Food Aid Airdrop Strategy in the 2025 Joint Humanitarian Operation in Gaza
Keywords:
Airdrop, Humanitarian Logistics, Food Aid, LCLA, and Garuda Merah Putih Task ForceAbstract
The prolonged conflict between Palestine and Israel has generated a severe humanitarian crisis, particularly in the Gaza Strip, where civilians face major difficulties in obtaining basic necessities due to the blockade and the intensity of Israeli attacks. In this context, food-aid airdrop operations have emerged as an effective alternative for reaching affected areas that are inaccessible through land routes. This study aims to analyze the strategy and operational constraints of food-aid airdrops conducted as part of the joint operation of the GARUDA Merah Putih Task Force in the 2025 Gaza humanitarian mission. The research adopts a qualitative case-study approach grounded in Arthur F. Lykke, Jr.’s strategic theory, Wassenhove’s humanitarian logistics preparedness model, and NATO’s military logistics framework. The findings indicate that the implementation of food-aid airdrops in the Gaza joint humanitarian operation involved a high level of complexity. Accordingly, the airdrop strategy was carried out through an integrated sequence of stages, encompassing planning, mobilization of personnel and equipment, execution of the drops, and post-operation evaluation and termination. The GARUDA Merah Putih Task Force successfully prepared and delivered 520 aid bundles (approximately 91.4 tons of food supplies) using the Low Cost Low Altitude (LCLA) method with a high level of delivery accuracy. Nevertheless, the operation encountered several challenges, including limited rigging equipment, shortages of qualified personnel, changes in flight clearances, and the absence of pre-deployment training. Based on these insights, the study recommends: (1) strengthening the stock of internationally standardized rigging equipment in each Army Logistics (Bekang) unit, (2) conducting internationally scaled joint training for cross-service humanitarian operations, and (3) developing TNI doctrine specifically for global humanitarian missions.
References
Amnesty International. (2024). Gaza: Starvation and denial of humanitarian access as a weapon of war. Amnesty International.
Bin Xu, & Chen, J. (2016). Precision airdrop systems and their application in humanitarian relief operations. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2016, 1–12.
Elmali, S. (2023). Escalation dynamics and humanitarian implications of the Israel–Palestine conflict. Journal of International Security Studies, 8(2), 45–61.
Lykke, A. F., Jr. (1998). Military strategy: Theory and application. U.S. Army War College.
Manurung, H., & Heriamsal. (2024). Diplomasi kemanusiaan Indonesia dalam konflik Palestina–Israel. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Indonesia, 12(1), 67–82.
Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.
Lykke, A. F., Jr. (1998). Military strategy: Theory and application. U.S. Army War College.
NATO. (2018). Allied joint doctrine for logistics (AJP-4). NATO Standardization Office.
Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Lykke, A. F., Jr. (1998). Military strategy: Theory and application. U.S. Army War College.
NATO. (2018). Allied joint doctrine for logistics (AJP-4). NATO Standardization Office.
Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.
Amnesty International. (2024). Gaza: Starvation and denial of humanitarian access as a weapon of war. Amnesty International.
Bin Xu, & Chen, J. (2016). Precision airdrop systems and their application in humanitarian relief operations. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2016, 1–12.
Lykke, A. F., Jr. (1998). Military strategy: Theory and application. U.S. Army War College.
NATO. (2018). Allied joint doctrine for logistics (AJP-4). NATO Standardization Office.
Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.
Lykke, A. F. (1998). Toward an understanding of military strategy. U.S. Army War College.
Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.
NATO. (2018). Allied Joint Doctrine for Logistics (AJP-4). North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
Amnesty International. (2024). Israel/Occupied Palestinian Territory: Humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Bin Xu, & Chen, J. (2016). Optimization of humanitarian logistics for airdrop operations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 18, 17–26.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).