Comparative Analysis of Biological Assets Before and After PSAK 69 on Taufik Hidayat Cattle Farms
), Patricia Yosephine Syahrani Marbun(2), Widya Ayu Utami(3), Nasirwan Nasirwan(4),
(1) Universitas Negeri Medan
(2) Universitas Negeri Medan
(3) Universitas Negeri Medan
(4) Universitas Negeri Medan
Corresponding Author
Abstract
This research aims to compare the application of PSAK 69 before and after it’s implementation in Taufik Hidayat’s cattle farming business. The main objective is to compare the accounting treatments related to the recognition, measurement, and presentation of biological assets in financial statement. The research method employed is a qualitative approach using primary and secondary data. Data were obtained through direct interviews with the owner of the cattle farming business Taufik Hidayat, as well as observation and documentation at the research site. Additional, literature review from books, journals, and articles was conducted. The analysis results indicate that before PSAK 69, Taufik Hidayat’s farm used recognition and measurement methods based on historical cost. However, after the implementation of PSAK 69, the farm shifted to the fair value method, which affected the sensitivity of biological assets values to market changes. Disclosure and presentation of biological assets also began to comply with PSAK 69 provisions, although there is still room for improvement. Overall. The implementation of PSAK 69 brings significant changes in the accounting treatment of biological assets in Taufik Hidayat’s cattle farming business.
Keywords
References
Anggraini, V. R., & Hastuti. (2020). Analisis Penerapan PSAK 69 atas Aset Biologis di PT Perkebunan Nusantara VIII. Prosiding Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar, 914-919.
Batubara, R. H. (2019). Analisis Perlakuan Akuntansi Aset Biologis Berdasarkan Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan(Psak) No. 69 Tentang Agrikultur Padapt. Perkebunan Nusantara Iii Medan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Kontemporer, 9-22.
Deloitte. (2020, May 14). IAS Plus. IAS 41 - Agriculture.
DJPb Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2020, May 29). Perlakuan Akuntansi Aset Biologis Menurut SAP dan SAK.
Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2014). Intermediate Accounting: IFRS Edition, 2nd Edition. USA: New Jersey : John Wiley and sons.
Putri, A. A., Anggrani, D., & PP, H. (2022). Analisis Penerapan Psak 69 Terhadap Aset Biologis Pada Pt. Harta Mulia Kabupaten Blitar. Prosiding Nasional, 134-141.
Rahmani, A. D., Ulupui, I. G., Handarini, D., & Nasution, H. (2021). Perbandingan Perlakuan Akuntansi Aset Biologis Berdasarkan Psak 16 Dan Psak 69 Pada Perusahaan Agrikultur. Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 99-115.
Simanjuntak, S., Lindrianasari, L., Kesumaningrum, N. D., & Oktavia, R. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Regulasi Di Sektor Pertanian Sebelum Dan Sesudah Implementasi Psak 69 Agrikultur. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini, 252-263.
Wardoyo, D. U., Mirela, D. S., Fauzi, E. A., N, H. T., & Altsany, R. (2023). Analisis Penerapan PSAK 69 Pada Perusahaan Sektor Perkebunan Yang Terdaftar Pada BEI Tahun 2017-2018. Jurnal Ilmiah Multimedia, 3215-3222.
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 58 times
Download : 20 times
DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v3i2.2756
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jey Bremana Ramadhan Lubis, Patricia Yosephine Syahrani Marbun, Widya Ayu Utami, Nasirwan Nasirwan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
