Juridical Review of the Merger of Gojek and Tokopedia in the Aspect of Unfair Business Competition
),
(1) Universitas Tarumanagara
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Mergers in digital companies are things that have recently become a topic of discussion, concerns about indications of monopolistic practices in them are one of them. As in the merger activity of the digital companies Gojek and Tokopedia which attracted a lot of attention. KPPU is considered to have an indispensable role in supervising and assessing merger activities that have the potential to create a monopoly, especially in digital company mergers. The purpose of this paper is to find out the regulation, supervision, and evaluation by KPPU of monopoly practices in digital company mergers. This writing uses the approach of legislation. The result of this writing is that KPPU has not found any monopolistic practices in the merger of Gojek and Tokopedia companies, by prioritizing analysis of assessment aspects such as aspects of market concentration using the HHI method, barriers to market entry, and potential anti-competitive behavior. With the merger of the GoTo group, access to market share for new digital companies engaged in the same field has not experienced any obstacles at all, nor has there been any discriminatory policy imposed by the GoTo group in carrying out its business against competitors.
Keywords
References
Achulia, O. (2018). Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on Corporate Performance: A Case Study of Silknet Company. Ecoforum, 7(3), 1-6. Retrieved from http:// www.ecoforumjournal.ro/index.php/eco/article/view/832
Anita, ,2021, Merger dan Akuisisi: ”Berbagai Permasalahannya dan Kemungkinan Penyalahgunaannya”, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia,Vol.1 No. 2, September.
Fauzi, A. (2021). Pengawasan Praktek Monopoli Sebagai Bentuk Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Jurnal De Lega Lata, 6(2), 144-153. Retrieved from http://jurnal. umsu.ac.id/index.php/delegalata/article/view/7837
H. Zaenal Asyhadie, 2012, Hukum Bisnis: Prinsip dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.. Hlm. 328
Kalangi, B.E. (2017). Prosedur Penanganan Monopoli dan Persaingan Curang Serta Sanksi Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Lex Crimen, VI(1), 167-174. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat. ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/15099
Mustofa, I. (2016). Jendela Logika dalam Berfikir: Deduksi dan Induksi sebagai Dasar Penalaran Ilmiah. Jurnal El-Banat, 6(2), 122-142. Retrieved from http:// ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/susi/index.php/elbanat/article/view/2875
Nurdin. D, 2021, ”Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Sebelum dan Sesudah Akuisisi Pada Perusahaan Go Publik di Indonesia”, Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, Th 1.Vol.3.
Payamta dan Setiawan, 2021, ”Analisis Pengaruh Merger dan Akuisisi Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Publik di Indonesia”, Jurnal Riset akuntansi Indonesia, Vol.7, No.3
Payamta, dan Doddy, S., 2021,”Analisis Pengaruh Merger dan Akuisisi Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Publik di Indonesia”, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, Vol. 7, No. 3, September : 265-282
Putri, N.I., Herdian, Y., Suharya, Y., & Munarwan, Z. (2021). Kajian Empiris pada Transformasi Bisnis Digital. Jurnal Artabis, 7(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https:// jurnal.plb.ac.id/index.php/atrabis/article/view/600
Rachmawati, E.N., dan Eduardus T., 2001,”Analisis Pengaruh Pengumuman Merger dan Akuisisi Terhadap Abnormal Return Saham Perusahaan Target di BEJ”, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, Manajemen, dan Ekonomi, Vol. 1, No. 2, Agustus :153-170.
Saiful, 2021,”Abnormal Return Perusahaan Target dan Industri Sejenis Sekitar Pengumuman Merger dan Akuisisi”, Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Manajemen, Vol. 3, No. 2, Agustus.
Santo, P.A.F.D. (2011). Merger, Akuisisi dan Konsolidasi dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Binus Business Review, 2(1), 423-433. Retrieved from https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/BBR/article/view/1149
Santoso, Kanto, 2021, Praktek, Manfaat, Dampak Akuisisi Ditinjau dari Perusahaan Publik dan Pemegang Saham. Artikel dalam Makalah Seminar ”Akuisisi dan Dampak Globalisasi Terhadap Pasar Modal Indonesia”, Jakarta, 25 Agustus.
Sapitri, B.E. (2015). Kewenangan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam Penanganan Perkara Persaingan Usaha (Studi Perbandingan di Indonesia dengan Negara Common Law System). Jurnal IUS, III(7), 139-158. Retrieved from https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/204
Soundarva, M.B., Lavanya, S.M., & Hemalatha, S. (2018). Merger and Acquisition of Business Organization and its Impact on Human Resources. Journal of Business Strategy, Finance and Management, 1(1), 69-72, DOI:http://dx.doi. org/10.12944/JBSFM.01.0102.07
Sudjana, S. (2016). Merger dalam Perspektif Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Berdasarkan UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 1(1), 104-123. Retrieved from https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/positum/ article/view/499
Tarigan, A.A. (2016). Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat dalam Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi dan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Mercatoria, 9(1), 54-69. Retrieved from https://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/mercatoria/article/view/351.
Wibowo, Amin, dan Yulita, M.P., 2021,”Pengaruh Pengumuman Merger dan Akuisisi Terhadap Return Saham Perusahaan Akuisitor dan Non Akuisitor dalam Sektor Industri yang Sama di BEJ”, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, Vol. 16, No. 4, : 372-387.
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 112 times
Download : 197 times
DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i1.542
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Naufal Tunggul Alam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
