Jesus Christ as the Foundation of Objective Truth: A Theological Response to Postmodern Relativism

Authors

  • John Mark Astorga Granby Colleges of Science and Technology, Cavite, Philippines, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/ijrael.v5i2.8962

Keywords:

Jesus Christ, objective truth, postmodern relativism, Christology, Philosophy, theological framework, Christian Apologetics

Abstract

The emergence of postmodern relativism has significantly challenged the Christian understanding of objective truth by rejecting universal truth claims and emphasizing subjective interpretation, cultural diversity, and epistemological pluralism. This paper examined Jesus Christ as the embodiment of objective truth and proposed a theological response to postmodern relativism grounded in the canonical Gospels. Employing a qualitative theological research design, the study utilized biblical exegesis, philosophical-theological analysis, and constructive theological synthesis to investigate Jesus' teachings concerning truth, morality, and divine revelation. The findings revealed that Jesus consistently presents truth as objective, absolute, and rooted in the character of God rather than in human interpretation or cultural consensus. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that the epistemological assumptions of postmodern relativism fundamentally conflict with Jesus' teachings regarding truth, morality, and reality. As a constructive theological contribution, the research developed the CHRISTOS Framework (Calling, Hermeneutics, Revelation, Incarnation, Sanctification, Truth Embodiment, Outreach, and Servanthood), a Christ-centered model for objective truth formation, discipleship, and mission in a postmodern context. The study concludes that Jesus Christ is not merely a teacher of truth but the incarnate embodiment of divine truth, providing the Church with a coherent theological foundation for defending biblical authority, cultivating faithful discipleship, and engaging contemporary culture with conviction, humility, and redemptive mission.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press.

Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. University of Chicago Press.

Doomen, J. (2025). The religious nature of ethics. Theoria, 91(4), e70004. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.70004

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.

Greco, T. (2024). The impact of postmodern thought on theological interpretations: Reconstructing religious narratives in a fragmented world. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2024.4708

Greene, B. C. (2025). From skepticism to story: Reclaiming the Bible's metanarrative for postmodern audiences. Religions, 16(8), Article 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16080996

Greene, B. C. (2025). The saga of Scripture: How should the Bible's "grand narrative" impact preaching in a postmodern world? Theology Today, 81(4), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736241276728

Johnson, D. (2025). Belief beyond reason: A radical relativist hinge epistemology. Philosophical Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-025-00244-4

Kakisina, M. (2025). Tantangan teologi postmodern terhadap Sola Scriptura. Jurnal Iluminasi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.71401/jil.v4i1.83

Klamut, R., & Sołtys, A. (2025). Investigating popular representations of postmodernism as beliefs: A psychological analysis and empirical verification. Religions, 16(10), Article 1288. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16101288

Koanak, I. A. K., & Sanda, H. Y. (2025). Maintaining the authority of the Bible in the postmodern era: A critique of relativism and a proposal of contextual hermeneutics. BONAFIDE: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.46558/bonafide.v6i1.366

Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. University of Minnesota Press.

McCaughey, M. (2025). Christianity, culture, and the real: From Maritain's integral humanism to a new integralism? Religions, 16(4), Article 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16040506

McCracken, K. (2025). On wisdom Christology and the wise use of Scripture. International Journal of Systematic Theology, 27(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijst.12753

Neacșu, N. (2025). Deconstructing theology or prophetic theology? A comparative Protestant and Eastern Orthodox Christian perspective. Religions, 16(1), Article 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16010081

Nordin, N. B. C., & Khairul, M. (2024). Examining the impact of relativism on religious beliefs in postmodern thought: An Islamic perspective. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 26, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.26.2024.305

Pratt Morris-Chapman, D. J. (2025). Nicaea today? The logic of contextual theology. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 81(1), Article a10896. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v81i1.10896

Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge University Press.

Simanjuntak, F., Belay, Y., & Prihanto, J. (2022). Tantangan postmodernisme bagi wacana teologi Kristen kontemporer. KENOSIS: Jurnal Kajian Teologi, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.37196/kenosis.v8i1.348

Soloviy, R. (2016). The challenge of postmodernism to Christian theology: Methodological and radical strategies of engagement. Theological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology, 17, 222–233. https://doi.org/10.29357/issn.2521-179X.2016.17.222

Verhoef, A. H. (2012). Postmodernism and the need for story and promise: How Robert Jenson's theology addresses some postmodern challenges to faith. Acta Theologica, 32(1), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.38140/at.v32i1.2433

Wahl, M. A. (2024). Relativizing relativism? Variations on a theme in Pope Benedict XVI and Pope Francis. The Heythrop Journal, 65(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.14307

Wallis, I. (2021). Difficult text: John 14.6 – Is Jesus the only way? Theology, 124(5), 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040571X211043174

Downloads

Published

2026-08-23

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): August 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2026 John Mark Astorga

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to IJRAEL: International Journal of Religion Education and Law Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to IJRAEL: International Journal of Religion Education and Law a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.