Criminal Liability of Perpetrators of Embezzlement in Position at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung (Study of Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns)
), Yulia Hesti(2), Bayu Chandra Wijaya(3),
(1) Universitas Bandar Lampung
(2) Universitas Bandar Lampung
(3) Universitas Bandar Lampung
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Among several criminal acts related to property and goods, there is a crime known as embezzlement where abuse of trust dominates as the main element in the occurrence of this crime. The problem in this research is what factors cause the perpetrator to commit the crime of embezzlement in his position at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung based on Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns, What is the criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of embezzlement of office at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung based on Decree Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns. The factor that caused the defendant to commit embezzlement was due to economic factors where the defendant wanted to control the goods and then sell them and the money from the sale would be divided into three and the money would be used by the defendant for their daily needs. The defendant is responsible for his actions pursuant to Article 374 of the Penal Code. Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) 1 of the Criminal Code, the defendant was sentenced to nine months in prison.
Keywords
References
Abintoro Prakoso, 2013, Kriminologi dan Hukum Pidana, Laksbang Grafika, Yogyakarta
Anang Priyanto, 2012, Kriminologi , Penerbit Ombak, Yogyakarta
Andi Hamzah. 1993. Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, Jakarta, Pradnya Paramita
Dewi Kurnia Sari. 2020. Perlindungan Hak Asasi Tersangka Dalam Penyidikan Kepolisian Di Polres Banjar, Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB Ende Hasbi Nassarudin, 2016, Kriminologi , CV. Pustaka Setia, Bandung
Hj. Tien S. Hulukati dan Gialdah Tapiansari B. 2006. Hukum Pidana Jilid 1, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan, Bandung
Mahendri Massie. 2017. Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Menggunakan Jabatan Berdasarkan Pasal 415 KUHP, Jurnal lex crimen, Vol. 6, No. 7
Mahfud Junaedi. 2017. Paradigma Baru Filsafat Pendidikan Islam, Depok, Kencana
Muladi dan Dwidja Priyanto. 1991. Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana, Penerbit Sekolah Hukum, Bandung
P.A.F. Lamintang. 1997. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, hlm. 2-3
Rendi H Pratama, Sri Sulastri, dan Rudi Saprudin Darwis. 2015. Perlindungan Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum, Prosiding Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Vol. 2, No. I
Rosa Agustina. 2003. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Jakarta, Pasca Sarjana FH Universitas Indonesia
Tessalonika Novela Pangaila. 2016. Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Umum. Lex Privatum, Vol. 4 No. 3
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Hasil Amandemen Keempat
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Pidana
Van Hammel. 2003. Rangkaian Sari Kuliah Hukum Pidana 1, Reflika Aditama, Bandung
Yesmil Anwar. 2010. Kriminologi, Rafika Aditama, Bandung
Zulfi Diane Zaini. 2012. Perspektif Hukum Sebagai Landasan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Indonesia (Sebuah Pendekatan Filsafat), Jurnal Hukum, Vol. XXVIII, No. 2
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 114 times
Download : 206 times
DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v2i1.295
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Zulfi Diane Zaini, Yulia Hesti, Bayu Chandra Wijaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
