Penerimaan Akta Pengakuan Utang Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Kasus Wanprestasi: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 402/Pdt.G/2023/Pn Sby
Keywords:
Akta Pengakuan Utang, Wanprestasi, Alat BuktiAbstract
Dalam praktik perdata, akta pengakuan utang sering dijadikan alat bukti utama dalam perkara wanprestasi. Namun, penerimaannya tidak serta-merta dianggap mutlak oleh pengadilan, melainkan tetap harus memenuhi syarat formil dan materil. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh penerimaan akta pengakuan utang sebagai alat bukti terhadap pertanggungjawaban debitur atas wanprestasi menurut KUHPerdata, serta untuk mengkaji pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 402/Pdt.G/2023/PN Sby. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan dan dokumen putusan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akta pengakuan utang yang dibuat secara autentik memiliki kekuatan pembuktian sempurna, sepanjang memenuhi unsur kesepakatan, kepastian objek, serta tidak bertentangan dengan hukum. Akta tersebut dapat dijadikan dasar hukum oleh hakim dalam menilai adanya wanprestasi dan menetapkan pertanggungjawaban debitur.
References
Busro. 2013. Dalam Kurnaliah, K. & Aminah, A. Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Hukum Akta Pengakuan Hutang (Studi Putusan MA No. 04/PDT. G/2017/PN. Btg). Notarius, Vol. 17, No. 3.
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. Translated by Anders Wedberg. New York: Russell & Russell, 1961.
Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory of Law. Translation from the Second (Revised and Enlarged) German Edition. Translated by Max Knight. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1967.
Kurnaliah, K. & Aminah, A. Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Hukum Akta Pengakuan Hutang. Notarius, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2020.
Pond, Roscoe. Pengantar Filsafat Hukum. Diterjemahkan oleh Drs. Muhamad Radjab. Jakarta: Bhratara Karya Aksara, 1982
Subekti. Hukum Perikatan. Jakarta: Intermasa, 2009.
Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
Supramono, Gatot. Perjanjian Utang Piutang. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2013.
Sutikno, A. Praktik Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2020.
Widodo, B. Perkembangan Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
- Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
- Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law a Publisher of the manuscript.
- Authors reserve the following:
- all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights;
- the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
- use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
- voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.
