Perlindungan Hak Pekerja Freelance di Era Gig Economy Studi Kasus: Platform Digital Lokal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57235/jleb.v4i1.8390Keywords:
Gig Economy, Freelance, Platform DigitalAbstract
Perkembangan ekonomi gig di Indonesia telah menciptakan lapisan pekerjaan baru yang berada di luar jangkauan perlindungan hukum konvensional. Studi ini meneliti model regulasi ideal untuk pekerja lepas di era ekonomi gig dan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang efektif antara pekerja lepas dan platform digital lokal. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif, hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa kerangka hukum ketenagakerjaan Indonesia tidak mampu mengakomodasi karakteristik unik pekerja platform, seperti subordinasi algoritmik dan ketergantungan ekonomi asimetris. Studi perbandingan dengan Inggris, Spanyol, Amerika Serikat, dan Prancis menekankan perlunya pembentukan kategori hukum baru "pekerja platform" dengan asumsi hubungan kerja, jaminan sosial proporsional, dan transparansi algoritmik. Dalam hal penyelesaian sengketa, pekerja lepas menghadapi berbagai hambatan mulai dari mekanisme internal platform yang tidak imparsial hingga ambiguitas yurisdiksi antara Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial (PHI) dan Pengadilan Negeri. Studi ini menyimpulkan perlunya sistem perlindungan hukum yang responsif, preventif, dan adaptif terhadap dinamika ekonomi digital.
Downloads
References
Ales, Edoardo, et al. (eds.). Working in Digital and Smart Organizations: Legal, Economic and Organizational Perspectives on the Digitalization of Labour Relations. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
Alvara Research Center. Indonesia Millennial and Gen-Z Report 2022. Jakarta: Alvara Research Center, 2022.
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia (APJII). Laporan Survei Internet Indonesia 2022–2023. Jakarta: APJII, 2023.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Agustus 2023. Jakarta: BPS RI, 2023.
Cherry, Miriam A., & Antonio Aloisi. “‘Dependent Contractors’ in the Gig Economy: A Comparative Approach.” American University Law Review, Vol. 66, No. 3, 2017.
Cour de cassation. Chambre sociale, arrêt du 4 mars 2020, n° 19-13.316.
De Stefano, Valerio. “Negotiating the Algorithm: Automation, Artificial Intelligence and Labour Protection.” Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2019.
European Commission. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work. COM(2021) 762 final. Brussels, 9 December 2021.
Harris, Seth & Alan Krueger. “A Proposal for Modernizing Labor Laws for Twenty-First-Century Work: The ‘Independent Worker’.” The Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution, 2015.
Husni, Lalu. Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2020.
International Labour Organization (ILO). Towards a Brighter Future for Platform Work: Principles and Practical Guidance for Improving the Working Conditions of Platform Workers. Geneva: ILO, 2023.
International Labour Organization (ILO). World Employment and Social Outlook 2021: The Role of Digital Labour Platforms in Transforming the World of Work. Geneva: ILO, 2021.
International Labour Organization (ILO). World Employment and Social Outlook 2021. Geneva: ILO, 2021.
Janah, Leila. Give Work: Reversing Poverty One Job at a Time. New York: Portfolio/Penguin, 2017.
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. Peta Jalan Ekonomi Digital Indonesia 2021–2025. Jakarta: Kominfo, 2021.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek). Diterjemahkan oleh R. Subekti dan R. Tjitrosudibio. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2009.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata), Pasal 1243 dan Pasal 1365.
Kumar, Ujjwal. “Employment Status of Gig Workers: A Comparative Legal Analysis.” International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 63, No. 4, 2021.
Lehdonvirta, Vili. Cloud Empires: How Digital Platforms Are Overtaking the State and How We Can Regain Control. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2022.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 37 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019.
Mamuaya, Rama. “The Gojek Story: How a Motorcycle Taxi Company Became Indonesia’s First Decacorn.” DailySocial.id, 4 Agustus 2019.
Manyika, James, et al. Independent Work: Choice, Necessity, and the Gig Economy. McKinsey Global Institute, 2016.
Mercer Indonesia. Indonesia Talent Trends 2023: Reinventing the Deal. Jakarta: Mercer, 2023.
Mulcahy, Diane. The Gig Economy. New York: AMACOM, 2016.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 tentang PKWT, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja dan Istirahat, dan PHK.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Prassl, Jeremias & Martin Risak. “Uber, Taskrabbit, and Co: Platforms as Employers? Rethinking the Legal Analysis of Crowdwork.” Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 37, 2016.
Real Decreto-ley 9/2021, de 11 de mayo, España.
Sribulancer. Laporan Tren Freelance Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: Sribulancer, 2022.
Srnicek, Nick. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017.
Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2021] UKSC 5. Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, 19 February 2021.
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements — May 2017. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor, 2018Ales, Edoardo, et al. (eds.). Working in Digital and Smart Organizations: Legal, Economic and Organizational Perspectives on the Digitalization of Labour Relations. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nathania Apriza, Gunardi Lie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
- Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to JLEB: Journal of Law Education and Business Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
- Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to JLEB: Journal of Law Education and Business a Publisher of the manuscript.
- Authors reserve the following:
- all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights;
- the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
- use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
- voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.
