Reorientasi Pembelajaran PKn melalui Cybergogy sebagai Respons Krisis Kewargaan Digital: Systematic Literature Review Multidisiplin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57235/jerumi.v4i1.8707Keywords:
Cybergogy, krisis kewargaan digital, pembelajaran PKn, multidisiplinAbstract
Krisis kewargaan digital yang ditandai oleh disinformasi, polarisasi opini, dan perilaku tidak beradab pada ruang daring menuntut peninjauan ulang arah pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (PKn) pada jenjang perguruan tinggi. Tujuan kajian dirumuskan untuk menelaah secara multidisipliner dimensi krisis tersebut serta menyusun kerangka reorientasi pembelajaran PKn berbasis kerangka Cybergogy. Lokasi penelusuran dokumen meliputi basis data Scopus, Web of Science, Garuda Kemdikbudristek, dan Google Scholar. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kepustakaan sistematis terhadap tiga puluh tiga dokumen akademik dari bidang pendidikan, psikologi, sosiologi-komunikasi, dan ilmu politik yang terbit antara tahun 1994 hingga 2025, dianalisis melalui teknik sintesis tematik. Hasil kajian menunjukkan tiga dimensi krisis kewargaan digital, yakni krisis epistemik, krisis psikososial, dan krisis deliberatif-politik, yang berkorespondensi dengan tiga domain Cybergogy, yaitu kognitif, emosi, dan sosial. Korespondensi tersebut melandasi Model Reorientasi PKn-Cybergogy sebagai peta operasional pembelajaran PKn yang responsif terhadap krisis kewargaan digital bagi generasi warga negara digital.
Downloads
References
Amiruddin, A., Baharuddin, F. R., Takbir, T., Setialaksana, W., & Hasim, M. (2023). Pedagogy-andragogy continuum with cybergogy to promote self-regulated learning: A structural equation model approach. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 811–824. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.811
Banks, J. A. (2003). Teaching literacy for social justice and global citizenship. Language Arts, 81(1), 18–19.
Boyd, d. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.Center for Civic Education. (1994). National standards for civics and government.
Center for Civic Education. (1994). National standards for civics and government. Center for Civic Education.
Choi, M. (2016). A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education in the internet age. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549
Fajri, I., Budimansyah, D., & Komalasari, K. (2022). Digital citizenship in civic education learning: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 10(3), 833–854. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v10i3.755
Ghosn-Chelala, M. (2018). Exploring sustainable learning and practice of digital citizenship: Education and place-based challenges. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 14(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197918759155
Heath, M. K. (2018). What kind of (digital) citizen? A between-studies analysis of research and teaching for democracy. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(5), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2018-0067
Iskandar, S., & Nurgiansah, T. H. (2022). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan dan literasi digital di era post-truth. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 12(2), 85–96.
James, C., Weinstein, E., & Mendoza, K. (2021). Teaching digital citizens in today's world: Research and insights behind the Common Sense K–12 Digital Citizenship Curriculum (3rd ed.). Common Sense Media.
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. MIT Press.
M., Bailey, G., & Ross, T. W. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1), 6–9.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. MIT Press.
Mureșan, M. (2014). Using cybergogy and andragogy paradigms in lifelong learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4722–4726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1015
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2019). 'Personal data literacies': A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 21(2), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523Ribble,
Richardson, J., & Milovidov, E. (2019). Digital citizenship education handbook: Being online, well-being online, and rights online. Council of Europe.
Ribble, M., Bailey, G., & Ross, T. W. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(1), 6–9.
Sırvermez, U., & Onan, B. C. (2025). Digital citizenship education: An in-depth study of teaching practices and research insights. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2542890
Suhaimi, N. A., Adnan, M., & Puteh, M. (2020). Promoting transformative mathematical learning through heutagogy, paragogy and cybergogy approaches. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(10), 481–497.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
Tadlaoui-Brahmi, A., Çuko, K., & Alvarez, L. (2022). Digital citizenship in primary education: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100348
Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining ‘fake news’: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
Tapingkae, P., Panjaburee, P., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). Effects of a formative assessment-based contextual gaming approach on students' digital citizenship behaviours, learning motivations, and perceptions. Computers & Education, 159, 103998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103998
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy and completely unprepared for adulthood. Atria Books.Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Wang, M., & Kang, M. (2006). Cybergogy for engaged learning: A framework for creating learner engagement through information and communication technology. Dalam D. Hung & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Engaged learning with emerging technologies (hlm. 225–253). Springer.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe.
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237
Winataputra, U. S. (2015). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan: Refleksi historis-epistemologis dan rekonstruksi untuk masa depan. Universitas Terbuka.
Winataputra, U. S. (2016). Posisi akademik Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan (PKn) dalam konteks sistem pendidikan nasional. Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan, 1(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.21067/jmk.v1i1.1184
Winataputra, U. S., & Budimansyah, D. (2007). Civic education: Konteks, landasan, bahan ajar, dan kultur kelas. Program Studi Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Winataputra, U. S., & Budimansyah, D. (2012). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan dalam perspektif internasional: Konteks, teori, dan profil pembelajaran. Widya Aksara Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 M. Januar Ibnu Adham, M. Januar Ibnu Adham, T Heru Nurgiansah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
- Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to JERUMI: Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
- Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to JERUMI: Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary a Publisher of the manuscript.
- Authors reserve the following:
- all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights;
- the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
- use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
- voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.
