Peran Restorative Justice Sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan Anak
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57235/jclhr.v1i2.5436Keywords:
restorative justice, child criminalization, SPPA, rehabilitation, social stigmaAbstract
Implementation of restorative justice as an alternative to child punishment in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA) based on Law No. 11 of 2012. This approach prioritizes rehabilitation and social reintegration, rather than imprisonment, to protect the best interests of children and reduce negative impacts such as social stigma. Children in conflict with the law require different treatment from adults because their physical, mental, and emotional development is not yet mature. The restorative justice approach involves perpetrators, victims, families, and communities in resolving conflicts through deliberation and recovery. However, its implementation still faces obstacles, such as a lack of understanding from the community and law enforcement. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory regulatory approach, legal theory, and analysis from expert perspectives. The results of the study indicate that restorative justice is effective in reducing recidivism, supporting social reintegration, and protecting children's rights. In conclusion, the implementation of restorative justice needs to be supported by community education, training for law enforcement officers, and cooperation between families, schools, and communities to ensure that rehabilitation runs optimally and has a positive impact on the future of children.
Downloads
References
Ali, Mahrus. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
BBC Indonesia. “Kasus penganiayaan : AG divonis 3,5 tahun penjara karena terbukti ‘turut serta’ dalam ‘penganiayaan berat yang direncanakan.’” April 10, 2023. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-64827317.
Bohm, Robert M., and Keith N. Haley. Introduction to Criminal Justice. 2. ed. New York: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, 1998.
Hamzah, Andi. Asas-asas hukum pidana. Jakarta: Yarsif Watampone, 2005.
Hasan, Hasbi. “Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 2, no. 2 (2013): 247–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.247-262.
Herlina, Apong. Perlindungan Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadap Dengan Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
Isba, Penias, Marius Suprianto Sakmaf, and Jumiran. “Evaluasi Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Pidana: Perspektif Korban Dan Pelaku Evaluation of Restorative Justice.” DELICTUM: JURNAL HUKUM PIDANA DAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM 3, no. 1 (2024): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.35905/delictum.v3i1.10736.
Kurniasi, Ririn. “Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Anak yang Menjadi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Melalui Diversi.” Unes Law Review 6, no. 4 (June 2024): 10821–28. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.
Rahayu, Sri. “Diversi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Yang DIlakukan Anak Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi 6, no. 1 (n.d.): 127–42.
Schwartz, Martin, and Suzanne E. Hatty, eds. Controversies in Critical Criminology. 0 ed. Routledge, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722047.
Silaban, Daud, Stephanus Pelor, and Appe Hutauruk. “Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Anak Yang Menjalani Proses Hukum Dalam Lingkup Pengadilan.” Yure Humano 6, no. 2 (2022): 1–29.
Sistem Peradilan Anak Di Indonesia. Universitas Pancasila: Fakultas Hukum, n.d. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CToNtYgrTsQ.
Sunarso, Siswanto. Viktimologi dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Cetakan pertama. Rawamangun, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
“Terdakwa Penusukan Anak Perempuan di Cimahi divonis 18 Tahun Penjara.” April 12, 2023. https://cimahikota.go.id/index.php/berita/detail/82125-tok!-terdakwa-penusukan-anak-perempuan-di-cimahi-divonis-18-tahun-penjara.
Tunggal, Hadi Setia. UU RI Nomor 11 Tahun 2012. Jakarta: Harvarindo, 2013.
UTRECHT, E. Hukum Pidana I : Suatu Pengantar. Atkola Surabaya: Pustaka Tinta Mas, 1994.
Wala, Gevan Naufal., & Firmansyah, Hery. "Konsep Restorative Justice Untuk Mengurangi Over Capacity Pada Perkara Pidana." Jurnal Kertha Semaya 12, no. 2 (2024): 247-254.
Wahid, Eriyantouw. Keadilan Restoratif Dan Peradilan Konvensional Dalam Hukum Pidana. Cet. 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Trisakti, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
- Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
- Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to HELIUM: Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
- Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to HELIUM: Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanitiesa Publisher of the manuscript.
- Authors reserve the following:
- all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights;
- the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
- use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
- voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.










