Dari Eropa Ke Indonesia: “Pembelajaran AI Untuk Mahasiswa”

Authors

  • Sari Handayani Berutu Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Sinta Sianipar Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Sri Rahmadani Universitas Negeri Medan
  • M Joharis Universitas Negeri Medan

Keywords:

Pembelajaran AI, Mahasiswa, Eropa, Indonesia

Abstract

Kemajuan kecerdasan buatan (AI) di Eropa telah membawa berbagai inovasi dalam dunia pendidikan tinggi, termasuk metode pembelajaran yang lebih adaptif, personalisasi materi, serta penggunaan teknologi AI dalam analisis data akademik. Artikel ini membahas bagaimana pendekatan pembelajaran AI dari Eropa dapat diadaptasi dan diterapkan dalam konteks pendidikan tinggi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi berbagai metode yang digunakan di universitas-universitas Eropa, seperti pembelajaran berbasis machine learning, chatbot pendidikan, serta sistem rekomendasi berbasis AI, dan menilai kesesuaiannya dengan kebutuhan mahasiswa Indonesia. Melalui studi kasus dan analisis komparatif, penelitian ini mengidentifikasi tantangan dalam implementasi, termasuk infrastruktur teknologi, kesiapan dosen dan mahasiswa, serta kebijakan pendidikan yang mendukung integrasi AI dalam kurikulum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat perbedaan dalam kesiapan teknologi dan regulasi, prinsip-prinsip pembelajaran berbasis AI dari Eropa dapat diterapkan secara efektif di Indonesia dengan penyesuaian yang tepat. Rekomendasi utama mencakup pelatihan dosen dalam pemanfaatan AI, pengembangan sistem AI yang disesuaikan dengan budaya belajar mahasiswa Indonesia, serta kolaborasi antara institusi pendidikan dan industri teknologi.Studi ini memberikan wawasan bagi pendidik, pengambil kebijakan, dan pengembang teknologi dalam mengoptimalkan peran AI untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran mahasiswa di Indonesia.

References

Anderson, C. A. (2020). Technology and learning: The impact of new technologies on education. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2025). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Davis, F. D. (2020). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 16(3), 319–340.

Gupta, H., & Arora, A. (2021). An empirical examination of the technology acceptance model for AI-based learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 213-224.

Huang, R. H., & Hew, K. F. (2020). Implementing AI in education: Insights from global practices. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 201-223.

Kurniawan, H., WU. A. S., & Tambunan, R. W. (2024). Potensi Al dalam Meningkatkan Kreativitas dan Literasi dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. JAMI: Jurnal Ahli Muda Indonesin, 5(1), 8-15

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher education. Routledge.

Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2020). Technology readiness index 2.0: A multiple-item scale for measuring readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 23(3), 312-327.

Patton, M. Q. (2025). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213498851

Siemens, G. (2020). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(10), 1330-1351.

Vygotsky, L. S. (2020). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Zaenudin, I., & Riyan, A. B. (2024). Perkembangan Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) Dan Dampaknya Pada Dunia Teknologi. Jurnal Informatika Utama, 2(2), 128-153.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): April 2025

Section

Articles

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to JLEB: Journal of Law Education and Business Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to JLEB: Journal of Law Education and Business a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.