Strategi Operasi Militer Terhadap Gerakan Aceh Merdeka di Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (Periode 1989-1998 dan 2003-2004)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57235/jleb.v4i2.8879Keywords:
Strategi Operasi Militer, Gerakan Aceh Merdeka, Daerah Operasi Militer, Operasi Terpadu, Ends–Ways–Means, Keamanan NasionalAbstract
Strategi operasi militer Pemerintah Indonesia dalam menghadapi Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (GAM) pada periode Daerah Operasi Militer (DOM) tahun 1989–1998 dan Operasi Terpadu tahun 2003–2004 didasarkan pada analisis strategi Arthur F. Lykke Jr., yakni tujuan strategis (ends), cara pelaksanaan (ways), dan sumber daya (means) yang digunakan pemerintah, serta mengevaluasi efektivitas strategi terhadap kondisi keamanan, sosial, politik, keutuhan NKRI, dan hubungan antara pemerintah pusat dengan Pemerintah Aceh. Metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus dan desain deskriptif-komparatif digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada periode DOM, tujuan strategis pemerintah berorientasi pada mempertahankan keutuhan NKRI dan menghancurkan kapasitas militer GAM melalui pendekatan keamanan (operasi kontra-insurgensi dengan pengerahan sumber daya militer secara besar-besaran). Sebaliknya, pada periode Operasi Terpadu, pemerintah mulai menerapkan strategi yang lebih komprehensif dengan mengintegrasikan operasi militer, penegakan hukum, pemulihan pemerintahan, serta pendekatan kemanusiaan, bertujuan stabilitas keamanan yang lebih baik dan membuka ruang bagi penyelesaian konflik melalui jalur politik yang berpuncak pada Perjanjian Helsinki tahun 2005. Kesimpulannya, efektivitas strategi operasi militer sangat dipengaruhi oleh keseimbangan antara tujuan, cara, dan sumber daya sebagaimana dijelaskan dalam konsep Ends–Ways–Means. Strategi yang terlalu menitikberatkan pada penggunaan kekuatan militer terbukti hanya mampu menghasilkan stabilitas jangka pendek, sedangkan strategi yang mengintegrasikan dimensi keamanan, politik, hukum, sosial, dan pembangunan memiliki peluang lebih besar dalam menciptakan perdamaian yang berkelanjutan serta memperkuat integrasi nasional.
Downloads
References
Adha, M. I. (2023). Analisis Dampak Konflik Bersenjata GAM Dengan Pemerintah Indonesia Terhadap Masyarkat Sipil Dalam Perspektif HAM. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 1(4), 17–21. https://gudangjurnal.com/index.php/gjmi
Aspinall, E. (2009). Islam and Nation: Separatism and Warfare in Aceh, Indonesia. Stanford University Press.
Aspinall, E., Carlson, A., & Collier, C. (2004). Policy Studies 1 The Aceh Peace Process: Why it Failed “Beijing’s Tibet Policy: Securing Sovereignty and Legitimacy” “Southern Philippines and the International War Against Terror.” East-West Center Washington.
Azca, M. N. (2006). Security Sector Reform, Human Rights and Peace-Building in Indonesia: The Case of Aceh. MAs dissertation, University of Bradford.
Barter, S. J. (2014). Civilian Strategy in Civil War: Insights from Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines. Palgrave Macmillan.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Clausewitz, C. von. (1976). On War trans. Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton University Press. http://books.google.com/books
Creswell, J. W. (2011). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Manual Therapy, 16(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.09.003
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran (Edisi Keempat). Pustaka Pelajar.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran (Edisi Keempat). Pustaka Pelajar.
Crouch, H. (1978). The Army and Politics in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167-191.
Galtung, J. (2011). Peace, Positive and Negative. The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470672532.WBEPP189
Grey. (2012). Modern Strategy. In Scientia Militaria - South African Journal of Military Studies (Vol. 30, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.5787/30-1-169
Heger, M. P., & Neumayer, E. (2022a). Economic legacy effects of armed conflict: Insights from the civil war in Aceh, Indonesia. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 39(4), 394–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894221994503/SUPPL_FILE/SJ-DTA-1-QHR-10.1177_0738894221994503.DTA
Heger, M. P., & Neumayer, E. (2022b). Economic legacy effects of armed conflict: Insights from the civil war in Aceh, Indonesia. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 39(4), 394–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894221994503/SUPPL_FILE/SJ-DTA-1-QHR-10.1177_0738894221994503.DTA
Human Rights Watch. (2001). Indonesia: The War in Aceh (Vol. 13, No. 4). Human Rights Watch.
Human Rights Watch. (2001). Indonesia: The War in Aceh. Vol. 13, No. 4.
