Juridical Analysis of the Use of Information/Electronic Documents as Evidence in Criminal Law Enforcement (Case Study Decision Number: 192/Pid.B/2023/PN Btm)

Authors

  • Hasanudin Hasanudin Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Soerya Respationo Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Erniyanti Erniyanti Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Bachtiar Simatupang Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Ramon Nofrial Universitas Batam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v3i1.1387

Keywords:

Electronic Information, Evidence, Criminal Case

Abstract

The background to writing this thesis is about: proof of criminal acts has been regulated in Article 183-Article 189 of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Code of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP). A new thing emerged after the issuance of the Information and Information Technology Law on electronic evidence, the debate about electronic evidence was seen in the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 20/PUU- XIV/2016, which stated that electronic evidence should be seen as complementary legal evidence to evidence that has been known in procedural law. The results showed that the legal regulation for the use of electronic information/documents as evidence in criminal law enforcement, namely Article 5 of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) which regulates that electronic information and/or electronic documents and/or printouts are valid evidence in the judicial process. The implementation of the use of electronic information/documents as evidence in criminal law enforcement in the case of Decision Number: 192/Pid.B/2023/PN-Btm can be used as evidence recognized in trials, but it is necessary to ensure the authentication of electronic evidence with strict mechanisms because electronic evidence has a high potential for manipulation or forgery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aditya, Bimo, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2017.

Alfitra, Hukum Pembuktian dalam beracara Pidana, Perdata, dan Korupsi di Indonesia. Raih Asa Sukses, Jakarta, 2011.

Ali, Achmad, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence), Kencana Prenada Group, Jakarta, 2012.

Ali, Zainuddin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2014. Alwi, Hasan, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 2010.

Amalia, Rina. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Informasi Elektronik, Erlangga, Jakarta, 2018.

Buku pedoman penyusunan proposal dan tesis program megister ilmu hukum pasca sarjana uniba.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 dan kembali ditegaskan di dalam perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Teknologi Informasi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): January 2024

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.