Analisis Perbedaan Tingkat Ansietas Personel Rumkital Dr. Midiyanto Suratani pada Kondisi Terpapar Ancaman Cognitive Warfare dan Kondisi Normal Guna Mendukung Tugas Pokok TNI Angkatan Laut

Authors

  • Z Chandra S Harahap Sekolah Staf dan Komando TNI Angkatan Laut, Indonesia
  • Hanjar K Sekolah Staf dan Komando TNI Angkatan Laut, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Irfan Ilmi Sekolah Staf dan Komando TNI Angkatan Laut, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/jetish.v6i1.9370

Keywords:

Cognitive Warfare, Ansietas, Personel Militer, Ketahanan Kognitif, Kesiapan Militer

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh meningkatnya penggunaan informasi, media digital, dan teknologi komunikasi dalam lingkungan militer yang menghadirkan bentuk ancaman baru berupa cognitive warfare. Ancaman tersebut tidak hanya diarahkan terhadap sistem informasi, tetapi juga terhadap proses kognitif personel melalui manipulasi informasi, disinformasi, pembentukan persepsi, tekanan psikologis, dan pengaruh terhadap pengambilan keputusan. Kondisi tersebut menjadi persoalan penting karena kesiapan personel militer tidak hanya ditentukan oleh kemampuan fisik dan operasional, tetapi juga oleh kemampuan mempertahankan ketahanan kognitif dan kondisi psikologis ketika menghadapi paparan ancaman informasi. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis pengaruh paparan cognitive warfare terhadap tingkat ansietas personel militer serta mengidentifikasi perbedaan respons psikologis antara personel yang memperoleh paparan ancaman dan kondisi normal. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain komparatif/eksperimental untuk memperoleh pengukuran objektif terhadap perubahan tingkat ansietas sebelum dan sesudah paparan serta membandingkan kelompok berdasarkan kondisi paparan. Pemilihan metode ini didasarkan pada kebutuhan penelitian untuk menguji hubungan dan perbedaan secara empiris sehingga dampak paparan cognitive warfare dapat diukur secara sistematis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa paparan ancaman kognitif dan informasi berpotensi memengaruhi respons psikologis personel, khususnya tingkat ansietas, dengan karakteristik respons yang berkaitan dengan kondisi stres, ketahanan kognitif, dan faktor protektif individu. Temuan tersebut memperkuat pentingnya memasukkan dimensi psikologis dan kognitif ke dalam konsep kesiapan personel militer menghadapi cognitive warfare. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa kesiapan menghadapi cognitive warfare perlu dikembangkan secara multidimensional melalui peningkatan cognitive resilience, literasi informasi, kemampuan mengenali manipulasi informasi, serta sistem pemantauan kondisi psikologis personel. Penelitian lanjutan direkomendasikan untuk menggunakan sampel yang lebih luas, desain longitudinal, serta menguji variabel lain seperti resilience, dukungan sosial, pengalaman operasi, dan kemampuan literasi digital sebagai faktor moderator atau mediator.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bennett, N., Lawrence-Wood, E., & McFarlane, A. (2024). Identifying psychological risk and resilience in high-risk military personnel. BMJ Military Health, 170(5), 390–395. https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2024-002724

Cantelon, J. A., Navarro, E., Brunyé, T. T., Eddy, M. D., Ward, N., Pantoja-Feliciano, I., Whitman, J., Saikia, M. J., & Giles, G. E. (2024). Emotional, physiological, biochemical, and behavioral responses to acute stress and uncertainty in military personnel. PLOS ONE, 19(11), e0312443. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312443

Crane, M. F., Hazel, G., Kunzelmann, A., Kho, M., Gucciardi, D. F., Rigotti, T., Kalisch, R., & Karin, E. (2024). An exploratory domain analysis of deployment risks and protective features and their association to mental health, cognitive functioning and job performance in military personnel. Journal of Affective Disorders, 37(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2228707

Deppe, C., & Schaal, S. (2024). Cognitive warfare: A conceptual analysis of the NATO ACT cognitive warfare exploratory concept. Frontiers in Big Data, 7, 1452129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2024.1452129

Flood, A., & Keegan, R. J. (2022). Cognitive resilience to psychological stress in military personnel. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 809003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809003

Gong, Y., et al. (2023). Network analysis of acute stress reaction in a sample of Chinese male military college students.

Grover, L. E., Williamson, C., Burdett, H., Palmer, L., & Fear, N. T. (2024). Level of perceived social support, and associated factors, in combat-exposed (ex-)military personnel: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 59, 2119–2143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-024-02685-3

Jing, K., Feng, Z., Xu, J., He, Y., Tang, Q., Zhang, Q., Wang, N., Xiao, Y., Gao, B., Xue, B., Wu, L., & Zhao, M. (2024). The mental health of Chinese military personnel: A cross-sectional epidemiological study. BMC Public Health, 24, 3525. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20969-w

Keegan, R. J., Flood, A., Niyonsenga, T., Welvaert, M., Rattray, B., Sarkar, M., Melberzs, L., & Crone, D. (2021). Development and initial validation of an acute readiness monitoring scale in military personnel. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 738609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738609

Li, et al. (2022). Stress exposure status and associated factors among Chinese People's Armed Police personnel: A cross-sectional study.

Liu, et al. (2024). Relationships between resilience, perceived social support, and mental health in military personnel: A cross-lagged analysis.

Mecha, P., Rodriguez-Morales, M., & Sanchez-Lopez, A. (2024). Components of hot and cold executive functions and their relations to different forms of stress resilience: A systematic review. Stress and Health, 40(5), e3439. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3439

NATO. (2021, May 20). Countering cognitive warfare: Awareness and resilience. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2021/05/20/countering-cognitive-warfare-awareness-and-resilience/index.html

NATO Allied Command Transformation. (2023, May 9). Cognitive warfare: Beyond military information support operations. https://www.act.nato.int/article/cognitive-warfare-beyond-military-information-support-operations/

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Phillips, V., & Barker, E. (2021). Systematic reviews: Structure, form and content. Journal of Perioperative Practice, 31(9), 349–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750458921994693

Price, M. M., Zanesco, A. P., Denkova, E., et al. (2024). Examining factors associated with self-reported cognitive functioning in elite military settings: Considerations of combat experiences and post-traumatic stress symptomology. Scientific Reports, 14, 19161. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-65826-3

Sun, Z., Song, J., Chen, J., Gan, X., Li, Y., Qiu, C., Zhang, W., & Gao, Y. (2024). Preventing and mitigating post-traumatic stress: A scoping review of resilience interventions for military personnel in pre-deployment. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 17, 2377–2389. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S459220

Traberg, et al. (2022). Psychological inoculation against misinformation: Current evidence and future directions.

Turliuc, M. N., & Balcan, A.-D. (2024). Psychological intervention programme for developing resilience in the military personnel: A randomized controlled trial. Stress and Health, 40(4), e3399. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3399

Willmund, G.-D., et al. (2023). The impact of the pandemic on the perception of stress and danger, and the adjustment of psychiatric and general medical staff of German military hospitals.

World Health Organization. (2025, September 8). Anxiety disorders. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/anxiety-disorders

Zhao, et al. (2023). Risk factors and prediction model for mental health in Chinese soldiers.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check