Peran Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen dan Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Sektor Jasa Keuangan Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen

Authors

  • Manula Agapa Universitas Pasundan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57235/jlc.v1i1.6096

Keywords:

Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency, Institutions of Alternative Dispute Settlement in Financial Service Sector, Authority, Dispute

Abstract

The estabilishment of alternative dispute settlement institutions in the financial service sector by financial services authorithy as if it wants to compete with the existence of consumer dispute settlement agency. The estabilishment institutions of alternative dispute settlement in the financial service sector on the basic of financial service authority regulatory law number 1 year 2014 on the financial service authority, while consumer dispute settlement agency formed by the law number 8 year 1999. Verdict generated by these two institutions are final and binding, however against the verdict institutions of alternative dispute settlement in the financial service sector cannot be impelemnted if the consumer does not accept the verdict, giving rise to the possibility for financial service businesses to submit district court (of justice). Another case with verdict of the consumer dispute settlement agency it can be objected in district court (of justice) by one of the parties does not accept the verdict. The prosecuting authority (competence) of the institutions of alternative dispute resolution financial service sector and consumer dispute resolution has not been regulation, so that dualism in handling consumer disputes settlement agency. This is evidenced by the many disputes between the consumer banking or non-banking and non-financial services businesses were marked by consumer dispute settlement agency. Therefore need for strict regulation regarding the authority or competence of an absolute judge of these two institutions and needs for improvement of the legislation to get around this legal weaknes shortcomings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan Ke-2. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010).

Anderson, R.A. dan W.A. Krumpt. Business Law. Ed.9. (Cincinnati: South- Western Publishing Co., 1972).

Arimbi. Lika Liku Perjalanan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. (Jakarta: YLKI, 2001).

Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus. “Perlindungan terhadap Konsumen Dilihat dari Sudut Perjanjian Baku (Standar) dalam BPHN”. Simposium Aspek-aspek Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. (Bandung: Binacipta, 1986).

D., Mukti Fajar N. dan Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Cetakan Ke-1.

Hardjasoemantri, Koesnadi. Hukum Tata Lingkungan. (Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1994).

Irianto, Sulistyowati dan Shidarta. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Konstelasi dan Refleksi). (Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2009).

Kee, Ho Peng. “Consumer Protection in Singapore”. ASEAN Law Association. Record of the Proceedings of the General Assembly and Conference of the ASEAN Law Association. Vol.3. (Singapore: ALA, 1984).

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005).

Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan Ke-9. (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014).

Downloads

Published

2025-05-08

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Juni 2025

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors dont transfer or license the copyright of publishing to JLC: Justice Legislation and Crime Journal Research to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby dont agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to JLC: Justice Legislation and Crime Journal a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC License.