Juridical Analysis of Narcotics Abusers from a Restorative Justice Perspective (Research Study at the Directorate of Drug Investigation at the Riau Islands Regional Police)

Authors

  • Wendy Ricard Simamora Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Laily Washliati Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Sayid Fadhil Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Soerya Respationo Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Erniyanti Erniyanti Universitas Batam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v3i1.1413

Keywords:

Narcotics Abuser, Restorative Justice

Abstract

Sanctions against drug users in the form of punishment with imprisonment which causes the inability of prisons to accommodate drug users, so that law enforcement makes policies by applying the concept of restorative justice to drug abuse crimes without submitting to the Court as a policy. This study aims to determine the application of the concept of restorative justice carried out by police investigators to drug abuse crimes. This study uses a descriptive method with a normative approach (legal research) to obtain secondary data and an empirical approach (sociological juridical) to obtain primary data through field research at the Ditresobat Polda Kepri. The results showed that the legal regulation of the application of the concept of restorative justice to narcotics abusers carried out by the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia has been regulated in the National Police Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2021 concerning the Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice and SEMA Number 4 of 2010 concerning Placement. Abuse of Abuse Victims and Drug Addicts into Medical Rehabilitation and Social Rehabilitation Institutions. In the application of restorative justice, it is sufficient to be applied in the law enforcement process of drug abusers.The act of carrying out rehabilitation at the investigation level by solving cases of drug abusers is very good and worthy of being regulated in the Narcotics Law, For this reason, it is expected that the government and the DPR will make changes to Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achjani Zulfa Eva. 2013. Keadilan Restoraif. Badan Penerbit FH UI. Jakarta.

Achmad Rifai. 2014. Narkoba di Balik Tembok Penjara. Aswaja. Yogyakarta.

Anang Iskandar. 2019. Penegakan Hukum Narkotika-Rehabilitasi Terhadap Penyalahguna dan Pecandu. Represif Terhadap Pengedar. Elex Media Komputindo. Jakarta.

Anang Iskandar. 2019. Rehabilitatif terhadap pernyalahguna dan pecandu, represif terhadap pengedar. Gramedia. Jakarta.

Anang Iskandar. 2015. Jalan Lurus Penanganan Penyalahguna Narkotika dalam Konstruksi Hukum Positf. CV. Viva Tanfas. Karawang.

Agus Rusianto. 2016. Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Predanamedia. Jakarta.

AR Sujono dan Bony Daniel. 2016. Komentar dan Pembahasan Undang- Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Bakhri Syaiful. 2013. Kejahatan Narkotik dan Psikotropika-suatu pendekatan melalui kebijakan hukum pidana. Gramata Publishing. Bekasi.

Barda Nawawi Arif. 2017. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana- Perkembangan Pengusunan RKUHP Baru. Kencana. Jakarta.

Barda Nawawi Arief. 2013. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Prenada Media. Jakarta.

Barda Nawawi Arief. 2013. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana-Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Kencana. Jakarta.

Barda Nawawi Arief. Mediasi Penal Penyelesaian Perkara Diluar Pengadilan, Pustaka Magister, Semarang.

Beniharmoni, Harefa. 2016. Kapita Selekta Perlindungan Hukum bagi Anak, Deepublish, Jakarta.

Dharana, Lastarya. 2006. Narkoba, Perlukah Mengenalnya, Pakarkarya, Jakarta.

Dikdik M Arief Mansur dan Elisatris Gultom. 2016. Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan. Raja Grasindo Persada. Jakarta.

Eddy O.S Hiariej. 2014. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka. Yogyakarta.

Erdianto Efendi. 2013. Hukum Pidana Indonesia Suatu Pengantar cetakan pertama. Reflika Aditama. Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): January 2024

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.