Determinan Risiko Likuiditas pada Sektor Perbankan di Indonesia

Tisna Septiana(1), Robith Hudaya(2),


(1) Universitas Mataram
(2) Universitas Mataram
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Pengelolaan risiko likuiditas merupakan tugas yang sangat krusial terutama dalam sektor perbankan. Untuk menghindari risiko likuiditas perbankan dibutuhkan perencanaan yang seimbang antara likuiditas dan profitabilitas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis determinan risiko likuiditas perbankan di Indonesia. Variabel yang digunakan sebagai determinan risiko likuiditas yakni capital adequacy ratio, basel, return on assets, leverage, dan ukuran bank. Model yang digunakan yaitu common effect, fixed effect, dan random effect. Sampel yang digunakan pada penelitian ini yakni sebanyak 25 bank di Indonesia pada periode tahun 2019 hingga 2022. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa capital adequacy ratio dan leverage menunjukkan hasil negatif terhadap risiko likuiditas dan konsisten pada ketiga model. Untuk variabel basel dan ukuran bank masih menunjukkan hasil yang berbeda pada masing-masing model. Dari hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa capital adequacy ratio dan leverage memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap risiko likuiditas perbankan. Sedangkan, capital adequacy ratio, basel, return on assets, dan ukuran bank memiliki pengaruh yang tidak signifikan terhadap risiko likuiditas perbankan. Oleh karena itu, pembuat kebijakan dan pimpinan bank perlu mempertimbangkan karakteristik bank ketika mengelola risiko likuiditas, seperti capital adequacy ratio dan leverage.


Keywords


Risiko Likuiditas, Determinan

References


Abdullah, A., & Khan, A. Q. (2012). Liquidity Risk Management: A Comparative Study between Domestic and Foreign Banks in Pakistan. Journal of Managerial Sciences., 6(1), 61–72.

Abdul-Rahman, A., Sulaiman, A. A., & Mohd Said, N. L. H. (2018). Does financing structure affects bank liquidity risk? Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 52, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.04.004

Almumani, M. A. (2013). Liquidity Risk Management: A Comparative Study between Saudi and Jordanian Banks.

Ambarawati, A. A. A. D., Wiksuana, I. G. B., & Artini, L. G. S. (2017). Variabel Keuangan Yang Membedakan Tingkat Likuiditas Bank Umum Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 6(12), 4137–4166.

Azhary, A., & Muharam, H. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Risiko Likuiditas Pada Bank Konvensional (Studi pada Bank yang Termasuk Badan Usaha Milik Pemerintah dan Bank Asing di Indonesia dan Malaysia Periode Tahun 2011 sampai dengan 2015). Diponegoro Journal Of Management, 6, 1–12. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/dbr

Bani, F., & Yaya, R. (2016). Risiko Likuiditas pada Perbankan Konvensional dan Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Bisnis, 16(1), 1–26.

Bhat, M. Y., & Sahoo, P. (2015). Bank capital and liquidity risk: Evidence from India. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 7(4), 390–405.

Budiyati, E., & Kusumawardhani, R. (2022). Analisis Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Likuiditas Bank Di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Bisnis, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.55587/jseb.v2i2.57

Chen, Y.-K., Shen, C.-H., Kao, L., & Yeh, C.-Y. (2017). Bank Liquidity Risk and Performance. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 21(01), 1850007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219091518500078

Chiorazzo, V., D’Apice, V., DeYoung, R., & Morelli, P. (2018). Is the traditional banking model a survivor? Journal of Banking and Finance, 97, 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.008

Desiko, N. (2020). Pengaruh Risiko Kredit, Risiko Pasar Dan Risiko Likuiditas Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan (Studi pada Bank Umum Konvensional yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2014-2018). Journal Competency of Business, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.47200/jcob.v4i1.676

Dinda Maharani Jaiz, Rahmawati, & Asriany. (2020). Pengaruh Capital Adequacy Ratio, Solvabilitas, Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Risiko Likuiditas Pada Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Wahana Akuntansi, 15(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.21009/wahana.15.021

Effendi, K. A., & Disman, D. (2017). Liquidity Risk: Comparison between Islamic and Conventional Banking. In European Research Studies Journal: Vol. XX.

