Pengaruh Teori Keynesian Tentang Pengelolaan Pendapatan Terhadap Kemandirian Finansial Mahasiswa di Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Medan

Authors

  • Mica Siar Meiriza Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Vingky Dwi Pratama Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Vivi Safira Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Mentari Rezeki Ramadhani Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Zulfa Afifah Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Tasya Manurung Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/ijedr.v3i1.4143

Keywords:

Teori Keynesian, Kemandirian Finansial, Mahasiswa, Pendidikan Ekonomi, Pengelolaan Pendapatan

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji pengaruh teori Keynesian tentang pengelolaan pendapatan terhadap kemandirian finansial mahasiswa Pendidikan Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Medan. Teori Keynesian dipilih karena relevansinya dalam menjelaskan perilaku konsumsi dan tabungan. Menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan teknik purposive sampling, 31 mahasiswa semester 5 dilibatkan dalam survei. Analisis regresi linear sederhana menunjukkan pengaruh positif dan signifikan (R²=0,515, p<0,001) antara pemahaman teori Keynesian dan kemandirian finansial. Hasil ini mengindikasikan bahwa 51,5% variasi kemandirian finansial dapat dijelaskan oleh pemahaman teori Keynesian. Kesimpulannya, peningkatan pemahaman teori ekonomi makro berkorelasi dengan peningkatan kemampuan pengelolaan keuangan pribadi mahasiswa, menekankan pentingnya pendidikan ekonomi yang aplikatif di tingkat perguruan tinggi.

References

Blanchard, O., Amighini, A., & Giavazzi, F. (2017). Macroeconomics: A European perspective. Pearson.

Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), 1-5.

Cole, S., Paulson, A., & Shastry, G. K. (2016). High school curriculum and financial outcomes: A quasi-experimental analysis of personal finance and mathematics courses. Journal of Human Resources, 51(3), 656-698.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Dew, J., & Xiao, J. J. (2011). The financial management behavior scale: Development and validation. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 22(1), 43-59.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

Grohmann, A., Klühs, T., & Menkhoff, L. (2018). Does financial literacy improve financial inclusion? Cross country evidence. World Development, 111, 84-96.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Cengage Learning.

Jappelli, T., & Padula, M. (2013). Investment in financial literacy and saving decisions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8), 2779-2792.

Johnson, E., & Sherraden, M. S. (2007). From financial literacy to financial capability among youth. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 34, 119-146.

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan.

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5-44.

Mankiw, N. G. (2019). Macroeconomics (10th ed.). Worth Publishers.

McKinsey & Company. (2021). The future of work after COVID-19. McKinsey Global Institute.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2019). Survei nasional literasi dan inklusi keuangan 2019. OJK.

Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21-33.

Skidelsky, R. (2009). Keynes: The return of the master. PublicAffairs.

Stiglitz, J. E., & Walsh, C. E. (2006). Economics (4th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.

Wright, K. B. (2017). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), JCMC1034.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-29

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Januari 2025

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to IJEDR: Indonesian Journal Of Education And Development Research Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to IJEDR: Indonesian Journal Of Education And Development Research a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.