Judicial Analysis of Violent Crimes (Barelang Police Case Study)

Abstract

Article 28D paragraph (1) of the Third Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia affirms that every individual has the right to be recognized, assured protection, and obtain fair legal certainty, as well as equal treatment before the law. The normative juridical research method is descriptive-analytical, conducted by examining literature, legislation, and utilizing legal enforcement theory, Criminal Theory, and Islamic Justice Theory as the issues examined. The research aims to analyze the legal aspects of the implementation of the crime of Robbery with Violence in the verdict number: 344/Pid.B/2019/PN Btm. With the formulation of the problems: How is the legal analysis of the application of the crime of robbery with violence in the criminal case verdict Number: 344/Pid.B/2019/PN Btm, What are the judge's considerations in delivering a verdict on the Crime of Robbery with Violence in the Criminal Case Number: 344/Pid.B/2019/PN Btm. The research findings and discussion indicate that The legal analysis of the application of the crime of Robbery with Violence in the criminal case verdict Number: 344/Pid.B/2019/PN Btm under Article 365 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code (KUHP) on robbery with violence resulted in a sentence of one year and two months imprisonment with a fine of five thousand rupiahs, which the imposed penalty by the panel of judges was considered too lenient. The maximum criminal penalty under Article 365 of the Criminal Code is nine years. The judge's considerations in delivering a verdict on the Crime of Robbery with Violence involve juridical considerations, where the defendant's actions are proven convincingly and meet all elements in Article 365 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. Non-juridical considerations include the absence of factors that could eliminate criminal liability, either as justifying or mitigating factors, thereby holding the defendant accountable for their actions.