Elnahass, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Li, T. (2021). Global banking stability in the shadow of Covid-19 outbreak. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101322

Galletta, S., & Mazzù, S. (2019). Liquidity risk drivers and bank business models. Risks, 7(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks7030089

Gautama, B. P., Annisa, R., & Waspada, I. (2018). Pengaruh Kecukupan Modal dan Risiko Kredit Terhadap Likuiditas Pada Bank Umum Syariah Yang Terdaftar di Bank Indonesia. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN AKUNTANSI & KEUANGAN, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/jpak.v6i2.15908

Hamdi, B., & Herianingrum, S. (2022). Determinan Risiko Likuiditas Bank Syariah dan Konvensional Sebelum dan Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori Dan Terapan, 9(4), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol9iss20224pp573-585

Jain, M., & Singla, R. (2022). Role of leverage and liquidity risk in asset pricing: evidence from Indian stock market. Vilakshan - XIMB Journal of Management, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/xjm-08-2020-0088

Kawuri, W. R. (2015). Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Fundamental Terhadap Risiko Likuiditas Pada Sektor Perbankan (Studi Pada Bank Konvensional dan Bank Syariah di Indonesia).

Lartey, V. C., Antwi, S., & Boadi, E. K. (2013). The Relationship between Liquidity and Profitability of Listed Banks in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(3).

Ma, Y., & Li, Z. (2020). Funding Liquidity and Bank Risk-Taking: Empirical Evidence from China. China Finance and Economic Review, 9(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2020-090105

Made Ayunda Sukma Putri, N., Made Surya Negara Sudirman, I., Kunci, K., Konvensional, B., Syariah, B., Keuangan, K., Komparatif, S., & Ekonomi dan Bisnis, F. (2023). E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana Studi Komparatif Kinerja Keuangan Bank Konvensional Dan Bank Syariah Di Indonesia Periode Tahun 2020-2021. 12(08), 1472–1483. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/EEB/

Marizha Dwi R, Sri Rahayu, & Ilham Wahyudi. (2020). Pengaruh Kecukupan Modal, Risiko Kredit, Profitabilitas, dan Ukuran Bank Terhadap Likuiditas (Studi Pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2013 - 2018). Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Unja, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.22437/jaku.v5i2.10260

Muharam, H., & Kurnia, H. P. (2012). The Influence Of Fundamental Factors To Liquidity Risk On Banking Industry: Comparative Study between Islamic Bank and Conventional Bank In Indonesia. Conference In Business, Accounting, And Management (CBAM), 1(2).

Naoaj, M. S. (2023a). Exploring the Determinants of Capital Adequacy in Commercial Banks: A Study of Bangladesh’s Banking Sector. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.2.1887

Naoaj, M. S. (2023b). Measuring Liquidity Risk and Its Determinants in Commercial Banks of Bangladesh: An Empirical Investigation. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(2), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.2.1889

Nurtiandriyani Simamora. (2023). Persaingan Kian Ketat, Ini Saran Pengamat Agar Bank Digital Tak Ditinggal Nasabah Selasa, 15 Agustus 2023 / 20:18 WIB Indeks Berita Persaingan Kian Ketat, Ini Saran Pengamat Agar Bank Digital Tak Ditinggal Nasabah ILUSTRASI. Ilustrasi keuangan digital. KO. 1.

Olivia, C., Dorkas, A., Atahau, R., & Martono, S. (2022). Financial Risk and Performance of National Private Foreign Exchange Commercial Bank: Moderating Effects of Bank Size. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 26(1), 2443–2687. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v26i1.6268

Probowati, L., & Nabhan, F. (2021a). Peran Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) dalam Mengendalikan Liquidity Risk dan Credit Risk, Sehingga Mampu Mendorong Peningkatan Profitability. In IHTIYATH Jurnal Manajemen Keuangan Syariah (Vol. 5, Issue 2).

