Juridical Analysis of the Crime of Money Laundering from the Proceeds of Narcotics Crimes (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 386.K/Pid.sus/2022)

Authors

  • Nahar Muhammad Iqbal Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Soerya Respationo Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Erniyanti Erniyanti Universitas Batam, Indonesia
  • Fadlan Fadlan Universitas Batam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v3i1.1454

Keywords:

Crime, Money Laundering, Narcotics

Abstract

A new paradigm in solving the problem of eradicating money laundering crimes which are linked to narcotics crimes, where these narcotics crimes are the lifeblood of the mafia and at the same time the proceeds of narcotics crimes with the money laundering mode are a weak point for the mafia which is easy to detect. This research aims to find out how law enforcement is regulated for laundering money from narcotics crimes. How to implement the obstacles and solutions for law enforcement in the crime of laundering money from narcotics crimes. What is the analysis of law enforcement for the crime of money laundering resulting from narcotics crimes in the Supreme Court Decision Number 386.K/Pid.sus/2022. This research uses a normative juridical research method that is descriptive analysis, namely research carried out by examining library materials (secondary data) or library legal research. To obtain primary data, field research was carried out in the form of interviews. Obstacles faced in preventing TPPU crimes from the proceeds of narcotics crimes. Incompatibility of understanding between law enforcement officials regarding TPPU is the main obstacle. Without a common perception between investigators public officials and judges, the handling of money laundering cases will end in the perpetrator being released from the law. TPPU. Rapid advances in technology make it difficult to detect money laundering due to TPPU modes and techniques. The research results show that the criminal threat of money laundering is regulated in article 3, namely a maximum prison sentence of 20 (twenty) years and a maximum fine of IDR 10,000,000,000. The panel of judges at the District Court that hears money laundering criminal cases acts decisively in handing down criminals, especially because the investigation process usually receives scrutiny from the public, such as money laundering from narcotics crimes and corruption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adrian Sutedi, Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, Citra Bakti, Bandung, 2008

Andi Hamzah, 1985, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta:Ghana Indonesia

Andri Gunawan, 2013, Membatasi Transaksi Tunai Peluang dan Tantangan, Indonesian Legal Roundtable, Jakarta Selatan

Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2008

Sutedi, Adrian. Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Cetakan ke 1, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2008.

Sudarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Bandung Alumni, 1986; Sugiyono, Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Alafabeta, 2012.

Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Bandung : PT Eresko, 1986.

Yunus Husein, Bunga Rampai Anti Pencucian Uang, (Bandung: Books Terrace&Library,2007)

Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP : Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 20210 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahu 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2022 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2010 Nomor 122 Tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): January 2024

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.