Transformasi Digital Dalam Pelayanan Notaris: Analisis Hukum Terhadap Keabsahan Akta yang Dibuat Secara Elektronik

Authors

  • A’ishah Mutiara Ramadhan Universitas Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/jalakotek.v2i2.6056

Keywords:

Digital Transformation, Notary Position Act, UU ITE

Abstract

This study examines the legal framework governing electronic deeds in Indonesia’s notarial practice through a normative juridical approach, supported by statutory, conceptual, historical, and comparative analyses. It focuses on the regulatory gap between the Notary Position Act (UUJN) and the Electronic Information and Transactions Act (UU ITE), which creates uncertainty regarding the validity of electronic notarial deeds. Using Gustav Radbruch’s Theory of Legal Certainty, the research emphasises the need for clear and reliable laws to support digital transformation in notarisation. Comparative analysis includes Remote Online Notarization (RON) in the United States and digital notary systems in the Netherlands and Australia, highlighting mechanisms such as blockchain technology and interoperable digital platforms. The study proposes harmonising Indonesian regulations, adopting secure technologies, and enhancing notaries’ competencies to ensure security and legal recognition of electronic deeds. These measures aim to provide legal certainty and protect stakeholders in Indonesia’s evolving digital notarial landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexy, R. (2022). Gustav Radbruch’s concept of law. Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika v Košiciach. (Akses melalui JStor: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2181218 )

Alkatiri, N. H., Putra, M. F. M., & Ongko, K. (2023). A Legal Perspective: Implementing An Electronic Notarization System In Indonesia In The Post-Pandemic Era. JALREV, 5(2), 332–355.

As Sauri, F. I., & Yunanto. (2024). Urgensi Pembaharuan Cyber Notary Dalam Undang Undang Jabatan Notaris Berdasarkan Perkembangan Teknologi. Notarius, 17(1), 401–414.

Australian Government. (2021). Digital ID system: Providing secure, convenient, and voluntary online identity verification. From https://www.digitalidsystem.gov.au

Cahayani, D. (2025). Implikasi hukum digitalisasi akta notaris terhadap validitas hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, 4(5), 813–826.

Chroust, A.-H. (1944). The philosophy of law of Gustav Radbruch. The Philosophical Review, 53(1), 23–45.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of State. (2025). Electronic Or Remote Notarization. Government of Pennsylvania.

Damayanti, R. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Hak Dan Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Era Digitalisasi: Analisis Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Dan Regulasi Tambahan. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 5(3), 1242–1249.

Hukumonline. (2025). Legalitas Penggunaan Tanda Tangan Elektronik Oleh Notaris. Klinik Hukumonline. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/legalitas-penggunaan-tanda-tangan-elektronik-oleh-notaris-lt5cd238184b299/

Kementerian Kehakiman dan Keamanan Belanda. (2019).

LawTeacher. (2025). Radbruch’s formula. Retrieved May 1, 2025, from https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/criminal-law/radbruchs-formula.php

Leawoods, H. (2000). Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2, 489–519.

Maharani, Y. Z. Z., Khoidin, K., & Tektona, R. I. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Pembuatan Akta Otentik Melalui Sistem Elektronik. Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia, 2(1), 49–58.

Maulana, F., & Yahya, R. (2023). Akibat Hukum Terhadap Akta Notaris Yang Dibuat Secara Elektronik Menurut Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pamulang.

Moleong, L. J. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

National Notary Association. (2020). Remote online notarization: How to become a remote online notary. from https://www.nationalnotary.org/knowledge-center/remote- online-notary/how-to-become-a-remote-online-notary

Purnamasari, S. A. (2020). Pembuatan akta notaris secara elektronik berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris & Undang-Undang ITE (Skripsi, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mataram).

Putra, Merdi Aditya, & Husein, Siti Hajati (2022). Peran Notaris Dan Keabsahan Akta Rups Yang Dilaksanakan Secara Elektronik. The Juris, 6(1), ISSN 2580-8370.

Rizkianti, W., Hutabarat, S. M. D., Nugroho, A. A., Firdaus, M. B., & Latri, A. A. (2025). Cyber notary di Indonesia: Tantangan, peluang dan kebutuhan rekonstruksi hukum. Notaire, 8(1), 123–140.

Rizqiya, A., & Mahfud, M. A. (2024). Perkembangan Cyber Notary Di Indonesia Dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Notaris Dalam Era Digital. Notarius, 17(3).

State of Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions. (2024). Remote online notary. https://dfi.wi.gov/Pages/ConsumerServices/NotaryPublic/RemoteOnlineNotary.asp

Tubagus, Dwi, Raffles, Raffles, & Syamsir, Syamsir (2023). Kekuatan Hukum Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuat Secara Elektronik (Cyber Notary) Dalam Prespektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Recital Review, 5(1), 151-173, ISSN 2623-2928, Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian masyarakat Universitas Jambi.

Yudha, Frita Apriliana (2024). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penggunaan dan Pembuatan Akta Notaris Secara Elektronik Dengan Menggunakan Artifisial Intelegensi (AI). Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 15-25, ISSN 3032-5854, Asosiasi Seni Desain dan Komunikasi Visual Indonesia.

Yurika, V. Y. (2025). Pengaturan Penerapan E-Signature Pada Akta Otentik Sebagai Pengamanan Inovasi Digital Di Indonesia. Otentik’s: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 7(1), 110–117.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-28

How to Cite

Ramadhan, A. M. (2025). Transformasi Digital Dalam Pelayanan Notaris: Analisis Hukum Terhadap Keabsahan Akta yang Dibuat Secara Elektronik. Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology, 2(2), 922–932. https://doi.org/10.57235/jalakotek.v2i2.6056

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juli 2025

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to Jalakotek: Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to Jalakotek: Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.