Analysis Regarding Brand Dispute Cases Based on Case Study of Decision Number 4 Pk/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2023

Jeane Neltje Saly(1), Ivana Trixie(2), Margaretha Putri(3), Pricillia Imanuela(4), Angeline Wellvy Santoso(5),


(1) Universitas Tarumanagara
(2) Universitas Tarumanagara
(3) Universitas Tarumanagara
(4) Universitas Tarumanagara
(5) Universitas Tarumanagara
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Brand is a very important thing for the business world, especially for business people, because the brand is the identity of a product or company that is very valuable. A well-known brand from the United States, namely TIMBERLAND, is in dispute with a local brand, namely TIMBERLAKE, judging from the sentence that dominates the word "TIMBER" and from its mention it can confuse consumers. The registration of the TIMBERLAKE trademark had bad faith and wanted to piggyback on the well-known American brand, TIMBERLAND, because there were similarities in the marks that were detrimental to the plaintiff.


Keywords


Analysis, Dispute, Brand

References


Abduh, R., & Fajaruddin, F. (2021). Intellectual Property Rights Protection Function In Resolving Copyright Disputes. International Journal Reglement & Society (Ijrs), 2(3), 170-178.

Bafadhal, T. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Merek Terkenal di Indonesia. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 21-41.

Denny, D., Liegestu, Y. P., Novika, N., & Patros, A. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Di Indonesia: Studi Putusan. SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS, 7(2), 148-163.ro Law Journal, 11(1).

Dinata, E. (2020). Larangan Keberlakuan Surut Pada Aturan Merek Dalam Studi Kasus Sengketa Merek. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 3(2), 201-212.

Kusuma, I. A. S. D., & Sugama, I. D. G. D. (2020). Upaya Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Terkenal. Jurnal Hukum Kertha Wicara, 9(3).

Masnun, M. A. (2021). Disparitas Putusan Mengenai Persamaan Pada Pokoknya Pada Merek Predator (Studi Putusan Nomor 1146 K/Pdt. Sus-Hki/2020). SASI, 27(4), 463-474.

Perlindungan merek, Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia (2018) Jakarta.

Prof. Dr. Rahmi Jened, S.H., M.H., (2017) Hukum merek, KENCANA.

Sujatmiko, A. (2016). Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 15 tahun 2001. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 2(1), 169-191.

Tala, W. S. S. (2006). Identifikasi Faktor-faktor Penyebab Sengketa Merek Terkenal (Studi Atas Putusan Pengadilan) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Sumatera Utara).

Wibipratama, D. I., Santoso, B., & Saptono, H. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Sengketa Merek Terkenal Varivas Studi Putusan (No: 5/Pdt. Sus-Merek/2019/Pn. Niaga Jkt. Pst). Diponego

Widyanti, Y. E. (2021). The legal instrument of protecting traditional cultural expressions ownership in intellectual property rights law. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 21, 492.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 57 times
PDF Download : 76 times

DOI: 10.57235/jetish.v2i2.834

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jeane Neltje Saly, Ivana Trixie, Margaretha Putri, Pricillia Imanuela, Angeline Wellvy Santoso

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.