Analysis of the Application of the Code of Ethics and Criminal Sanctions Against Advocates Receiving Bribery
), Cicilia Natalie(2), Yessa Milianty(3), Lydia Anindira(4), Wanda Putri Sukawan(5),
(1) Universitas Tarumanagara
(2) Universitas Tarumanagara
(3) Universitas Tarumanagara
(4) Universitas Tarumanagara
(5) Universitas Tarumanagara
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Indonesia is a constitutional state that upholds justice. Advocates as one of the law enforcement officers who have an important role in maintaining justice and the integration of the legal justice system should not be ethical to accept bribes from any party, but it cannot be denied that there are still unscrupulous advocates who accept bribes and tarnish their professional code of ethics. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach related to the problem of bribery criminal sanctions against advocates. Advocates who accept bribes not only harm the fundamental principles that underlie the legal system but also damage the entire public's trust in the advocate profession and the justice system as a whole. Sanctions for unscrupulous advocates who accept bribes include revocation of their advocate license, disciplinary action, and criminal sanctions. Bribery in any form is unacceptable and must be eradicated immediately so that justice is protected in the justice system.
Keywords
References
Andrianto Nico dan Johansyah Prima Ludy. 2010. Korupsi Di Daerah Modus Operandi & Peta Jalan Pencegahannya, Putra Media Nusantara, Surabaya.
Butarbutar, Russel. (2017). Modus Operandi Dan Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Suap Korporasi. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 4.
Guslan, Odie Faiz. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Batasan Antara Perbuatan Maladministrasi Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, Vol.4.
Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Indonesia, Kode Etik Advokat.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 1980 Tindak Pidana Suap.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 18 Tahun 2003 Advokat.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2008. Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Pranada Media Group, Jakarta.
Muryanti. (2018). Tindakan Korupsi Sebagai Tindakan Imoral Dalam Perspektif Fungsional. Profetik Jurnal Komunikasi, Vol 1.
Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian. (2016). Integritas Advokat dan Kebebasannya Dalam Berprofesi: Ditinjau Dari Penegakan Kode Etik Advokat. Rechtidee, Vol 11.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. 2006. Ilmu Hukum.Cetakan Keenam,Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Rajagukguk, Erman. (2008). Advokat Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol 15.
Rasul, Sjahruddin. (2009). Penerapan Good Governance Di Indonesia Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Vol 21.
RB. Soemanto, Sudarto, Sudarsana. (2014). Pemahaman Masyarakat Tentang Korupsi. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, Vol 3.
Soemodiharjo, Dyatmiko. R. (2008). Mencegah Dan Memberantas Korupsi Mencermati Dinamikanya Di Indonesia. Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta.
Wahid, Abdul. (2009). Etika Profesi Hukum Rekonstruksi Citra Peradilan Di Indonesia. Bayumedia Publishing, Malang.
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 65 times
Download : 57 times
DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i2.841
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Khanza Octalivia Karyn, Cicilia Natalie, Yessa Milianty, Lydia Anindira, Wanda Putri Sukawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
