Criminal Liability of Perpetrators of Embezzlement in Position at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung (Study of Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns)

Zulfi Diane Zaini(1), Yulia Hesti(2), Bayu Chandra Wijaya(3),


(1) Universitas Bandar Lampung
(2) Universitas Bandar Lampung
(3) Universitas Bandar Lampung
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Among several criminal acts related to property and goods, there is a crime known as embezzlement where abuse of trust dominates as the main element in the occurrence of this crime. The problem in this research is what factors cause the perpetrator to commit the crime of embezzlement in his position at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung based on Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns, What is the criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of embezzlement of office at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung based on Decree Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns. The factor that caused the defendant to commit embezzlement was due to economic factors where the defendant wanted to control the goods and then sell them and the money from the sale would be divided into three and the money would be used by the defendant for their daily needs. The defendant is responsible for his actions pursuant to Article 374 of the Penal Code. Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) 1 of the Criminal Code, the defendant was sentenced to nine months in prison.


Keywords


Criminal Liability, Embezzlement, In Position

References


Abintoro Prakoso, 2013, Kriminologi dan Hukum Pidana, Laksbang Grafika, Yogyakarta

Anang Priyanto, 2012, Kriminologi , Penerbit Ombak, Yogyakarta

Andi Hamzah. 1993. Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, Jakarta, Pradnya Paramita

Dewi Kurnia Sari. 2020. Perlindungan Hak Asasi Tersangka Dalam Penyidikan Kepolisian Di Polres Banjar, Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB Ende Hasbi Nassarudin, 2016, Kriminologi , CV. Pustaka Setia, Bandung

Hj. Tien S. Hulukati dan Gialdah Tapiansari B. 2006. Hukum Pidana Jilid 1, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan, Bandung

Mahendri Massie. 2017. Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Menggunakan Jabatan Berdasarkan Pasal 415 KUHP, Jurnal lex crimen, Vol. 6, No. 7

Mahfud Junaedi. 2017. Paradigma Baru Filsafat Pendidikan Islam, Depok, Kencana

Muladi dan Dwidja Priyanto. 1991. Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana, Penerbit Sekolah Hukum, Bandung

P.A.F. Lamintang. 1997. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, hlm. 2-3

Rendi H Pratama, Sri Sulastri, dan Rudi Saprudin Darwis. 2015. Perlindungan Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum, Prosiding Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Vol. 2, No. I

Rosa Agustina. 2003. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Jakarta, Pasca Sarjana FH Universitas Indonesia

Tessalonika Novela Pangaila. 2016. Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Umum. Lex Privatum, Vol. 4 No. 3

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Hasil Amandemen Keempat

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Pidana

Van Hammel. 2003. Rangkaian Sari Kuliah Hukum Pidana 1, Reflika Aditama, Bandung

Yesmil Anwar. 2010. Kriminologi, Rafika Aditama, Bandung

Zulfi Diane Zaini. 2012. Perspektif Hukum Sebagai Landasan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Indonesia (Sebuah Pendekatan Filsafat), Jurnal Hukum, Vol. XXVIII, No. 2


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 146 times
PDF Download : 218 times

DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v2i1.295

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Zulfi Diane Zaini, Yulia Hesti, Bayu Chandra Wijaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.