Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Atas Penarikan Obat Sirup Berbahaya di Kecamatan Pangkalan Kerinci
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57235/helium.v2i1.4638Keywords:
Legal Protection, Consumer, Dangerous Syrup MedicineAbstract
The Some consumers choose to have limited knowledge about the fairness of the quality and price of goods/services. In the Law on Consumer Protection, there are several articles that regulate the prohibited acts for business actors, the obligations of business actors, and the rights of consumers. However, the problem is not only limited to the responsibility of drug stores, but there must be legal protection efforts for consumers who experience acute indigestion as a result of consuming dangerous syrup. The formulation of the first problem is how is the legal protection of consumers over the withdrawal of dangerous syrup in Pangkalan Kerinci District, secondly how is the responsibility of drug stores as business actors in providing legal protection to consumers over the withdrawal of dangerous syrup in Pangkalan Kerinci District. The research method in this thesis uses a type of sociological legal research, namely research on the effectiveness of laws that live in society. The data collection technique in this research is the interview method and literature review. Then after the data is collected, it is analyzed to draw conclusions. The research method in this thesis uses a type of sociological legal research that seeks truth in field facts. The result of the research is that legal protection against the withdrawal of dangerous syrup shows the importance of legal protection for consumers, especially in terms of safety and health. The Consumer Protection Law provides a strong legal basis to ensure consumer rights are protected, including in the case of dangerous drug recalls. If the syrup sold proves to be dangerous or contains unsafe ingredients, consumers are entitled to compensation or return of goods, as well as transparent information about the drug recall process. The responsibility of drug stores as business actors in providing legal protection to consumers for the withdrawal of dangerous syrup in Pangkalan Kerinci District such as compensation in the form of a refund or exchange of safe products. In this case, based on policies and procedures, business actors, namely drug stores can provide compensation in accordance with the losses suffered by consumers. In this study, it can be concluded that drug stores do not provide compensation or compensation money to consumers who come to return dangerous syrup drugs that have been withdrawn from circulation.
References
Abd Aziz. “Tugas dan Wewenang Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan (BPOM) dalam Rangka Perlindungan Konsumen, Al-Qānūn”. Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam. 23(1): 234
Amirullah,Imam Hardijo, Pengantar Bisnis,Graha Ilmu,Yogyakarta,2005,hlm 80
Ari Sudewi, dkk. 2020. “Perlindungan Hukum Badan Pengawas Obat Dan Makanan (BPOM) Terhadap Peredaran Produk Jamu Yang Mengandung Bahan Kimia Obat Berbahaya”. Jurnal Analogi Hukum. 2(2):250.
Erhian, PerlindunganKonsumen Terhadap Produk Makanan dan Minuman Kadaluarsa (Studi Kasus BPOM), Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion Vol.1 Edisi 4, 2020, hlm.2
Hananditia Rachma, Hidayah Sunar, Ratna Ilahi, dan Husna Lathifah, The Influence Of Sukses Ber-Kb Counseling Tool To Knowledge Of Oral Contraceptive Acceptors At Pharmacies In Malang, Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, April 2018, hal. 114-117.
Harry Duintjer Tebbens, International Product Liability, Netherland: Sijthoff & Noordhoff International Publisher, 1980. hlm 4
Inosentius Samsul, Perlindungan Konsumen, Kemungkinan Penerapan Tanggung Jawab Mutlak, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, 2004, hlm. 34
Janus Sidabalok, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014, hlm 213
Nurani Widjayanti, Obat-Obatan, Yogyakarta : Kanisius, 2002, hlm. 10.
Roberto Ranto. 2019. “Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Melalui Media Elektronik”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Alethea. 2(2)
Sidarta, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen,Grasindo,jakarta 2000 hlm 9
Soekidjo Notoatmodjo, Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan, Jakarta : Rineka Cipta, 2010, hlm. 49.
Ws Tampubolon. 2019. “Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Ditinjau Dari Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen”. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi. 4(1): 54.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
- Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
- Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to HELIUM: Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
- Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to HELIUM: Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanitiesa Publisher of the manuscript.
- Authors reserve the following:
- all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights;
- the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
- use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
- voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.
