
*corresponding author
AbstractThis study aims to improve natural science (IPA) learning achievement using the Multy Reprecentacy (DMR) Discourse learning model. This study is a class action research conducted with two (2) cycles. Each cycle consists of three (3) meetings, namely two (2) meetings for the learning process and one (1) meeting for achievement tests that are done independently. Each cycle follows the stages of the Kemmis and Taggart model which includes four components: planning, action, observation and reflection. The data collected in this study is the result of research related to the implementation of learning using the Multy Reprecentacy (DMR) Discourse model on natural science (IPA) material. Data collection techniques use test and non-test techniques with descriptive and qualitative approaches. The results showed that the use of the Multy Reprecentacy (DMR) Discourse model in natural science learning activities can improve student achievement. This increase in prestige is the effect of better and conductive teaching and learning activities of teachers and students. The success of this increase in learning achievement can be seen from the increase in learning achievement scores after conducting achievement tests with the "Multy Reprecentacy (DMR) Discourse" model, compared to learning using the lecture method. So learning using the "Multy Reprecentacy (DMR) Discourse" model, is proven to increase the achievement of science (science) for junior high school students.
KeywordsMulty Reprecentacy (DMR) Discourse, Improving Achievement, Junior High School Students.
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.57235/jetish.v2i1.423 |
Article metrics10.57235/jetish.v2i1.423 Abstract views : 162 | PDF views : 166 |
Cite |
Full Text![]() |
References
Agus Suprijono. 2009. Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
Andi Offset
Arends, Richald. 1997. Classroom Instructional Management. New York: The McGraw-Hill Company
Arief Sadiman. 1993. Media Pendidikan. Jakarta : Rajawali
Arikunto Suharsimi, 2007. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Aris Munandar, 2002. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Hand Out Diklat Guru SLTP.
E. Mulyasa, 2009. Praktek Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung : PT Rosdakarya
Hamalik, O., (2011), Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Poerwadarminta W.J.S. 1995. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : PKG Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Rusman, dkk (2011) Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi : Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta:Rajawali Pers. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Saefudin Azwar,1987. Tes Prestasi Belajar. Jakarta : Liberty
Sri Surini. dkk. 1995. Psikologi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Sudirman. (2011). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta : PT. Grafindo Indonesia
Supriyadi. 2007. Kurikulim Sains Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Sains. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Tempelsari
Suryabrata Sumadi, 2002. Proses Belajar Mengajar Di Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta :
Suyanto, (1996). Pedoman Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: Yogyakarta: UP35D IKIP Bandung: Angkasa
Trianto, 2010. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasinya dalam KTSP.. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Usman Samatowa. (2010). Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Yogyakarta : BPG
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Sarjito Sarjito

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.