Strategy of the Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Detachment in Responding to a Novel Disease Pandemic (A Case Study of Assistance Operations in Natuna in 2020)

Authors

  • Robert Eryanto Tumanggor Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Sigit Purwanto Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Sugiri Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/jerumi.v4i2.8936

Keywords:

Strategy, Assistance Operations, Pandemic

Abstract

Novel disease pandemics have demonstrated that biological threats can significantly affect national stability, public health, and national resilience. Normatively, the Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Engineering Detachment (Denzinubika), as the Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) unit of the Indonesian Army, is expected to possess optimal capabilities in supporting Military Operations Other Than War (MOOTW) for pandemic response. However, the implementation of assistance operations is still influenced by various internal and external factors that affect the effectiveness of the unit’s mission. This study aims to analyze these factors and formulate strategies for enhancing Denzinubika’s capabilities in addressing future biological threats. This study employed a qualitative descriptive method, with data collected through interviews, document studies, and field observations. Data analysis was conducted using the Miles and Huberman model, consisting of data collection, data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The analytical framework used in this study includes the Ends-Ways-Means Strategy Theory of Arthur F. Lykke Jr. (1989), Defense Theory of Barry Buzan (1991), Capacity Building Theory of Grindle (1997), and Military Readiness Theory of James J. Tritten (1994).The findings indicate that the factors influencing pandemic assistance operations include personnel competence, CBRN capabilities and equipment, organizational structure, operational experience, policy support, technological development, cross-sector cooperation, and the dynamics of biological threats. The required strategies include strengthening organizational capacity, improving personnel capabilities, modernizing CBRN facilities and infrastructure, and enhancing cooperation and interoperability. The study concludes that strengthening organizational capacity and integrated operational readiness are key factors in ensuring Denzinubika’s effectiveness in responding to novel disease pandemics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barry Buzan. (1991). People, states and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post-Cold War era (2nd ed.). Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Boland, T. (2023). Civil-military cooperation in pandemic response: Lessons from global health emergencies. Routledge.

Grindle, M. S. (1997). Getting good government: Capacity building in the public sectors of developing countries. Harvard Institute for International Development.

Lykke, A. F., Jr. (1989). Defining military strategy: Ends, ways, means. U.S. Army War College.

NATO Standardization Office. (2022). Allied Joint Doctrine for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defence (AJP-3.8 Edition C Version 1). NATO.

Ries, T., Egnell, R., & Ördén, H. (2022). Military support to civil authorities during pandemics: Civil-military coordination and resilience. Routledge.

Tritten, J. J. (1994). Military readiness: Concepts, choices, consequences. Naval War College Press.

Tuser, M., Jansky, P., & Petras, M. (2021). Military preparedness for pandemic response: Lessons from COVID-19. Journal of Defense Management, 11(3), 1–12.

World Health Organization. (2023). National civil-military health collaboration framework for strengthening health emergency preparedness, response and resilience. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2024). COVID-19 epidemiological update and global health emergency preparedness. World Health Organization.

Farhat, R., Al-Masri, A., & Hassan, M. (2024). Organizational preparedness for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) threats: Challenges and future directions. Journal of Emergency Management, 22(1), 55–69.

World Health Organization. (2023). National civil-military health collaboration framework for strengthening health emergency preparedness, response and resilience. World Health Organization.

Buzan, B. (1991). People, states and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post-Cold War era (2nd ed.). Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Grindle, M. S. (1997). Getting good government: Capacity building in the public sectors of developing countries. Harvard Institute for International Development.

Lykke, A. F., Jr. (1989). Defining military strategy: Ends, ways, means. U.S. Army War College.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-26

How to Cite

Robert Eryanto Tumanggor, Sigit Purwanto, & Sugiri. (2026). Strategy of the Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Detachment in Responding to a Novel Disease Pandemic (A Case Study of Assistance Operations in Natuna in 2020). Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary, 4(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.57235/jerumi.v4i2.8936

Citation Check