Fraud Crime through Electronic System Based on Indonesian Positive Law (Decision Study No: 1356/PID/B/2016/PN.BDG)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i1.508Keywords:
Law Enforcement, Fraud, Electronic TransactionsAbstract
Today's criminal acts of fraud continue to develop following the development of existing technology, existing legal regulations function to overcome this, but existing regulations cannot reduce these crimes but increase them. This study aims to find out how existing law enforcement is against criminal acts of fraud through electronic systems, knowing various kinds of inhibiting factors in enforcing criminal law against a crime of fraud. This research was carried out using normative juridical methods through library research by examining secondary data including regulations legislation, research results, scientific journals and references. The results of the study provide an illustration, where criminal acts of fraud through electronic systems are in principle the same as fraud in conventional ways, but the difference lies in the evidence or means of action, namely using electronic systems (computers, internet, telecommunication devices), because that is law enforcement. Fraud crimes can still be overcome by Article 378 of the Criminal Code concerning fraud and Article 28 Paragraph (1) of the ITE Law concerning Information and Electronic Transactions Furthermore, obstacles in law enforcement against criminal acts of fraud based on electronic transactions are still influenced by five factors, namely legal factors, law enforcement factors , factors of facilities or facilities that support law enforcement, social factors and cultural factors.
References
Budiastant, D. E. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum.
Fitriani. (2021). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana. Peminatan Hukum Pidana.
pasal 28 ayat 1 UU ITE tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik
Pasal 378 KUHP tentang penipuan
Prasetyo, R. D. (2014). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana . Fakultas Hukum Malang.
Rahmanto, T. Y. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Berbasis Transaksi Elektronik. Jurnal penelitian Hukum De Jure, 31-36.
Siahaan, S. (2020). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Penipuan Arisan Berbasis Online. Fakultas Komputer Indonesia.
Sitompul, J. (2012). Cyberspace, Cybercrimes, Cyberlaw: Tinjauan Aspek Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Tatanusa.
Soekanto, S. a. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Suhariyanto, B. (2012). Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime), Urgensi Pengaturan Dan Celah Hukumnya. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Sumadi, H. (2015). Kendala Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Penipuan Transaksi Elektronik Di Indonesia. Jurnal Wawasan Hukum, 175-193.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
