Analysis of Court Decisions in Divorce Lawsuits which were Rejected Due to Failure to Fulfill the Dispute Proof Requirements: Case Study of the Binjai District Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v3i2.4175Keywords:
Divorve, Law, CourtAbstract
The desired divorce or divorce status can be achieved if it is carried out in accordance with existing procedures. Such as, the conditions on how a relationship is allowed to divorce, the reasons put forward are valid or not, the procedures followed are appropriate or not, this is very important to pay attention to. The author will analyze the Court Decision in a divorce lawsuit which was rejected because the evidentiary requirements were not fulfilled. dispute: case study of the Binjai District Court. The method used in this research uses qualitative research methods, namely case studies with a normative legal research or doctrinal research approach, using secondary data. In divorce cases, the plaintiff must be able to prove that the plaintiff is involved in a dispute that fulfill the divorce requirements according to applicable law. In Indonesia, the requirements for divorce are regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. One of the grounds for divorce is the existence of a dispute that cannot be reconciled or it could be said to be a prolonged conflict between husband and wife. The court rejected the divorce lawsuit because the requirements for proving the dispute were not fulfilled. This decision shows how important the principles of evidence and legal certainty are in divorce cases. Divorce cannot be granted if there is no strong evidence that the dispute cannot be resolved.
References
Ariano, P. Permohonan Gugatan Perceraian Yang Ditolak Hakim Dalam Putusan NO. 247/PDT. G/2021/PN. PLG.
Hartono, R. (2014). Keyakinan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Perceraian (Studi Terhadap Putusan-Putusan Hakim Peradilan Agama Ambarawa). Unnes Law Journal, 3(2).
Hidayah, D. (2023). Akibat Hukum Putusan Majlis Hakim Yang Ditolak Oleh Pemohon Perceraian Sebelum Ikrar Talak (Analisis Putusan: 3693/Pdt. G/2019 Di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Kediri). JURIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 88-105.
Latifa, A. Z. (2018). Penyebab penolakan perceraian di Pengadilan Agama yang berada di wilayah Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Bandung tahun 2016 (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung).
Pratiwi, B. L., Haliyah, D., & Wibowo, A. (2022). Aspek Yuridis Penyebab Gugatan Perceraian Yang Ditolak Di Pengadilan Agama Ketapang Kelas II (Studi Kasus Tahun 2020). Al-Usroh, 2(2), 336-346.
Rosidi, A., Zainuddin, M., & Arifiana, I. (2024). Metode Dalam Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Sosiologis (Field Research). Journal Law and Government, 2(1), 46-58.
Surat Putusan No. 31/Pdt.G/2024/PN Bnj
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
QISTINA: Jurnal Multididiplin Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
