The Effect of Self-Assessment on the Eleventh Grade Students’ Writing Skill at SMAN 19 Kabupaten Tangerang

Authors

  • Iin Novia Sari Primagraha University, Indonesia
  • Mardiah Mardiah Primagraha University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v3i2.3761

Keywords:

Writing Skill, Self-Assessment, Quantitative Research

Abstract

Writing skill as one of skill which has to be mastered by students. The students will be easier and interested in writing process. One of the method to make students interest in writing skill is self-assessment. The researcher conducted the research at SMAN 19 Kab. Tangerang and took the sample from XI IPS 2 as experiment class and XI IPS 3 as control class. The objective of the research is to know whether using self-assessment differs students’ achievement in writing skill between students who are taught by using self-assessment and students who are not taught by self-assessment at the eleventh grade students of SMAN 19 Kab. Tangerang. The total number of sample used in one class consists of 40 students. The method applied in this research was quasi-experimental research. The design used in this method was non-equivalent control group design. It means that there were two classes which were taught by using two different methods. The experimental class was taught by self-assessment while control class was not taught by using self-assessment. There are pre-test, treatment and post- test conducted in this research. In the pre-test the researcher gave test on both classes with the same instrument. In the treatment the researcher taught the students in experiment class using  self-assessment while in the control class the researcher didn’t taught the students using self-assessment, she used conventional method in teaching. In the post test the researcher gave the test again to know the achievement of writing skill in both classes. Normality test results using chi square. It was obtained that all the data were normally distributed. From the calculation data result, it was obtained post-test data that mean score of the experiment class was 76.25 while the control class was 66.3 and the standard deviation score of experiment class was (6,45)2 = 9.87 while the standard deviation score of control class was (8,36)2 = 12.83 The t-test of post-test in significant level of 5% (α = 0,05) showed that t count = 3.8876 > t table = 1,9908, H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. it means that there is any significant difference of student’s writing skill between students in experiment class who were taught by self-assessment and the students in control class who were taught by using conventional method at SMAN 19 Kab. Tangerang.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing Learning Through Self Assessment . London: Kogan Page.

Brown, D. (2003). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. California. Longman

Brown, D. (2004). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Longman.

Dirgayesa. (2016). Writing a Genre Based Perspective. Jakarta: Kencana.

Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach English . England: Longman.

Kellog, Raulerson. (2009) Improving the Writing Skill of College Student.

Muijs, e. a. (2011). Effective Teaching Evidence and Practice. India: Sage.

Rani, T. (2016). Students Perception of Self-Assessment and the Use of Self-Assessment in English Writing Skill. Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya 14.

Riadi, E. (2014). Metode Statistika Parametrik & Nonparametrik untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan. Tangerang: Pustaka Mandiri.

Seow, Anthony. (2002) Methodology in Language Teaching. America: Cambridge University Press.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D . Bandung: Alfabeta.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo: Cambridge University Press.

Published

2024-01-16

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): January 2024

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.