Probowati, L., & Nabhan, F. (2021b). The Role Of Capital Adequacy Ratio (Car) In Controlling Liquidity Risk And Credit Risk, So About Profitability Improvements. Ihtiyath : Jurnal Manajemen Keuangan Syariah. https://doi.org/10.32505/ihtiyath.v5i2.3456

Putri, E., Naifa Ardiningrum, B., & Nursiam, N. (2023). The Influence of Liquidity, Leverage, Profitability and Business Risk on the Dividend Policy of Manufacturing Companies listed on the IDX. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 7(2), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v7i2.17251

Putri, S. A., & Pardistya, I. Y. (2021). Pengaruh Kecukupan Modal, Risiko Operasional Dan Kredit Bermasalah Terhadap Profitabilitas Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Bumn Periode 2010-2019. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 10(10), 873–882. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/EEB/

Rauch, J., Steffen, S., & Wang, J. (2015). Bank liquidity provision across the firm size distribution. Journal of Banking & Finance, 61(Suppl. 1), S1-S14.

Raz, A. F., McGowan, D., & Zhao, T. (2022). The dark side of liquidity regulation: Bank opacity and funding liquidity risk. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 52, 100990. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2022.100990

Religiosa, M. W., & Surjandari, D. A. (2021). The Relation of Company Risk, Liquidity, Leverage, Capital Adequacy and Earning Management: Evidence from Indonesia Banking Companies. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2021-0001

Rose, P., & Hudgins, S. (2010). Bank management and financial services. In Mc Graw-Hill/Irwin. America Newyork.

Shair, F., Sun, N., Shaorong, S., Atta, F., & Hussain, M. (2019). Impacts of risk and competition on the profitability of banks: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. PLoS ONE, 14(11), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224378

Sidhu, A. V., Rastogi, S., Gupte, R., & Bhimavarapu, V. M. (2022). Impact of Liquidity Coverage Ratio on Performance of Select Indian Banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15050226

Simatupang, H. B. (2019). Peranan perbankan dalam meningkatkan perekonomian indonesia. JRAM (Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Multiparadigma).

Sukmana, R., & Suryaningtyas, S. (2016). Determinants of Liquidity Risk in Indonesian Islamic and Conventional Banks: A Panel Regression. Al-Iqtishad: Journal of Islamic Economics, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v8i2.2871

Tammenga, A., & Haarman, P. (2020). Liquidity risk regulation and its practical implications for banks: the introduction and effects of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio. Maandblad Voor Accountancy En Bedrijfseconomie, 94(9/10). https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.94.51137

Wahab, W. (2015). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Efisiensi Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia Dengan Pendekatan Two Stage Stochastic Frontier Aproach (Studi Analisis di Bank Umum Syariah). Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21580/economica.2015.6.2.794

Widyarti, E. T., Widyakto, A., & Suhardjo, Y. (2022). Analysis of the Effect of Non-Performing Loan, Return on Assets, Return on Equity and Size on Banking Liquidity Risk. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 13(1), 78–86. http://jdm.unnes.ac.id

Winda Yulias Tuti, Maizul Rahmizal, & Khairil Aswan. (2022). the Effects of Return on Assets, Capital Adequacy Ratio, and Financing on Liquidity Risk in Sharia Bprs in Indonesia. AKUMULASI: Indonesian Journal of Applied Accounting and Finance, 1(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.20961/akumulasi.v1i1.314

Yerismal. (2018). Analisis pengaruh LDR, NPL dan CAR terhadap risiko likuiditas pada Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (BPR) di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Bisnis 6, 99(105).

Yumaita, R., Hady, H., & Naluria, F. (2022). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi risiko likuiditas pada bank yang terdaftar di BEI. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(2), 909–914. https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v5i2.1985


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 181 times
PDF Download : 100 times

DOI: 10.57235/jamparing.v2i1.2073

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Tisna Septiana, Robith Hudaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.