Ratio Decidendi Criminal Imposition Refund of State Losses for Corruption Crimes (Research Study at the High Prosecutor's Office of the Riau Islands)

Roy Remulus Jack Toar Kuhon(1), Soerya Respationo(2), Erniyanti Erniyanti(3), Dahlan Dahlan(4),


(1) Universitas Batam
(2) Universitas Batam
(3) Universitas Batam
(4) Universitas Batam
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Corruption is a form of economic crime that causes losses to state finances and places these losses as a material element that must be proven at trial. In criminal acts that are classified as material offenses, the loss of material elements in the act committed is the reason for the abolition of criminal liability. However, on a practical level, perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption who have recovered state financial losses are still burdened with criminal responsibility based on Decision Number: 15/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN.TPG. Departing from this background, this article aims to find out: what is the existence of the crime of returning state financial losses, what is the chronology of the a quo decision, and what is the ratio of decisions of the panel of judges in deciding the a quo case. This paper is a form of normative legal research that uses three types of approaches in conducting analysis. The approaches in question are: statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of the analysis of the three formulations raised in this paper are as follows: First, the crime of returning state financial losses is placed as an additional crime in the Indonesian criminal law instrumentarium. Second, those convicted of criminal acts of corruption based on Decision Number: 15/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN.TPG legally without any doubt have violated the provisions contained in Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Law on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Third, based on the examination at trial, the prosecutor's indictment, and the deliberations of the panel of judges, the perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption are sentenced to prison, fines, and restitution of state financial losses.


Keywords


Return of State Losses, Corruption Crimes, Ratio Decidendi

References


Adnan Topan Husoso, “Catatan Kritis atas Usaha Pengembalian kerugian negara Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Perampasan Aset Hasil TPK”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 2010.

Hanafi Amrani dan Mahrus Ali, Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perkembangan dan Penerapannya, Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Jeffrey Simser, The Significance on Money Laundering: The Example of The Philippines, Journal of Money Laundering, Vol 9 No 3, 2006.

Subarsyah, “Pelaksanaan Asas Hukum Retroaktif Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Pidana dalam Rangka Efektivitas Pengembalian Keuangan Negara”, Jurnal Soshum Insentif, ISSN 2655-268X.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undnag-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 tentang Perbendaharaan Negara.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Putusan Nomor: 15/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN.TPG

Pusat Edukasi Antikorupsi, “Kasus-Kasus Korupsi di Indonesia”, https://aclc.kpk.go.id/materi/berpikir-kritis-terhadap-korupsi/infografis/kasus-kasus-korupsi-di-idonesia, 12 Juli 2021.

“Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia, 2004-2020”, https://lokadat.beritagar.id/chart/preview/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-indonesia-2004-2020-1611921280, 12 Juli 2021.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 97 times
PDF Download : 79 times

DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v3i1.1422

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Roy Remulus Jack Toar Kuhon, Soerya Respationo, Erniyanti Erniyanti, Dahlan Dahlan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.