Problems of Tax Collection by the Tax Mafia in the Perspective of Tax Law

Authors

  • Gevan Naufal Wala Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Rasji Rasji Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v2i2.595

Keywords:

Tax Court, Judicial Power, Tax Court Competency

Abstract

This journal will explain further about the tax mechanism that takes place in the tax collection process and also the provisions related to the tax sustainability mechanism so far. Tax collection can result in tax disputes between taxpayers and tax collectors. According to Law Number 14 of 2002 concerning the Tax Court (hereinafter referred to as the Tax Court Law) Article 1 number 5 states that a tax dispute is a dispute that arises in the field of taxation between a taxpayer or tax bearer and an authorized official as a result of the issuance of a decision that will filed an appeal or lawsuit to the tax court based on taxation laws and regulations, including lawsuits for the implementation of billing based on the Tax Collection Law with a forced letter. To maximize profits and avoid losses, taxpayers do tax evasion intentionally. This is due to the lack of concern for the state. The absence or lack of public awareness about taxpayers paying taxes to the state is a form of resistance. The importance of paying taxes, the benefits of paying taxes, and the sanctions that will be imposed if non-compliant taxpayers are not socialized by the government to the public as taxpayers. Therefore, regulations and sanctions related to tax avoidance need to be emphasized in order to provide a deterrent effect for tax avoiders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agnes, F. A. (2021). Literature Review: Analisis Peran Pajak sebagai Upaya Perwujudan Pembangunan Nasional. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi Bisnis Digital, Ekonomi Kreatif, dan Entrepreneur, 81-89.

Brotodihardjo, R. S. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Pajak. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Erly Suandy, Hukum Pajak, Edisi Kedua (Salemba Empat 2005). Galang Asmara, Peradilan Pajak & Lembaga Penyanderaan (Gijzeling) Dalam Hukum Pajak di Indonesia, (LasBang PRESSindo 2006).

Hertanto Wijaya, Asas Keadilan Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak Badan Usaha Terhadap Dirjen Pajak Berdasarkan Hukum Pajak Indonesia (Repository Universitas Pasundan 2016).

Ibrahim Saifudin dan Pranoto K, Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (Jaya Persada 1984).

Ilyas, W. B. & Richard Burton, Hukum Pajak Edisi 3, Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2007.

Ismail Rumadan, Laporan Penelitian Kedudukan Pengadilan Pajak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia (Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil Mahkamah Agung RI 2011).

Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia, Pph (Pajak Penghasilan) (Direktorat Jenderal Pajak 2013).

M. Asrun, Krisis Peradilan di Bawah Mahkamah Agung, (ELSAM 2014)

Muqodim. (1999). Perpajakan Buku Satu. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Mustaqiem. (2008). Pajak Daerah dalam Transisi Otonomi Daerah. Jakarta: FH UII Press.

Soemitro, R. (1988). Pengantar Singkat Hukum Pajak, Cetakan-2, Bandung : PT. Eresco, 1988.

Suryatni, L. (2020). Undang – Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2006 tentang Kewarganegaraan Republik Indonesia Dalam Melindungi Hak Perempuan dan Anak (Perspektif: Perkawinan Antara Warga Negara Indonesia dan Warga Negara Asing). Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 10(2).

Wad, E.C.S dan G. Godfrey Philips, Constitutional Law: An Outline of The Lawa and Practice of The Constitution, Including Central and Local Government, the Citizen and the State and Administrative Law (Longmans 1965).

Downloads

Published

2023-07-04

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): July 2023

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.