Efforts to Resolve Breach of Contract in Banking Credit Agreements (A Study of Decision No. 4/Pdt.G.S/2024/PN. Trt)

Authors

  • Joel Fredly Pakpahan Univesitas HKBP Nommensen, Indonesia
  • Debora Debora Univesitas HKBP Nommensen, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/hemat.v2i1.5203

Keywords:

Contract in Banking Credit

Abstract

The granting of credit by banks to debtors is not solely based on trust but also adheres to the principle of prudence, taking into account the risks and feasibility of the debtor. One crucial step in credit agreements is the application of the 5C principles (Capacity, Capital, Character, Collateral, Condition), aimed at assessing the debtor's ability and suitability to fulfill their obligations. However, in the implementation of credit agreements, defaults or breaches of contract by debtors often occur, whether due to negligence, intentional actions, or force majeure. Defaults may include the debtor's inability to meet their debt obligations as agreed upon. To resolve this issue, two resolution pathways can be taken: litigation through the courts and non-litigation alternatives such as debt restructuring, rescheduling, and payment postponement. In court resolutions, simple lawsuit procedures are one of the methods used to handle default disputes efficiently. The case of default in the credit agreement between PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia and debtors Thamrin Simanjuntak and Riahta Sembiring illustrates the importance of the application of the principle of pacta sunt servanda in contractual agreements, where debtors are obligated to fulfill payment obligations as agreed. In cases of default, debtors are at risk of sanctions in the form of compensation in accordance with applicable legal provisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baneftar, F. A. (2020). “Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan dengan Jaminan Sertifikat Tanah Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren, 1(2), 139–156.

Edison, E., Wijayati, R. A., & Napitupulu, D. R. W. (2023). “Strategi Penyelesaian Kredit selama Pandemi COVID-19”. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, 3(2), 1464–1478.

Khairunisa, M., & Musrifah, M. (2020). “Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah pada Bank Syariah”. Islamic Business and Finance, 1(1).

Priyanto, M. A., & Ubaidillah, L. (2024). “Tinjauan Yuridis Gugatan Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Kredit (Studi Putusan PN Bondowoso Nomor: 3/Pdt.GS/2021/PN.Bdw)”. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 2(1), 7.

Rianti, R., Utari, Y. D., Safitri, R., & Nisa, N. (2024). “Analisis Efektivitas Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Bisnis (Litigasi dan Nonlitigasi) dalam Menjaga Kelangsungan dan Pertumbuhan Usaha”. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 3(12), 11–24.

Salim, S., & Sili, E. B. (2022). “Analisis Yuridis Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Kredit (Studi Putusan Nomor 10/Pdt.GS/2020/PN.Bjw)”. Commerce Law, 2(2).

Fuady, M. (2011). Pengantar Hukum Bisnis: Menata Bisnis Modern di Era Global.

Kamsir, B., & Lainnya, L. K. (2002). Edisi Keenam. PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian Hukum.

Muhammad, S. (2012). Hukum Kontrak (Segi Pengayaan Hukum Perikatan).

Usman, R. (2001). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perbankan di Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Yahman, S. H. (2017). Karakteristik Wanprestasi & Tindak Pidana Penipuan. Prenada Media

Downloads

Published

2025-01-29

How to Cite

Pakpahan, J. F., & Debora, D. (2025). Efforts to Resolve Breach of Contract in Banking Credit Agreements (A Study of Decision No. 4/Pdt.G.S/2024/PN. Trt). Journal of Humanities Education Management Accounting and Transportation, 2(1), 717–721. https://doi.org/10.57235/hemat.v2i1.5203

Citation Check