Role Conflict and Language Diversity in Indian Judiciary: Challenges and Opportunities in Justice Delivery under NEP Provisions

Authors

  • Shrikant Singh CSJM University Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/ijrael.v4i2.5742

Keywords:

Language Diversity, Role Conflict, Indian Judiciary, National Education Policy (NEP) 2020

Abstract

With an emphasis on Kanpur, this study examines the effects of role conflict and linguistic diversity within the Indian court, especially in relation to the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the opportunities and problems associated with the incorporation of regional languages in legal education and court processes, and to investigate the role conflict experienced by legal professionals as a result of this change. The study also sought to assess how technology can help to lessen these difficulties. Based on the findings, it was determined that as legal professionals balance the competing objectives of linguistic inclusivity and legal clarity, language variety does, in fact, contribute to role conflict among them, especially among judges, attorneys, and legal aid workers. This supports the hypothesis that the integration of regional languages would exacerbate role conflict. Moreover, while the NEP 2020 presents opportunities to enhance access to justice for non-English-speaking populations, the study identified significant challenges such as a lack of trained multilingual professionals, insufficient resources, and delays in proceedings due to translation issues. The study also highlighted that technological solutions, although useful, are not yet sufficient to fully overcome these language barriers. Despite their potential, AI-driven tools and translation services remain inadequate for handling the complexities of legal language in diverse regional contexts. To sum up, NEP 2020 provides a way forward for a more diverse judiciary, but realising its full potential will need significant funding for bilingual legal materials, enhanced legal education, and more sophisticated IT infrastructure. In order to ensure that the legal system can better serve India's linguistically diverse people, these reforms are crucial for striking a balance between linguistic inclusion and the requirement for legal precision and efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gupta, S. "Legal Pluralism and Language Diversity in India: Challenges for the Judiciary." Journal of Indian Legal Studies, vol. 15, no. 2, 2022, pp. 112-130. https://ijlmh.com/paper/embracing-diversity-the-pluralistic-framework-of-the-indian-constitution/

Kumar, R. "NEP 2020 and the Promotion of Indian Languages in Legal Education." Indian Journal of Legal Education, vol. 9, no. 1, 2021, pp. 45-62. https://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/3390

Mishra, P. "Case Studies on the Use of Indian Languages in Lower Courts: Success and Challenges." Law and Language Review, vol. 18, no. 4, 2022, pp. 189-207. http://ili.ac.in/

Nair, V. "Judiciary and Language Provisions under NEP 2020: Preparedness and Challenges." Indian Journal of Judicial Reforms, vol. 23, no. 3, 2021, pp. 75-94. https://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/3390

Patel, D., and Rao, S. "Technology and Language Barriers in the Judiciary: A Way Forward." Indian Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, 2023, pp. 67-84. https://www.lawinsider.in/columns/the-integration-and-impact-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-indian-judiciary

Shah, R., and Menon, A. "Language Barriers and Access to Justice in India." Journal of Social Justice, vol. 12, no. 1, 2020, pp. 22-38. https://www.researchgate.net/

Singh, A. "Constitutional Provisions and the Use of Language in Indian Courts." Constitutional Law Review, vol. 27, no. 3, 2019, pp. 145-163. https://scholar.google.com/

Verma, N. "Legal Aid and the Promotion of Regional Languages in the Judiciary." Indian Legal Aid Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, 2020, pp. 90-108. https://www.indianlegalaidjournal.com/

Downloads

Published

2025-08-01

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): August 2025

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to IJRAEL: International Journal of Religion Education and Law Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to IJRAEL: International Journal of Religion Education and Law a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.