Analysis of the Realization of Justice in the Discretion to Terminate Prosecution
(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Restorative justice is not just an orientation towards the goals of punishment, but has become the basic direction of criminal law enforcement in Indonesia. Settlement of criminal cases that do not have to go through formal justice process is the main jargon of restorative justice. Selecting cases that are appropriate or not to be submitted to court can be carried out by the public prosecutor with the authority to stop the prosecution. This article will analyze the discretion that the public prosecutor has to stop cases that are not suitable to be submitted to trial or through formal channels. This article was written using normative legal research methods with a conceptual approach. The results of this research are that restorative justice through discretion to terminate prosecution is a step to achieve justice in the case of public prosecutors facing cases that can be resolved using non-formal channels. Public prosecutors can facilitate alternative efforts for peace between perpetrators, victims and their families by becoming facilitators.
Keywords
References
Danardana, A., & Setyawan, V. P. (2022). KRIMINALISASI FENOMENA PENYIMPANGAN SOSIAL KUMPUL KEBO (SAMENLAVEN) DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA. Justitia et Pax, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v38i1.5713
Danial, M. A., Muhadar, & Ratnawati. (2022). Pelaksanaan Perja Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif (Implementation Of Prosecutor Regulation Number 15 Year 2020 About Termination Of Prosecutions Based On Restorative Justice). Jurnal Pro Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik, 11(1).
Halim, C., & Patria Setyawan, V. (2024). The Importance of Law Enforcement Based on Progressive Law in Realizing Community Welfare. 6(3). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3
Jannah, D. I., & Setyawan, V. P. (2023). MENILIK PENERAPAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM MUKA PERSIDANGAN DI INDONESIA. Verstek, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v10i4.73016
Kristanto, A. (2022). Kajian Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss1.art14
Kristiyadi, & Setyawan, V. P. (2022). Keadilan Restoratif dan Mediasi Penal Dalam Tindak Pidana Ringan. Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 4(1).
Macawalang, C. P., Elias, R. F., & Rompis, T. (2021). Penerapan dan Pengaruh Keadilan Restoratif sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. LEX CRIMEN, 10(5).
Mulya, B., Kencana, U., Cholidi, C., & Zuhdi, M. (2022). Asas Dominus Litis Bagi Kejaksaan dalam Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Undang-Undang. Wajah Hukum, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.950
Patria, V., & Kurniawan, I. dwi. (2022). CORRELATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PHILOSOPHY OF PANCASILA IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL SYSTEM. Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.33061/jgz.v11i2.7676
Rhiti, H., & Setyawan, V. P. (2023). The Role of Legal Philosophy in Forming the Rule of Law in Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(1). https://kumparan.com/febylestari026/peranan-filsafat-hukum-terhadap-hukumdi-indonesia-1uqrXdrs6Er/full,
Setyawan, V. P., & Wisnubroto, A. (n.d.). Legality of Discretionary Prosecution Principle in Terminating Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. In International Journal Of Global Community: Vol. VII (Issue 1).
Wibowo, R. H. (2021). PENDEKATAN KEADILAN RESTORATIVE DALAM PENGHENTIAN PENUNTUTAN BERDASARKAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.9.2.146-157
Article Metrics
Abstract View : 68 timesPDF Download : 20 times
DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v3i2.2744
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 vincent setyawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.