Historical Analysis of World War II and its Implications for the Readiness of the RSPAD Medical Laboratory

Authors

  • Endra Tri Prabowo Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Arifuddin Uksan Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Yudi Subiantoro Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v5i1.8091

Keywords:

World War II, Military Medical Laboratory, Military Health Readiness, CRP, KSA

Abstract

World War II marked a critical turning point in the development of military medical laboratories, transforming them from purely clinical support units into strategic elements of national defense systems. Operational pressures on the battlefield, high rates of infectious diseases, and the threat of biological weapons stimulated innovations such as field laboratories, rapid diagnostic methods, mass production of antibiotics, and military sanitation protocols. These historical lessons remain highly relevant in addressing contemporary health threats, making it essential to examine their implications for the readiness of the Medical Laboratory of RSPAD Gatot Soebroto as the primary military hospital of the Indonesian Army. This study aims to analyze the development of military medical laboratories during World War II and its implications for the readiness of laboratory infrastructure, medical human resources, and operational protocols at RSPAD. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through interviews, analysis of official documents, academic literature review, and observation, and examined using data triangulation. The analytical framework is based on the Military Health System, particularly the Clinical Readiness Program (CRP) and Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSA), supported by perspectives from defense studies and Historical Institutionalism. The findings indicate that World War II functioned as a critical juncture that shaped patterns of military medical laboratory readiness, subsequently adopted by RSPAD through strengthened laboratory infrastructure, enhanced medical personnel readiness, and the implementation of biosurveillance and outbreak response protocols. The study concludes that effective medical laboratory readiness can only be achieved through the integrated development of infrastructure, human resources, and operational protocols. It is recommended that RSPAD strengthen the sustained implementation of CRP and KSA while further developing mobile laboratory capabilities and expanding health defense cooperation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Harrison, M. (2004). Medicine and victory: British military medicine in the Second World War. Oxford University Press.

Holt, D. B., et al. (2021). Clinical readiness in the Military Health System: Measuring knowledge, skills, and abilities for operational medicine. Military Medicine, 186(Suppl 1), 15–21.

Holt, D. B., Williams, M., & Brown, R. (2021). Clinical readiness in the Military Health System: Development of Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities metrics. Military Medicine, 186(Suppl. 1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaa533

Holt, N. R., Grindlay, J., & Ball, J. (2021). Clinical readiness in military health systems: A framework for sustaining medical capability. Military Medicine, 186(Suppl 3), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab123

Hoyt, E. (2015). Medicine at war: Disease and the medical profession during World War II. Rowman & Littlefield.

Kass, A. M. (1987). The development of penicillin in World War II: Historical perspectives. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 42(4), 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/42.4.467

Kass, E. H. (1987). The impact of World War II on American medicine. American Journal of Public Health, 77(11), 1453–1458. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.77.11.1453

Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Buku putih pertahanan Indonesia. Kementerian Pertahanan RI.

Steinmo, S. (2008). Historical institutionalism. In D. della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences (pp. 118–138). Cambridge University Press.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369

Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S. (1992). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 1–32). Cambridge University Press.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2019 tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional untuk Pertahanan Negara.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2002 tentang Pertahanan Negara.

Walker, D. I. (2004). The Walker Dip: Maintaining military medical readiness during peacetime. Military Medicine, 169(12), 921–926. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED.169.12.921

Walker, P. (2004). The “Walker Dip” and maintenance of combat medical skills in peacetime. Journal of Military Medicine, 169(5), 347–352.

Walker, P. (2004). The “Walker Dip” and maintenance of combat medical skills in peacetime. Journal of Military Medicine, 169(5), 347–352.

Wintermeyer, J. (2016). Military medical laboratories in World War II: Innovation under operational pressure. Journal of Military History, 80(3), 721–748.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.