(2) Thomas Thomas
(3) Tasdik Tasdik
*corresponding author
AbstractThe prolonged conflict between Palestine and Israel has generated a severe humanitarian crisis, particularly in the Gaza Strip, where civilians face major difficulties in obtaining basic necessities due to the blockade and the intensity of Israeli attacks. In this context, food-aid airdrop operations have emerged as an effective alternative for reaching affected areas that are inaccessible through land routes. This study aims to analyze the strategy and operational constraints of food-aid airdrops conducted as part of the joint operation of the GARUDA Merah Putih Task Force in the 2025 Gaza humanitarian mission. The research adopts a qualitative case-study approach grounded in Arthur F. Lykke, Jr.’s strategic theory, Wassenhove’s humanitarian logistics preparedness model, and NATO’s military logistics framework. The findings indicate that the implementation of food-aid airdrops in the Gaza joint humanitarian operation involved a high level of complexity. Accordingly, the airdrop strategy was carried out through an integrated sequence of stages, encompassing planning, mobilization of personnel and equipment, execution of the drops, and post-operation evaluation and termination. The GARUDA Merah Putih Task Force successfully prepared and delivered 520 aid bundles (approximately 91.4 tons of food supplies) using the Low Cost Low Altitude (LCLA) method with a high level of delivery accuracy. Nevertheless, the operation encountered several challenges, including limited rigging equipment, shortages of qualified personnel, changes in flight clearances, and the absence of pre-deployment training. Based on these insights, the study recommends: (1) strengthening the stock of internationally standardized rigging equipment in each Army Logistics (Bekang) unit, (2) conducting internationally scaled joint training for cross-service humanitarian operations, and (3) developing TNI doctrine specifically for global humanitarian missions. KeywordsAirdrop, Humanitarian Logistics, Food Aid, LCLA, and Garuda Merah Putih Task Force
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7725 |
Article metrics10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7725 Abstract views : 0 | PDF views : 0 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
Amnesty International. (2024). Gaza: Starvation and denial of humanitarian access as a weapon of war. Amnesty International.
Bin Xu, & Chen, J. (2016). Precision airdrop systems and their application in humanitarian relief operations. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2016, 1–12.
Elmali, S. (2023). Escalation dynamics and humanitarian implications of the Israel–Palestine conflict. Journal of International Security Studies, 8(2), 45–61.
Lykke, A. F., Jr. (1998). Military strategy: Theory and application. U.S. Army War College.
Manurung, H., & Heriamsal. (2024). Diplomasi kemanusiaan Indonesia dalam konflik Palestina–Israel. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Indonesia, 12(1), 67–82.
Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.
Lykke, A. F., Jr. (1998). Military strategy: Theory and application. U.S. Army War College.
NATO. (2018). Allied joint doctrine for logistics (AJP-4). NATO Standardization Office.
Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Lykke, A. F., Jr. (1998). Military strategy: Theory and application. U.S. Army War College.
NATO. (2018). Allied joint doctrine for logistics (AJP-4). NATO Standardization Office.
Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.
Amnesty International. (2024). Gaza: Starvation and denial of humanitarian access as a weapon of war. Amnesty International.
Bin Xu, & Chen, J. (2016). Precision airdrop systems and their application in humanitarian relief operations. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2016, 1–12.
Lykke, A. F., Jr. (1998). Military strategy: Theory and application. U.S. Army War College.
NATO. (2018). Allied joint doctrine for logistics (AJP-4). NATO Standardization Office.
Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.
Lykke, A. F. (1998). Toward an understanding of military strategy. U.S. Army War College.
Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.
NATO. (2018). Allied Joint Doctrine for Logistics (AJP-4). North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
Amnesty International. (2024). Israel/Occupied Palestinian Territory: Humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Bin Xu, & Chen, J. (2016). Optimization of humanitarian logistics for airdrop operations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 18, 17–26.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sumarna Sumarna, Thomas Thomas, Tasdik Tasdik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






















Download