International Crisis Group (ICG). (2001). Aceh: Why Military Force Won't Bring Lasting Peace (Asia Report No. 17). International Crisis Group.
Kingsbury, D. (2006). Peace in Aceh: A Personal Account of the Helsinki Peace Process. Equinox Publishing.
Lykke Jr, A. F. (1997). Defining Military strategy. Military Review, 37(8), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2916346
Lykke, A. F. (2001). Defining Military Strategy. U.S. Army War College Guide to Strategy.
Maisarah, C., & Hasan, E. (2019). Transformasi Perjuangan Politik Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (Suatu Penelitian Terhadap Arah dan Strategi Perjuangan Politik GAM Pasca 13 Tahun Perjanjian MoU Helsinki). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial & Ilmu Politik, 4(2). https://jim.usk.ac.id/FISIP/article/view/10476
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). QUALITATIVE RESEARCH A Guide to Design and Implementation.
Morfit, M. (2007). The Road to Helsinki: The Aceh Peace Agreement and Indonesia's Democratic Development. International Negotiation, 12(3), 111-143.
Najwa Aulia, S. (2024). Sejarah dan Perkembangan Konflik Gerakan Separatisme Aceh. Jurnal Demokrasi Dan Ketahanan Nasional |, 3(2), 2024.
Nugroho, K. A., Deksino, G. R., Nugroho, A. D., & Kamarani, S. (2023a). Analisis Sejarah dan Kontemporer Gerakan Separatisme di Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(1), 95–100. http://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/pkn/article/view/4699
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs.
PP No. 70, 1996. (1996). Presiden Republik Indonesia Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia. Demographic Research, 4–7.
Pratiwi, E. A. (2019). CAMPUR TANGAN ASING di INDONESIA : CRISIS MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE DALAM PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK ACEH (2005-2012). Historia: Jurnal Pendidik Dan Peneliti Sejarah, 2(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.17509/historia.v2i2.15630
Prayogo, A. R. (2025). Mengukur Nafas Panjang Perdamaian : Analisis Normatif MoU Helsinki dalam Menjamin Hak Asasi dan Rekonsiliasi di Aceh. LEX RENAISSANCE, 10(June), 125–145.
Putra, N. H., & Amran, A. (2023). Dinamika Tata Kelola Dana Otonomi Khusus Di Aceh. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 29(2), 192–213. https://doi.org/10.33509/jan.v29i2.1819
Reid, A. (2006). Verandah of Violence: The Background to the Aceh Problem. Singapore University Press.
Robinson, G. (1998). Rawan is as Rawan Does: The Origins of Disorder in New Order Aceh. Indonesia, (66), 127-156.
Schulze, K. E. (2003a). Studies in Conflict & Terrorism The Struggle for an Independent Aceh: The Ideology, Capacity, and Strategy of GAM. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 26(4), 241–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100390209304
Schulze, K. E. (2003b). The Struggle for an Independent Aceh: The Ideology, Capacity, and Strategy of GAM. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 26(4), 241–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100390209304
Schulze, K. E., Aspinall, E., Carlson, A., & Collier, C. (2004). The Free Aceh Movement (GAM): Anatomy of a Separatist Organization Previous and Forthcoming Issues.
Situmorang, M. (2010). Transformasi Gerakan Aceh Merdeka. In Transformasi Gerakan Aceh Merdeka: Dari Kotak Peluru ke Kotak Suara Sebuah Kisah Sukses Program Transformasi Kombatan di Aceh.
Stange, G., & Patock, R. (2010). From Rebels to Rulers and Legislators: The Political Transformation of the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29(1), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341002900105
Sugiono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta. https://inlislite.ipdn.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=5191
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukma, R. (2004). Security Operations in Aceh: Goals, Consequences, and Lessons. Policy Studies 3, Washington: East-West Center.
TAP MPR Nomor XVII/MPR/1998 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
UU No. 39 Tahun 1999, UU No. 26 Tahun 2000, dan UUD 1945 Dasar hukum nasional mengenai HAM.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh.
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000 tentang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia.
United Nations Development Programme. (1994). Human Development Report 1994: New Dimensions of Human Security. Oxford University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2024). A Book Review: Case Study Research and Applications. 2(1), 306–312.
Zakirman, Widiasih, W., Sukmayadi, D., Aprianti, R., & Nadiyyah, K. (2023). New Pattern to Improving Student Physics Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7439–7444. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3324
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Peka Aswan, Budi Santoso, Heri Abriyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
- Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to JLEB: Journal of Law Education and Business Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
- Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to JLEB: Journal of Law Education and Business a Publisher of the manuscript.
- Authors reserve the following:
- all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights;
- the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
- use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
- voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.
