Undang-Undang-Hukum-Perdata.pdf

https://www.kompas.tv/article/231232/dari-kasus-goto-pahami-hukum-bisnis-merek

https://www.liputan6.com/saham/read/4915734/goto-masuk-pasar-modal-ri-bagaimana-dampaknya-ke-indeks-sektor-saham-teknologi

Downloads

Published

2023-06-01

How to Cite

Max, A. C., Lie, G., & Syailendra Putra, M. R. (2023). Brand Dispute Case at GoTo Company. QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(1), 467–471. https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i1.520

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): June 2023

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).