Juridical Analysis of Termination of Investigation of the Crime of Signature Forgery (Case Study at Barelang Police)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to understand the legal regulation of signature forgery by the investigators of Polresta Barelang Police, observe the implementation of signature forgery by these investigators, and ascertain the legal basis for the termination of investigations into signature forgery cases. The results shows that the legal basis for terminating investigations into signature forgery cases is regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure (UUPA) in Indonesia. While investigators have worked with professionalism and integrity, many cases come to a halt after the suspect is declared unfit to be held accountable. There is a gap in handling cases involving suspects who are unable to be held accountable, leading to discrepancies with legal regulations and principles of criminal law.It's essential for the authorities to establish a clear definition of individuals unable to be held accountable for their actions and precise provisions for handling such criminal offenders. Additionally, reasons for criminal removal should be included as criteria for the termination of investigations. The police force should create guidelines for conducting investigations that adhere to legal procedures and carry out their responsibilities dutifully.