Adversity Quotient Generasi Z di Universitas X

Authors

  • Ni Putu Surya Pradnya Utami Dhyana Pura University, Indonesia
  • I Rai Hardika Dhyana Pura University, Indonesia
  • Yashinta Levy Septiarly Dhyana Pura University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v5i1.7010

Abstract

This study explores the level of adversity quotient (AQ) among Generation Z students at Universitas X, Indonesia, who are often labeled as the strawberry generation for being perceived as fragile in facing challenges. The research aims to describe the distribution of AQ and identify differences based on demographic factors such as gender and age. Using a quantitative descriptive approach, data were collected from 356 respondents through a validated questionnaire consisting of 32 items measuring four AQ dimensions: control, origin and ownership, reach, and endurance. The findings reveal a polarized distribution, with the majority of students in the very high (30.1%) and very low (29.2%) categories. Independent samples t-test indicated significant gender differences, with female students showing higher AQ than male students. Moreover, Kruskal–Wallis analysis showed age-based differences, where students aged 19–21 years recorded higher AQ levels compared to older groups. These results highlight the need for targeted interventions to enhance resilience among students with lower AQ.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aliza, N., & Oktafiani, M. (2021). Hubungan kecerdasan emosional dengan adversity quotient pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi, 14(2), 101–112.

Andelin, M., & Rusu, A. (2016). Gender differences in adversity quotient among university students. International Journal of Psychology, 51(4), 275–283.

Anggriyani, A. N., & Mulansari, M. (2025). Stereotipe Gen Z di dunia profesional: Antara realitas dan kesalahpahaman.

Balan, S., & Vreja, L. O. (2018). Generation Z: Challenges for management and leadership. In Proceedings of the 12th International Management Conference (pp. 879–999).

Cheng, Y. (2018). Strawberry generation: The fragile youth of Taiwan. Taipei: Academic Press.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.

Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Estianingrum, N. M., & Listiara, A. (2016). Adversity quotient pada mahasiswa yang aktif berorganisasi. Jurnal Empati, 5(1), 82–87. doi.org/10.14291/empati.v5i1.14291

Hartinah, S., Patimah, L., Faruk, A., Zulkarnain, F., Mardikawati, B., & Prastawa, S. (2024). Inovasi pendidikan berkarakter menciptakan generasi emas 2045. Journal on Education, 6(2), 13230–13237.

Kasali, R. (2017). Strawberry generation. Jakarta: Mizan.

Mahayani, N. W. A. (2023). Perbedaan tingkat adversity quotient mahasiswa di Bali ditinjau dari urutan kelahiran dan jenis kelamin. Universitas Dhyana Pura.

Muslimah, F., & Satwika, P. (2019). Optimisme dan adversity quotient pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Insight, 7(1), 25–34.

Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2021). The new workforce: Adaptability and retention challenges. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), 100–115.

Patel, R., & Patel, P. (2023). Adversity profile of higher secondary school students: Influence of gender, siblings, and family aspects. Gap Bodhi Taru Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(1), 40–44. doi.org/10.37897/JBM2023

Permatasari, M., & Murdiono, M. (2022). The urgency of political ethics of Pancasila for the millennial generation towards Golden Indonesia 2045. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 7(4).

Phoolka, S., & Kaur, N. (2012). Adversity quotient: A new paradigm to explore. International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies, 3(4), 67–78.

Prasetyawati, R., Utami, D., & Wulandari, S. (2021). Optimisme pada mahasiswa perempuan dan kaitannya dengan daya juang. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, 9(3), 211–220.

Primack, B. A., Swanier, B., Georgiopoulos, A. M., Land, S. R., & Fine, M. J. (2017). Association between social media use and depression among young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(6), 729–735.

Purnomo, A., dkk. (2022). Perbedaan adversity quotient ditinjau dari jenis kelamin pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Character, 3(1), 12–21. Universitas Negeri Surabaya. ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/character/article/view/45832

Santrock, J. W. (2019). Life-span development (17th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Santrock, J. W. (2021). Life-span development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Sari, I. P., Ifdil, I., & Yendi, F. M. (2020). Konsep nomophobia pada remaja Generasi Z. JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia), 5(1), 21. doi.org/10.29210/3003414000

Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity quotient: Turning obstacles into opportunities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Suwarno, D., dkk. (2018). Perzpective. Semarang: Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata.

Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(1), 2–30. doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1

Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood. New York: Atria Books.

Utama, I. K. A. B., & Surya, I. B. K. (2019). Pengaruh religiusitas, adversity quotient dan lingkungan kerja non fisik terhadap stres kerja. E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana, 8(5), 3138–3165. doi.org/10.24843/EJMUNUD.2019.v08.i05.p20

Win, S. Y., Naing, T. T., & Oo, T. T. (2020). Adversity quotient and academic stress of students. Dagon University Research Journal, 11(1), 1–12.

Ye, Y., Hu, R., Ni, Z., Jiang, N., & Jiang, X. (2021). Analysis of adversity quotient of nursing students in Macao. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 668. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628996

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.