Analysis of the Realization of Justice in the Discretion to Terminate Prosecution

Authors

  • Itok Dwi Kurniawan Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Vincentius Patria Setyawan Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v3i2.2744

Keywords:

Termination Of Prosecution, Restorative Justice, Justice

Abstract

Restorative justice is not just an orientation towards the goals of punishment, but has become the basic direction of criminal law enforcement in Indonesia. Settlement of criminal cases that do not have to go through formal justice process is the main jargon of restorative justice. Selecting cases that are appropriate or not to be submitted to court can be carried out by the public prosecutor with the authority to stop the prosecution. This article will analyze the discretion that the public prosecutor has to stop cases that are not suitable to be submitted to trial or through formal channels. This article was written using normative legal research methods with a conceptual approach. The results of this research are that restorative justice through discretion to terminate prosecution is a step to achieve justice in the case of public prosecutors facing cases that can be resolved using non-formal channels. Public prosecutors can facilitate alternative efforts for peace between perpetrators, victims and their families by becoming facilitators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Danardana, A., & Setyawan, V. P. (2022). KRIMINALISASI FENOMENA PENYIMPANGAN SOSIAL KUMPUL KEBO (SAMENLAVEN) DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA. Justitia et Pax, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v38i1.5713

Danial, M. A., Muhadar, & Ratnawati. (2022). Pelaksanaan Perja Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif (Implementation Of Prosecutor Regulation Number 15 Year 2020 About Termination Of Prosecutions Based On Restorative Justice). Jurnal Pro Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik, 11(1).

Halim, C., & Patria Setyawan, V. (2024). The Importance of Law Enforcement Based on Progressive Law in Realizing Community Welfare. 6(3). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3

Jannah, D. I., & Setyawan, V. P. (2023). MENILIK PENERAPAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM MUKA PERSIDANGAN DI INDONESIA. Verstek, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v10i4.73016

Kristanto, A. (2022). Kajian Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss1.art14

Kristiyadi, & Setyawan, V. P. (2022). Keadilan Restoratif dan Mediasi Penal Dalam Tindak Pidana Ringan. Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 4(1).

Macawalang, C. P., Elias, R. F., & Rompis, T. (2021). Penerapan dan Pengaruh Keadilan Restoratif sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. LEX CRIMEN, 10(5).

Mulya, B., Kencana, U., Cholidi, C., & Zuhdi, M. (2022). Asas Dominus Litis Bagi Kejaksaan dalam Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Undang-Undang. Wajah Hukum, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.950

Patria, V., & Kurniawan, I. dwi. (2022). CORRELATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PHILOSOPHY OF PANCASILA IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL SYSTEM. Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.33061/jgz.v11i2.7676

Rhiti, H., & Setyawan, V. P. (2023). The Role of Legal Philosophy in Forming the Rule of Law in Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(1). https://kumparan.com/febylestari026/peranan-filsafat-hukum-terhadap-hukumdi-indonesia-1uqrXdrs6Er/full,

Setyawan, V. P., & Wisnubroto, A. (n.d.). Legality of Discretionary Prosecution Principle in Terminating Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. In International Journal Of Global Community: Vol. VII (Issue 1).

Wibowo, R. H. (2021). PENDEKATAN KEADILAN RESTORATIVE DALAM PENGHENTIAN PENUNTUTAN BERDASARKAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.9.2.146-157

Downloads

Published

2024-07-01

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): July 2024

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.