Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menjaga Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang di Indonesia studi Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 tentang Uji Formil UU Cipta Kerja
Keywords:
Mahkamah Konstitusi, Konstitusionalitas, Uji Formil, Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, Negara HukumAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam menjaga konstitusionalitas undang-undang melalui studi kasus Putusan Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 tentang uji formil Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Mahkamah Konstitusi tidak hanya berwenang melakukan uji materiil, tetapi juga berperan penting dalam menilai kesesuaian proses pembentukan undang-undang dengan ketentuan konstitusional. Melalui pendekatan kualitatif dan studi kepustakaan, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa Mahkamah dalam putusan tersebut menyatakan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja sebagai inkonstitusional bersyarat akibat tidak terpenuhinya prinsip partisipasi publik yang bermakna dan prosedur legislasi yang tepat. Putusan ini menjadi tonggak penting dalam pembentukan hukum di Indonesia dan mempertegas posisi Mahkamah sebagai penjaga konstitusi sekaligus pengawal demokrasi.
References
Bimantya, Deva Mahendra Caesar, and Muh Ali Masnun. “Dinamika Perjalanan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/Puu-Xviii/2020 Tentang Uji Formil Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja).” Novum: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2 (2025): 34–43.
Fitria, Desi Fitria, Mukhlis Mukhlis, and Harun Harun. “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/Puu-Xviii/2020 Atas Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh 6, no. 2 (2023): 108. https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v6i2.12558.
Mutawalli, Muhammad. “Kewenangan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Dalam Melakukan Pemeriksaan Dana Desa Yang Bersumber Dari Apbn.” Litigasi 23, no. 1 (2022): 61–82. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v23i1.5030.
Wicaksono, Dian Agung. “(Quo Vadis of the Constitutional Court’s Standing in Reviewing the Law of Job Creation and Its Implications towards Regional Government’s Confusion in Implementing Authority to Regulate).” RechtsVinding 11, no. April (2022): 77–98.
Wicaksono, Dian Agung, Malik Anwar, Wulan Chorry Shafira, Upaya Pengaturan, Kembali Delik, Penghinaan Presiden, Rkuhp Indonesia, et al. “Analisis Metode Penafsiran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perumusan Putusan Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Terkait Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja.” RechtsVinding 11, no. 1 (2022): 79–93. https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v6i2.12558.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
- Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
- Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law a Publisher of the manuscript.
- Authors reserve the following:
- all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights;
- the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
- use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
- voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.
